Let’s Start a Human Revolution in Business

Let’s Start a Human Revolution in Business

Over the past few months, there has been increasing conversation about the decreasing U.S. unemployment rate. For the most part, it’s been on a steady decline since the number of unemployed in the U.S. hit 10% during the 2009 recession.

So, if most of the country has a job now, why aren’t people happier? After all, having a job means having money, and if you have a job and money, you’re happy, right?

According to Gallup:

“The American workforce has more than 100 million full-time employees. One-third of those employees are what Gallup calls engaged at work. They love their jobs and make their organization and America better every day. At the other end, 16% of employees are actively disengaged — they are miserable in the workplace and destroy what the most engaged employees build. The remaining 51% of employees are not engaged — they’re just there.

Only about one in five say their performance is managed in a way that motivates them to do outstanding work. Employees feel rather indifferent about their job and the work they are being asked to do. Organizations are not giving them compelling reasons to stay, so it should come as no surprise that most employees (91%) say the last time they changed jobs, they left their company to do so.”

 These statistics do not paint a picture of a workforce that is happy.

 For quite a while, I’ve quoted this statistic from a Gallup poll: The number one determinant of happiness is a good job. What is a good job? Here’s another Gallup quote with resonance:

“…the great American dream is to have a good job, and in recent years, America has failed to deliver that dream more than it has at any time in recent memory. A good job is an individual’s primary identity, their very self-worth, their dignity — it establishes the relationship they have with their friends, community and country. When we fail to deliver a good job that fits a citizen’s talents, training and experience, we are failing the great American dream.”

How did our leadership in business begin to fail “the great American dream”? How did we get to this point and, more importantly, how do we get to the point where people feel again like they have a good job?

Our approach to business--our approach to the people whose blood, sweat and tears make that business possible--with its roots in the archaic practices of the Industrial Revolution, is no longer working. Time for a Human Revolution.

But, first, a little history.

Dignity and the Industrial Revolution

If you look at the Industrial Revolution, the beginning of mass production when Henry Ford started making Model T Fords, mass production was about mass production. It was not about human dignity or human growth.

There were many economic benefits. We give great credit to the Industrial Revolution for raising the standard of living in our country, which isn’t a bad thing. Factories for cars, shoes and appliances came to small communities.

Henry Ford paid people fairly well, compared to what they could make on a farm. But we took a farmer who had a craft and a pride in his craft (though also an unpredictable income stream), and we gave him a job in a factory. And he went from being a craftsman in his trade or working on a farm and we put him on an assembly line where he put on a hubcap every 15 seconds.

Then we measured how fast he put on those hubcaps and we thought, maybe we can get him to do this in 12 seconds. Why? Not to create a more meaningful role for this man or woman, but because we wanted to make more money. We wanted to get our cost down so people would buy more cars. We were enamored with mass production and the wealth it created.

And, because we were focused on wealth creation and not people, Unions were formed to protect the people we employed because we were more interested in our product and our customers than our people.

At some point, companies started making so much money, we could afford to be nice to people because we needed them to meet our market demand. We gave them vacation time and benefits because we had to compete for skilled talent. But, just as before, we didn’t do it to improve the lifestyle of the person, we did it because we needed them to produce product and wealth.

All of a sudden, in the 1950s and early 1960s, America started facing more international competition. Their prices were lower than our prices. Once this happened, we decided we couldn’t afford to give that skilled assembly worker $15 an hour in Evansville, Indiana or Toledo, Ohio anymore.

To maintain our profits and compete, we started moving good paying jobs to places like Mexico, then to Brazil. Factories in Evansville and Toledo were abandoned. Now we’ve moved those jobs to China, because we’re constantly in the search of the person who would work for considerably less than the last person.

Eventually, those more price competitive imports were of good or better quality. So, we went overseas to study innovations in industrial process improvement like Lean. But again, it was never to enrich the person’s experience, it was to eliminate waste.

Somewhere in the latter part of the Twentieth Century, the purpose of business became about serving the shareholder only and a new type of business executive was created. As my friend Raj Sisodia said:

“At first, these top executives were relatively modestly paid; it was really about power. That started to change sometime in the latter part of the twentieth century when we began to see a lot more emphasis on shareholder wealth creation. We then started to have CEOs being paid not only high salaries but also large amounts of stock and stock options. We entered an era where the leaders were primarily those individuals who were most motivated by money. They were promised that if they were able to raise the stock price, they could make tens of millions, in some cases hundreds of millions, of dollars.”

And the needs of people moved further away from the thoughts of company leadership.

Then, technology advanced to the point where robots and artificial intelligence could do jobs quicker and more efficiently that people so more factories were closed and more jobs were lost. This second Industrial Revolution, the technological or digital one, is still going on today. And every day there’s new speculation about the dire consequences the American worker will face, thanks to continued prioritization on shareholder return and profit.

