Let's finally stand up to evil leadership – 5 things we can do today
Dr. Tobias Leipprand
Founder and Partner at LEAD Forward | serial social entrepreneur | change consultant, machine learning expert, public speaker | creating future-proof organizations
Putin's attack on Ukraine blatantly reminds us of the evil side of leadership. Not only has he done the unthinkable (again) and attacked another country and its people. He has launched the largest ground war in Europe since WWII. He has also systematically reframed reality over the last decade. I myself, as many of us, have had a more and more queasy feeling about Putin and Russia's politics in the last years. Yet I did not get myself to act, or to take a more radical – a more appropriate – stance. I did think more than once "well maybe NATO did in fact venture East against an agreement,” and questioned my harsh judgement on Russia's aggressive foreign policy. We humans are not good in calling out bad and evil leadership. But given the state the world is in we better learn quickly!
In the last days I have spent many hours pondering and talking to friends and family. I try to make sense of what has become of my world. It is a weird feeling of despair, a feeling of powerlessness and sorrow watching Ukrainians being killed and displaced. A feeling of Europe being physically under attack. A fear of how bad it can still get. After all, I didn't see this coming. So am I just naive to think WWIII sounds absurd?
But there is also a strange feeling of clarity and relief. The relief that the gaslighting has ended.("Gaslighting?is a colloquialism, loosely defined as making someone question their own reality.") No longer am I allowing Putin – or any other autocrat for that matter, Trump included – to distort my view on reality. As do Europe and the EU, as well as the NATO countries. It feels like Putin's attack made us wake up to what we really are about, what we stand for.
While it may seem farfetched to you, I believe that this act of breaking the gaslighting spell and reclaiming our view on reality is not only the way to combat the autocrats of this world. I believe the same act is needed toward bad and evil leadership in our everyday business and work lives. If in these troubled days we learn to fight back the autocrats of this world, we also learn about ending bad leadership in our everyday lives. And vice versa, what works on your abusive boss might also topple a tyrant.
Evil leadership is everywhere we look
The politician who embezzled taxpayer money takes a sabbatical in the private sector and reappears a few short years later at the right time and with the right messages. All is forgotten. The priest who is known to have sexually abused children is not charged and brought to justice, but moved to a different diocese where nobody knows him. Some (halfhearted) coaching, therapy, or just praying surely will transform him. The narcissist business leader who pushes his team members into exhaustion with a mix of dominance and coaxing gets sacked, but then is hired by the competition.
Unethical, bad, evil leadership. The dark side. Call it what you want. It is paramount, and for understandable reasons: Bad leadership can get you far. Take Narcissistic personality disorder?(NPD): It is not necessarily a bad thing to have as a leader. Feeling important and craving admiration may fuel you to climb the ladder. Prioritizing yourself over others might not be contemporary best practice, but often it gets you where you need to be. Studies show that narcissist traits are perceived by many as "leader-like", showing dominance and charisma. Narcissists are more likely to emerge as leader in a group of non-leaders. Yet we know narcissistic personality disorder causes harm in others, prevents successful change and transformation.
And there are other traits of evil leadership: Barbara Kellerman, a Harvard professor on public leadership and former advisory board member at LEAD, has extensively reviewed the dark side of leadership and finds seven primary types of bad leadership. She also shows how followers collaborate with bad leaders, sometimes even cause bad leadership. And this, as Maura Reynolds writes in Politico Magazin on a conversation with Fiona Hill, is happening as well with Putin – bad followership: "...patterns include Western businesses who fail to see how they help build a tyrant’s war chest, admirers enamored of an autocrat’s 'strength' and politicians’ tendency to point fingers inward for political gain instead of working together for their nation’s security."
In my own career, I have come in close contact with numerous cases of bad leadership, and I have personally been affected more than once. One time things got so bad, my body caved in under the stress and pressure. I got a strong ringing in my ear that took weeks to subside. I still remember seeking refuge in my yoga practice. One day I came to class and found myself shedding tears throughout the entire 90 minutes of the class. Thank God I sat in the very front and no one took notice...
One hugely important disclaimer: There is of course a danger in labeling others as "evil" without checking yourself. Good leadership, good intentions, bad leadership, manipulation, evil leadership. This is all murky territory and the lines blur. No leader is free of negative traits and it is our job to constantly improve and check ourselves. And most of the times we help our leaders change and get better. I myself just got some clear feedback from my team which I will have to chew on, understand, and then apply to my practice of leadership. But when a line is crossed, when people are seriously harmed, when ethics are abandoned the story is a different one.
We systematically fail in dealing with the dark side of leadership
If evil leadership is so widespread, if the pain inflicted is so tremendous, the damage done so extensive – why then do we not call out a bad leader? Why do we hardly ever properly sanction leaders who do wrong again and again? Why can't we stop the Putins of this world more effectively? Why do we meet them with halfhearted responses? Why, in the business context, do we simply move bad leaders on to other posts, out of the way? Why do we allow them to continue to lead, to inflict harm, and to abuse their power?
领英推荐
It is a conundrum of bad leadership that has sat with me for a long time. I have seen people practicing bad leadership being defended by their followers, even by myself. I have seen the gaslighting, the distortion and reframing of realities – done purposefully by some and subconsciously by others. Often, it happens over time and no single wrongdoing is so extreme that it warrants a hefty response. After all, who wants to be an alarmist in their organization? In his early days, Putin seemed like just another Russian leader who posed topless on a horse. Stereotypical masculinity - cute, but so what. When all the bots started appearing on social media and it became clear those are coordinated, well, it was easier looking the other way. And of course, beneficiaries like Trump made sure the narrative wouldn't stick. Then Georgia, then Crimea, and now this madness. It took a looooong time for us to wake up.
