The Limits of State

The Limits of State

As part of a body of work on ‘Whole of Society’, i’ve been considering the nature of our societal structures, and their evolution in the context of the Social Age. I’ve written about this before, in terms of ‘Society – Market – State’ and the emergence of ‘New Citizenship’, as well as ‘New Guild’ and ‘Education’ spaces.

Today i’m reflecting on the linear nature of aggregation – smaller into ever larger – and questioning whether, in our hyper connected (radically connected beyond formal systems) and contracted (the abstraction of distance as our digital spaces synchronously connect us) social context, we may see something new.

The Meta-State: defined not as one large aggregation, but rather a hyper connected series of aligned micro/tribal structures.

It’s not really much of a new idea: in the UK we evolved from tribal structures to local fiefdoms and tribal kingdoms, slowly aggregated (through war, marriage, treaty and trade) into regional kingdoms and ultimately one (except in football) United one. Closely following this connection was the ability to plan national infrastructure – road networks (toll roads into nationalised public ones), rail networks, national health services and so on, with local to national democratic representation.

But at National level we are now increasingly tribal, with oppositional political models that separate us on geographic and ideological grounds. Our democracy is largely asynchronous and devolved, abstracted from daily citizenship: i am asked to pay my tax and abide by the law, but i’m not engaged to improve my community or take strategic decisions.

The context of the Social Age allows for alternative approaches: micro engagement in national challenges, innovation of social good through local to national networks, highly synchronous polling or perspective taking, weighted models of voting or engagement tied into social good, and so on. We could create more synchronous models of democracy.

And with it, consider the questions of security, infrastructure, and obligation.

I’m interested in another aspect of this: subscription versus tax. Historically we paid tax, government provided infrastructure, and kept us safe. But much of our social infrastructure is technical, global, fragmented, and free or subscription, as are many aspects of our key cultural influence – music, film, YouTube and TikTok. The obligation of subscription is different than taxation, not least because it’s discretionary and fluid. It speaks to a more individualised and curated approach, which then hints towards the potential for more micro-state approaches, connected within highly interconnected Meta-State structures.

Essentially to break apart certain unifying expectations and aspects of current States (defined by geographical boundaries, history, and established power) and replace them with more internally fluid – and perhaps hence more tolerant – structures.

Is this correct? Almost certainly not. But maybe aspects are. The questions of ‘where do you belong’, or ‘what does belonging mean’ are more likely to lead us into purposeful and coherent tribal and community spaces. And our practical action is inherently more attuned to the local (albeit the globally local context of the Social Age – local becomes an trust bond, not a distance).

#WorkingOutLoud on the broadest context of the Social Age.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Julian Stodd的更多文章

  • #WorkingOutLoud on the Planetary Philosophy

    #WorkingOutLoud on the Planetary Philosophy

    I’ve been immersed in this work today, and will be till the end of the week. Sae has carved out some time, and has…

  • Strategic AI: Domains of Disruption

    Strategic AI: Domains of Disruption

    I’m building out the materials for my new ‘Strategic AI’ workshop, based on the book ‘Engines of Engagement: a curious…

    1 条评论
  • Spaces of Safety

    Spaces of Safety

    Our Organisations must hold a somewhat unusual space, when stacked up against what we see in our broader society. As…

    2 条评论
  • Social Leadership Fragments: Permeability

    Social Leadership Fragments: Permeability

    The impact of social and collaborative technologies has been to make many boundariesmore permeable, with a range of…

  • Social Leadership: Organisation as Ecosystem

    Social Leadership: Organisation as Ecosystem

    Today I’ve been working on the new Social Leadership material, and specifically the notion of the ‘Organisation as…

    2 条评论
  • Fragments: Metacognition, Transdisciplinarity, Sense Making

    Fragments: Metacognition, Transdisciplinarity, Sense Making

    Some of the most exciting areas of learning research are considering features such as the ‘expert generalist’, aspects…

    1 条评论
  • #WorkingOutLoud on the Socially Dynamic Organisation: Disaggregation

    #WorkingOutLoud on the Socially Dynamic Organisation: Disaggregation

    The shift from the Domain based Organisation, through to the Socially Dynamic one, is essentially a disaggregation of…

    2 条评论
  • Writing

    Writing

    I spent last week completely focussed on a longer piece of writing and today am simply sharing some fragments of…

  • London Dereliction Walk: the Edge of Practice

    London Dereliction Walk: the Edge of Practice

    This is the third time I’ve guided the experimental London Dereliction Walk, which is a day of exploration and small…

    5 条评论
  • The Social Context of Generative AI

    The Social Context of Generative AI

    ‘Engines of Engagement: a curious book about Generative AI’ was published a year ago, and my thinking has continued to…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了