A linguistic expedition to the core of HR!?
Prasad Oommen Kurian
Head - Learning & OD at Bajaj Finserv Group|Talent Management|Lean Six Sigma Black Belt|Executive Coach|PhD Scholar|Author
It is said that the importance of a particular thing for a group is often reflected in the number of words they have for it. For example, Eskimos have many words for 'snow' to bring out the finer nuances in various types of snow (the number of words for snow?that Eskimos have?ranges from about 12 to 52, depending on which Anthropologist you want to listen to).
I was wondering if we can adopt a similar approach to?‘reverse-engineer’ that is really important in the field of Human Resources?(HR). So, let’s see what we can infer by looking at the various areas in HR and examining how many terms are there to describe each of them.
To avoid 'double counting', let’s?consider only the ‘technical terms’('jargon', if you prefer) that are widely used in HR and not just synonyms in English! This classification is not a very precise one, as some of these terms have multiple meanings (and hence they might fit into multiple areas) and as they go in and out of fashion! Of course, the 'core of HR' is also not static and it keeps on?shifting?and?evolving!
These are the areas and the terms to describe them that come to mind immediately:
领英推荐
Hence,?prima facie?it appears that ‘what the employees are supposed to do’ and ‘what is there in the minds of the employees’ seem to be the key preoccupations in HR! While the first one is obvious (else, why do we need employees) the second one could be because of its ‘mysterious nature’ and because of the foundations of HR in psychology!
What do you think? Also,?please let me know if you can add any more areas in HR (that has a large number of terms associated with them) and/or more terms related to an area that has already been listed.
President - Tata Consumer Products, RTD Category
2 年Well captured Prasad. Very well written. From my side one role that can be added is - “developing or preparing the next gen employees even before they enter the sector or the organization so that they make the right choice”. You can argue that it’s not limited to HR leaders - but I think they are best placed to connect with this pool of future of the employees when they are at schools.
Leadership Development| Impact Evangelist| Social Impact|DEI-WYSE Fellow| NVC- India and South East Asia
2 年This is quite fascinating Prasad! Two things that comes to my mind: 1. Following an etic approach where you go beyond that domain and then study and explore and then bring it back to the subject of your study. In anthropology we have etic and emic both the approaches. In your article I see largely the emic one. You may want to explore the second one as well. 2. Language is a extremely complex phenomenon and as we do a deeper investigation we see many layers of the same. The culture, geography and the organizational understanding plays a huge role. Its hard to say if we have understood it all but yes we are diving deeper, which is an encouraging move! The linguistics have a crucial role here to play.
Prasad Kurian this is spot on i have been toying with similar notions. Design of language is fundamental to interaction. The next thing is design of meaning and other behaviours to basically get the fair system and make people reday to participate in corporate world. What is more important is the 'exclude' list, the one that takes away game playing, manipulation, it is this layer that has root causes in issues that end on HR plate.
HR Strategy & Transformation | Life and Executive Coach | Dean's Merit List, HRM XLRI'21 | EE Engineer, NITK Surathkal'16 | Views are Personal
2 年The word "strategic" - for e.g. HR as a strategic advisor to business and CEO. However, in my experience, this word was more frequently used in the college and academic environments rather than in the corporate environment.