The unexpected costs

Despite the benefits of the Industrial Revolutions, after all this time, the way business has evolved and its way of looking at people has become far more damaging than we realize. It’s affecting our physical health. The workplace is killing us.

I was featured in a recent book by Jeffrey Pfeffer, Dying for a Paycheck, who, in an interview, summed up my comments correlating the workplace with the healthcare crisis in three points:

“The first point, which is consistent with data reported by the World Economic Forum and other sources, is that an enormous percentage of the health care cost burden in the developed world, and in particular in the U.S., comes from chronic disease — things like diabetes and cardiovascular and circulatory disease. You begin with that premise: A large fraction — some estimates are 75 percent — of the disease burden in the U.S. is from chronic diseases.

Second, there is a tremendous amount of epidemiological literature that suggests that diabetes, cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome — and many health-relevant individual behaviors such as overeating and under-exercising and drug and alcohol abuse — come from stress.

And third, there is a large amount of data that suggests the biggest source of stress is the workplace. So that’s how (Bob) Chapman can stand up and make the statement that CEOs are the cause of the health care crisis: You are the source of stress, stress causes chronic disease, and chronic disease is the biggest component of our ongoing and enormous health care costs.”

We give the Industrial Revolution and the evolution of business over the last century a lot of credit for raising the standard of living – providing housing, shelter and food. People can get jobs with a more predictable income and afford better housing and education.

All those things are good and can contribute to stability and happiness, but when dignity is removed from work, those things matter less. And this is where we are now. Generations of people who are hurting from a cycle that is in place to help them provide for their loved ones but is killing them in the process.

Leaders, this is the reason why we need a Human Revolution in business.

The Human Revolution

The Industrial Revolution was never about allowing people to express their gifts fully. It was about value creation, it was never about creating value in humans.

That’s the piece business has missed and that’s the piece we’ve found on our journey at Barry-Wehmiller. People are capable of doing amazing things if we just give them the environment in which they can discover, develop, share, and be appreciated for their gifts.

The Human Revolution is about organizational leadership reconnecting with their own humanity and recognizing the humanity of those they lead. Recognizing that the people within their span of care are not numbers on a spreadsheet that are part of the calculations that equal profit and loss, but someone’s precious children and should be treated accordingly. Recognizing that the people within their span of care are not just functions, but whole beings who are capable of so much more than the role they are pigeonholed into.

When we treat people with respect and dignity and create opportunities through which they can realize their potential and be appreciated for it is how we, in business, can fix the broken American Dream.

We can balance economic value with human value, where everyone benefits.

This quote from a CBS News article offers great perspective:

“According to a December 2014 New York Times poll, the number of Americans who still believe in the American Dream is slipping. It was 72 percent in early 2009, at the worst of the financial crisis, and 64 percent this past December, in spite of the improved economy… The flip side of the news that faith in the American Dream has slipped to 64 percent, is that 64 percent — nearly two-thirds of Americans — still DO believe in an idea that is often about much more than making money.”

People want to believe. It’s our responsibility as leaders to make the American Dream a reality. But this is not just about the American Dream, it goes beyond the American Dream. It's about the dream of building a better world.

We can do this by moving away from the singular focus on shareholder value and working towards leadership practices that create a “safe” environment. An environment where people feel valued for who they are and what they do as we collectively aspire to a vision that creates value for all stakeholders.

Business could be the most powerful force for good if it simply cared about the lives it touches. That is the Human Revolution and it is the revolution that will transform business and the world in a dramatic fashion.


Bob Chapman is Chairman and CEO of Barry-Wehmiller, a $3+ billion capital equipment and engineering consulting firm with more than 11,000 team members worldwide. He shares thoughts, stories and insights on leadership and business on his blog, trulyhumanleadership.com. His Wall Street Journal best-selling book, Everybody Matters: The Extraordinary Power of Caring For Your People Like Family, published by Penguin Random House, is available through online retailers and in bookstores everywhere. You can also follow Bob and Barry-Wehmiller on Facebook and Twitter and find out more about transforming the culture of your own organization through the BW Leadership Institute.