We have to admit, as humans we might not be naturally equipped in the best way to handle abusive leaders. Probably there are good reasons in evolution and anthropology, but those don't excuse anything.
It is time for us to develop tools and practices to stop evil leadership before it takes root.
We can break the spell of evil leadership
In the end, the shit show has a chance to stop if one of us stands up. #metoo was so empowering because it broke the spell. Every single woman who stood up for herself and others is a heroine and deserves our deepest respect. Every employee who talks to their ombudsperson about abusive leadership is a hero in their own right. These are acts of heroism because they require the incredible work of shifting our distorted view of reality back in focus. End the mindfuck. See clearly again. Pulling yourself out of the swamp by your own hair.
Yes, often we may be too small to change a whole system. And the leaders we seek to correct may overpower us. But let's not get disheartened. Here are five ideas of what we can do:
I would love to hear from you: What are your experiences with bad and evil leadership? What works to break the spell? What can we do about the bully boss at work? And what to do about this Russian tyrant?
#earthconverser helping you best serve people and planet: one conversation at a time
3 年Such an important exploration Tobias. At some level, I know there is no separation between myself and the evil leader, they are me and I am them, and at another level, I can and must stand up against evil and injustice, and do all I can to co-create the world I do want to live in. As Charles Eisenstein wrote, evil is real—no less real than any other story. ? https://www.imusttalk.com.ng/2018/05/charles-eisenstein-problem-with-evil.html
Retired
3 年I found this a really thought provoking article Tobias, thanks. I think we in the West are culpable by our willingness to turn an eye to dirty money in our financial systems, in allowing our economies to be inflated by the evils of selling arms to tyrants and odious regimes and being bystanders to bad behaviours rather than challenging them. Keep thinking, keep educating my friend!
Thanks Dr. Tobias Leipprand for your thoughts, words, reflections - especially your own inner soul searching. I would like to add to your list of what we can personally do about evil leadership - talk about and write about it. Your essay helped me today a lot. ????
Gesch?ftsführer TLGG I co-founder 0xNXT I speaker I interested in change
3 年Thank you for starting this dialog Tobias. While I share your anger and sadness over the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian state and?believe we have a lot of room to improve overall leadership practices I'm not sure I agree that combining the two perspectives is helpful. Let me explain why: In politics, as in business, we need to consider both what seems moral and what's the most effective way to get to the most positive outcome. Opposing autocrats wherever we encounter them feels morally right. But is it the fastest way to gradual, complex system change that transitions these countries to liberal democracies? And that's not even questioning whether democracies always bring the most net benefits to the citizens of the world. I don't think characterizing Putin as evil is useful. I oppose his beliefs and behaviors with all my heart. But viewing him as a type of Bond villain ignores his very calculated reasoning and the 1000s of leaders before him that acted just like him throughout history. If we want to anticipate and solve these conflicts we need to see these aggressions for what they are and why they happen. ? Every armed conflict is a catastrophe. But when does it become evil? I don't think the west has been consistent enough at avoiding and condemning wars in the last decades. Let's not fool ourselves. The vast majority of military actions happen at least in part, often mostly, for geopolitical power reasons. The west is guilty of the same behavior in its own conflicts and has supported unworthy causes and failed to support worthy causes. Civilians are always the ones paying the price. That's not to say that the invasion of Ukraine isn't particularly horrible and shouldn't be opposed strongly but I think we lose credibility in the rest of the world if pretend it's a fundamentally different event than many of those other conflicts.? I can think of several recent and plausible future territorial conflicts that didn't and probably won't lead to a strong involvement by the west. All of these conflicts have complex histories. Even within Europe, there are still, at times violent, separatist movements, and some countries even retain overseas territories. Again, I think the arguments Putin is using are particularly weak and should be forcefully challenged, but they aren't incomparable to similar territorial arguments that we've accepted pragmatically. The same is true for gas-lightening. All powerful institutions use propaganda and create their own narratives. We have to fight the most aggressive versions in a proportional way, but I don't think we'll ever get to objective truths in politics and we shouldn't stop questioning our realities just because we are being manipulated.? And lastly, I think we have to watch out not to be too simplistic about good and bad leadership types. While it's easy to describe ineffective leaders I would argue that most successful leaders have clear strengths and weaknesses. Throughout history, we have chosen different personality types for different leadership tasks based on context. People deserve to know what type of leader they elect or choose when they join a company, but they should also have the agency to choose traits that they deem important at that moment. Trump was elected in a fairly democratic process. Many other autocrats were or are favored by majorities in their population. We don't have to agree with their leaders' views and methods to acknowledge that these citizens have their own, often opposing views of the world, and not all responsibility lies with those leaders.? In the end, systems almost always win out over individual personalities in my view. I don't think we've enjoyed peace in Central Europe for so long because fewer bad leaders were present. I think it's because the history and institutions provided a strong enough frame.?I would focus on this over leaders when we want to create better environments. Both in politics and business. What's the equivalent to the ECSC and the Marshall plan for regions that suffer from turmoil? How do connect societies even more and create the right incentives? My perspective changes nothing about the fact that we?should oppose this invasion strongly and continue to pressure Putin in the ways already started. It's just a question of framing.
Building resilient organisations | Executive coach | Doctoral researcher in complexity
3 年Brilliant Tobias, firstly we need to call it out in leadership- no more talk of war rooms, lay off all the war metaphors - the language of battlefields is out of place. Could we revert to the language of love instead. Supporting independent media - in Ukraine and Russia - it’s the global source of power to have real stories to tell.