Let’s Talk Inclusive Language — Use inclusive language for holiday conversations
Suzanne Wertheim, Ph.D.
?? Language is an operating system, and it‘s time for an update ?? Keynote speaker ?? Author of The Inclusive Language Field Guide
It’s the November issue of Let’s Talk Inclusive Language!
This column is a supplement to the Worthwhile Language newsletter, which comes out on the 15th of each month.
Have an inclusive language question? You can send it to [email protected] . All questions are anonymized.
As I was getting my mic in place, the reporter for KPIX CBS News Bay Area said,
“Here’s something I’m going to ask once we’re rolling. I’ve been thinking about the new conflict in the Middle East. And we’re rounding into the 2024 election season. So, there are going to be a lot of emotionally fraught and highly charged topics around us. Can we apply your principles of inclusive language to help us with these conversations ?”
I honestly wasn’t expecting this question — this was supposed to be a fluffy, “tell us about your book, local author!” kind of interview.
Luckily for us both, I had been spending the several days since October 7th thinking a lot about how inclusive language fits into a world of conflict.
?
So, can we apply my principles of inclusive language to emotionally fraught and highly charged conversations?
Yes. Yes we can.
Although, let’s be honest — when people are deeply entrenched in a position, and are maybe filled with anger or fear or a dehumanizing kind of hate, then there is only so far a conversation involving a difference of opinion can go.
My principles of inclusive language can serve as guardrails for “dangerous” conversations. Especially because they use human behavior as a starting point rather than human identity.
Because identity is often not a practical starting place, especially since many people seem to be suffering from an empathy deficit for all kinds of non-dominant identities.
We are living in a time of extreme polarization and dehumanization. It shows up on social media, especially places like 4-chan and Gab. It shows up on broadcast and print media, especially outlets with a known political leaning or tabloid-style presentation. And it shows up in our everyday segregated world, which increasingly feels like a series of echo chambers.
The principles of inclusive language are designed to be depolarizing and rehumanizing.
Nudging us to focus on our common humanity and to share facts and histories and other perspectives with people who have been taught to see the world a different way.
Here in the US, the most common “dangerous” topics people have told me they’re worried about are:
?
The “safest” of these to talk about in newsletter form is #3, financial realities. So let’s see how the principles of inclusive language might help an American Thanksgiving conversation between, say, 30-year old Emily and her 65-year old Uncle Joseph.
?Let’s say Uncle Joseph has just hit a whole bunch of stress points with his (genuinely concerned) questions:
At this point, Emily probably needs to take a deep breath. But she can then point out the ways that Uncle Joseph is violating the principles of inclusive language (without being explicit about what she is doing, for maximum effectiveness). I recommend moving back and forth between personal anecdotes and data — this is the strategy I use in my book to make it as convincing as possible to people coming in skeptical or at a starting point.
?
Principle 1. Reflect reality.
领英推荐
?
Principle 4. Incorporate other perspectives and Principle 5. Prevent erasure.
?
Principle 6. Recognize pain points.
?
Principle 2. Show respect and Principle 3. Draw people in.
?
A few more tips:
There is a decent chance that Uncle Joseph will not accept any dissent or critical feedback from someone younger than him. For some people, “respect” is unilateral, and only goes upward to the person with more power or authority or age.?
If that’s the case, then Emily’s only real recourse is to draw a healthy boundary and say something like, “It looks like finances are something we can’t discuss productively, so I won’t be talking about them at all with you.”?
When it comes to more fraught topics, like problematic behavior and violence in the Middle East, Trump and the American alt-right, and LGBTQ+ people, especially transgender people, there is an excellent chance that a conversation can only go so far.?
How much education and intellectual labor and emotional labor are you obligated to do with someone who doesn’t believe that members of a certain group are fully human? Who doesn’t believe that they deserve all the respect and entitlements of full personhood??
This is an excellent question, and one everyone needs to decide for themselves. My one last piece of advice is that if you are a member of a group that is a target of bias, it may be too much for you to advocate for yourself and your group. For your own mental and physical health, it’s probably better to let someone else advocate and educate (this is where ally work is especially useful!), or to just remove yourself from the conversation.
Your health and your safety come first.?
I wish you the best of luck with your holiday gatherings, family gatherings, and conversations with friends who hold a position that is different from your own.
Want more?
Would you like an inclusive language toolkit that lets you or your team feel more informed and more confident?
You can order my book , The Inclusive Language Field Guide, available everywhere books are sold. It is a paperback, an e-book, and an audiobook.
And you can book me for a keynote or workshop on inclusive language. Talks and trainings are always customized, with a focus on the high-impact changes most relevant to attendees.
I also run inclusive language audits of materials from websites to marketing campaigns to news articles.
Did someone forward you this email or link?
Want to sign up so you don’t miss my monthly advice about inclusive language?
Global leader and educator. Author. Coach. Speaker.
1 年Another super clear and helpful article. Thank you, Suzanne! I especially appreciate your advice to Emily to avoid in-group terminology. God forbid she be labeled as "woke." Game over. I'm pulling for Uncle Joseph to have his world expanded some through Emily's science-based (and artful, and hopefully loving) efforts.
Author & Book Coach to self-publishers of nonfiction: speakers, advocates, business pros, educators & experts ?? selfpublishersbookplan.com
1 年Another good one Suzanne Wertheim, Ph.D.! Loved the example of the convo with Uncle Joe and finances... Reminds me of MacArthur genius, Loretta Ross Don't call people out -- call them in. Here's her TedTalk on Youtube: https://bit.ly/3StXEeR