Naveen Khajanchi

Leadership Search | Executive Coaching | Insead Alumnus

5 年

Bob Chapman?Great points . Being humane and acting on that thread without expectation is what for me is a great starting point . My daily KRA? https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/specials/new-manager/from-ceo-to-chief-purpose-officer/article24986056.ece

回复
Jerry Sitek

Founder/CFO at Human Balance and Stability Systems - HBS Systems

6 年

Continued…. Chairs control sway in a big way but it is twice as bad as smoking for the heart. Another fascinating result of locked knee standing is the torque and strain it puts on the lower back in what managers feel are simple tasks. If managers understand that workers are quite simply focused on relieving their misery in standing, instead of focusing on the task, job, team or company it can all make much more sense. Remember when I said that lean efforts have placed everything as conveniently as possible? Well, the cashier (for instance) is still reaching, lifting and twisting with locked knees. So, when you say that the workplace is dying for a paycheck, you could not be more accurate. We developed a solution that controls postural sway to improve engagement and unlock the knees to allow for proper hip hinge movement to reduce lower back torque. The general consensus I see in comments on this post has been that it will take a great deal of time and effort to change the way society views the goals in business. But in the mean-time, we can take immediate and significant steps to correct what may very well be the root cause of effects on PQRS, WC, and Healthcare. Misery can and has led to very serious social problems.

Jerry Sitek

Founder/CFO at Human Balance and Stability Systems - HBS Systems

6 年

Continued….standing plays a much larger role than anyone has ever imagined. The CDC reports that there are in fact 133M workers in the US and 89M of those stand in their jobs and experience fatigue https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6701a1.htm. We have all come home exhausted and proclaim that it was due to a hard day’s work. But what if that was not true at all? What if, we could stop this expansive exhaustion of our energy that leads to fatigue and ultimately significant lack of engagement, affecting quality, production and even leading to injury. What is the one thing we have not addressed in centuries of automation and innovation? It’s the way we stand to do all of these jobs. We all stand with locked knees and this makes us feel more stable when we are “freestanding”. We do this until we can lean on something to stabilize to feel better, if for no longer than a few seconds. Our bodies work very hard to keep us balanced in gravity because we experience postural sway as the body naturally would lay flat in gravity. The energy being expended is far greater than anyone really understands and it is only understood when you can reduce it and see how good you really do feel. That is what made chairs so popular. Continued….

Jerry Sitek

Founder/CFO at Human Balance and Stability Systems - HBS Systems

6 年

Bob Chapman, this is very insightful and I have some adjacent thoughts. I have experienced the disengagement you mention first hand and in 2015, Cathy Sitek and I took measures to prevent it in our MFG business. We began to research why we felt so miserable in our own workplace.? One of the first things we found was the attached graph that shows the steady decline of employment in MFG next to the steady increase in output. There is nothing suprising there given the advent of automated and lean MFG efforts but when you place it up against the ever rising instances of muckular skeletal disorders (MSD) in MFG, it clearly shows that we have less people working, harder than over to meet output. One would think that automation would lower MSDs but that has not been the case. This in itself, supports your insights.? But it is happening across so many sectors that there is more at play here. If we follow the thought I just laid out, we can see that retail has automated the checkout belt, moved the cash register closer and more, yet the cashiers just keep experiencing MSDs to the point that retailers are simply phasing them out now. It could be that. Continued...?

  • 该图片无替代文字

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bob Chapman的更多文章

  • Mending the (Dis)Connection

    Mending the (Dis)Connection

    Some time ago, I read a thought-provoking article in The Atlantic, titled “Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have…

    7 条评论
  • Shine Your Light: A Message for 2022

    Shine Your Light: A Message for 2022

    It’s no exaggeration to say that the last couple of years have been extraordinary. We are still in the midst of a…

    3 条评论
  • Feeding the Hunger for Dignity

    Feeding the Hunger for Dignity

    Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit – causing massive unemployment and a still uncertain forecast of what a recovery will…

    5 条评论
  • Elect to Be a Better Listener

    Elect to Be a Better Listener

    It goes without saying that 2020 has been quite a year. We find ourselves in the midst of an unprecedented global…

    2 条评论
  • Ending the Poverty of Dignity

    Ending the Poverty of Dignity

    I don’t ever remember a time during which I’ve been more concerned about the future of our country. Before the COVID-19…

    30 条评论
  • An open letter to the CEOs of Business Roundtable

    An open letter to the CEOs of Business Roundtable

    On Monday, Aug. 19, 2019, Business Roundtable, a group of 181 CEO's from some of the biggest corporations in the U.

    98 条评论
  • The Slow Burn of Poor Leadership

    The Slow Burn of Poor Leadership

    Recently, the World Health Organization added “burn-out” to the International Classification of Diseases. They stopped…

    38 条评论
  • Managers Are Unnecessary, But Leaders Are Essential.

    Managers Are Unnecessary, But Leaders Are Essential.

    A headline in an article posted online by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch the other day caught my eye.

    177 条评论
  • Wellness and Work: What's the ROI of Caring?

    Wellness and Work: What's the ROI of Caring?

    Someone from a major health organization once told me that the person you report to at work can be more important to…

    23 条评论
  • Robots Won't Save the American Dream

    Robots Won't Save the American Dream

    Recently, Jack Ma, Executive Chairman of Alibaba Group, was quoted in a CNN story saying "In 30 years, a robot will…

    108 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了