The Lie at the Heart of Britain's "Far-Right" Problem

The Lie at the Heart of Britain's "Far-Right" Problem

“The riots in the UK are being perpetrated by a far-right minority.”

This is the common sentiment arising from various British media outlets. It is interesting to note the stress placed on “far-right minority”, even from the newly-minted PM Kier Starmer.

It seems that for protestors labelled as “far-right”, state-backed violence committed against them is socially acceptable and even justified. Undue force and indiscriminate arrests are only a problem if enacted against?those labelled as?peaceful liberal protestors fighting for justice?and democracy, no?

As reprehensible as the rioters’ actions are, it seems that the media is demonstrating a?long-standing and?real bias against the deeper dissatisfactions of this group of people, who may even be representatives of the majority.

Agree with them or not, they have motivations that need to be understood and engaged with. Stamping them down will only lead to further social strife.

Yet this does not seem to be the mission of British media?or Western media as a whole when it comes to reporting on social unrest within their borders. After all, media outlets have played a key role in whipping up violence in the first place,?with right-wing media spouting anti-Muslim / anti-immigrant rhetoric for many years, with left-leaning media burnishing their ultra-liberal credentials by rejecting any arguments from the many citizens concerned about immigration. Pretending it is a non-issue and readily labelling it as racist is similar to calling anyone who is opposed to Zionism as an antisemite.

Couple this with economic hardships — falling living standards, crumbling public services, escalating housing crisis, etc. — experienced by the poorer segments of British society, and media companies have helped sow fertile ground for such violence.

One also has to wonder if the rioters really are a “minority”. When I was a student in the UK,??it was often the case at?football matches?to?see fans throwing banana peels at Black players. These, too, were a minority. But?what remains unsaid is?that?these individuals had the implicit or complicit support of many people around them, even the majority. Otherwise, they would have been stopped.

There is a resemblance to these riots. That the trigger event led to such widespread violence so quickly belies the barely-contained tension beneath the surface of polite British society, much of it racist. The rioters are simply the tip of the iceberg, a manifestation of the conversations held behind closed doors?and even in posh cricket clubs.

Yet the media will not talk about this. Why?

One has to look at the international image of Britain. The nation’s political elites want to maintain its veneer as a high-brow, non-racist nation. One which is accepting of diversity and has therefore earned its place on the highest rung of the civilisational ladder, as if to say: “Not only are we economically developed, technologically advanced, and culturally complex, we are also morally superior”.

Either through tacit agreement or alignment of beliefs, the media support the elite in this facade.

The joint attempt of the state and media to safeguard Britain’s moral high ground is imperative because it helps the political elite preserve their self-imposed license to judge other nations and maintain their legitimacy as a world leader.

But essentially, this is a lie.

And the speed and scale of these riots give voice to this lie. Cracks are appearing?in?Britain’s social fabric as it struggles to reconcile its glossy image with the reality that many of its people are unhappy with how the globalisation project has come to bear in their nation.?First it was the West Indians and “Pakis” and now it is all those Muslims and even Chinese.

Like the people of every other nation, Britons are afraid of change. Yes, they have racial prejudice. Yes, they believe their country is better than others. Yes, they don’t want to share their resources. But its communities are worried about their futures just like any other. And by simply dismissing the actions of these rioters as a “far-right minority”, Britain’s media and political elites continue to perpetuate a self-gratifying lie instead of opening an honest conversation on how to reconcile with change in a globalised world where plurality is becoming the norm.

Paul Wenman

Sustainability | Corporate Responsibility | ESG Reporting | Responsible Supply Chains | Responsible Investment | Sustainability Data Management | Strategic Risk Assessment | Management Systems

7 个月

A facile, deeply flawed and somewhat insulting 'perspective' from someone who refers to the 70s (I assume) as a reference point for modern Britain's attitudes to those of other races. Anyone who has actually lived in the UK over the last 50 years or so will have seen the dramatic transformation of attitudes which genuinely do make the UK one of the most tolerant, embracing and celebratory of different cultures, regardless of skin colour. Of course, we have our problems, as do most other countries across the world. But to infer that the UK has a significant racist culture is simply wrong. It's much more complex than a view from Hong Kong could reveal. A major problem we do have is people spreading biased, sometimes embittered views without facts to support them. This survey would be a good place to start a remote assessment of how normal British people feel about such things. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/love-thy-neighbour.pdf

  • 该图片无替代文字
Conan Magruder

I help teachers go where they're appreciated / Turn curriculum and practice for schools into skills as Consultant and Vice Principal / AP History and Psychology Teacher and Tutor

7 个月

It is pretty ridiculous when relentlessly anti UK and US figures cite right wing sources whenever they can and then want to claim that right wing rioters aren't right wing. Would these same people claim that riots elsewhere were not right wing? Nope, they'd rationalize any government action to bring them down.

Richard Brown

Veterinary Surgeon and Independent Consultant

7 个月

Possibly a facile analysis. For starters within any country behind closed doors locals will say very rude things about people who are not originally local.Thus in Ghana as a teenager I was abruni or as the children sang 'abruni, bye bye'. I was told was 'white man by by', in South America I was a 'gringo' possibly the only redeeming feature was I was English not American.In Hong Kong I was gwailo the wife gwaipo. Depending on tone this could be very friendly or highly abusive and it carries on for every country, what the Chinese can call Africans is amazing..The English have been for last 600+ years mongrels with consistent immigrations, their behaviour is very different from Scots Welsh Irish. One distinctive quintessentially English behaviour different from the other 3 is this regular once every 10 to 20 years mindless violent, mob rioting.The 'cause'(that is the excuse for the riot) could be anything. A century ago this phenomenon kick started the creation of a Police Force. To say it is right wing has an element of truth, more accurately this is the phenomenon of the ancient 'London mob' now dispersed a little more widely. The only high ground the UK likes to aim for is humour of a self depreciatory kind, think Mr Bean.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Chandran Nair的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了