Let’s accept there’s no best way out of Covid
This week I had reason to use the saying about canaries in coal mines. For those who aren’t aware of the saying, or who haven’t spent time finding out about the fascinating coal mining industry, here’s a teaser. Back in the olden days, before new-fangled electronic devices that can tell miners when the atmosphere around them is becoming dangerous, canaries were a common feature of mines.
The canaries were there to give miners a heads-up that the air was getting dangerous – when the canaries started falling out of their perches, miners knew that they had to skedaddle lest they also succumb to the fumes. While this was unfortunate for the canaries, and something (were canaries still used in this way) that PETA would no doubt be busy chaining themselves to mine entrances about, it was a good way to keep the miners safe.
Independent journalist Bernard Hickey took on the canary role this week. Hickey is an independent journalist with history across many different mastheads. Hickey’s current outlet is?The Kaka, a one-man attempt to reinvent journalism in an age where the public gets their information in new and sometimes sub-optimal ways.
Anyway, Hickey wrote about the messaging coming from the Beehive around the elimination strategy. Unusually for someone who normally leans on the left side of the political spectrum, and who strikes me as putting people before profits, Hickey likened New Zealand to a cage. His thesis was that, while possibly taken for the right reasons, the current elimination strategy is forcing New Zealand down a path that will see us locked off from the world for years.
His article is a litany of misfortune, bad decisions and poor planning – lowering vaccine effectiveness, a poorly resourced health system, pitiful availability of MIQ spaces, vaccine hesitancy and the like. The final kicker that leads to this cage, as Hickey see it, is that there is broad public support for an elimination strategy and hence a lack of pressure on politicians to force a turnaround.
Hickey goes on to suggest that we (where we = the citizens of Aotearoa) are standing bewildered, peering out the bars of a fortress that was built with our complicity albeit with limited understanding.
领英推荐
And there’s the rub. Cast your mind back to March 2020. How many of us watched the pandemic-based movie?Contagion?and truly thought that we were facing a situation of biblical implications? Who remembers the first days of the level four lockdown when we were all genuinely petrified of going out in public lest we should catch a sickness that no one really knew the end result of? Who remembers watching in horror as Italy suffered under its huge first wave of Covid impacts? And who remembers whispers about the planning that was occurring for disposal of bodies and mass group graves?
The decisions that were made at the time were made for the right reasons. And our geographic isolation, coupled with those decisions, have led us on to further decisions. That is the nature of crisis response – you look at the risks, the current situation, the various parameters and make the best decision for the time.
And what so many political commentators seem to ignore is that there is no single answer. Those that make decisions are balancing so many factors – human safety, the capacity of our health system to cope, the economic impact of lockdowns and continued isolation, the mental health factors as peoples’ nerves become ever more frayed. Given those various factors, no decision is perfect, and there is no one correct path.
Of course, Hickey wasn’t just having a moan, and deep in the analysis he wrote was a fairly simple suggestion that the public of New Zealand are owed a bit more openness than they get. His plaintive wail would, it appears, be that if we’re really going to remain isolated for the next two years, that we should know that. But the problem even giving people that much information is that those making the decisions, simply don’t know.
Covid is a complex beast, and delta has shown that assumptions from only a few months ago around vaccination and response have now been thrown out of the window. No politician wants to go out on a limb suggesting anything is a given, only to have to reverse course as situations change.
Canaries work really well for static situations that don’t flex and change rapidly – things like noxious gasses in coal mines. I fear that in his well-meaning analysis, Hickey’s attempt to be a canary was misplaced.
Facility Manager at Ormiston Surgical and Endoscopy Ltd
3 年Well Ben, I follow your commentarys and generally agree with what you write and thought I will support your Company and purchase a couple of face masks but I can't as you don't supply to Auckland where we need them the most. Very disappointed. How about putting your money where your mouth is? Regards Peter
Business Development Director at Design Energy Ltd
3 年Many balls to juggle re dealing with COVID which keeps changing the rules of the game. And we have a multitude of experts offering differing opinions on the best solutions to deal with COVID. And we have people making mistakes now and again as we are want to, and we have a few people being dickheads. Hell, I'm thinking that's a tough gig for decision makers who by and large are making the right calls.
Retired at Being
3 年Once again Ben you have addressed the canary eloquently! For me I am finding it interesting how opinions expressed on LinkedIn when interpreted and clarification sought are considered sacrosanct! Keep up your thinking Ben
A free-thinking advisor with over 30 years of successfully digitising businesses. (MInstD, MIITP)
3 年I don't envy any government trying to navigate a path out of this situation. This is not just about COVID-19. With the borders closed, we have not had any of the seasonal viri arrive on our shores. The Economist has collected data around excess deaths (see https://econ.st/3EqVqTW) that shows NZ has had a significantly lower number of deaths than historically across the population. Flu has largely been absent. The messaging around moving away from elimination is going to be really difficult, but inevitable that it happens. Even if we wait for two years, we are going to experience the return of our historic rate of death as well as the impact of COVID. At the moment I support the government's position of not locking themselves into a plan that will not survive first contact with the enemy (i.e the day before it is announced) as we still have so much to learn about COVID. And its variants that will inevitably follow. We are dealing with a relentless, adaptable and immensely patient foe. Ben, if I understand your position, I agree we don't know enough to decide how to open the cage yet. Although I do agree with Hickey that we have caged ourselves. The only way out of the cage seems to be to vaccinate as many as possible to reduce the impact, and then live with the inevitable. I don't like this option because of the deaths it will involve, so I am hoping smarter people are considering better choices. And I hope every NZer who can chooses to get vaccinated. It's about the one active thing we can do against this foe.
Dynamic speaker, dyslexic thinker, challenger and futurist. 'If climate change touches upon everything, then anything can be part of the solution.' - David Hall, AUT
3 年Ben Imagine for a minute the outcry, if we had a thousand or more Covid cases a day, around NZ. I hear it now. Calls of political incompetence - 'heads must roll' etc. We are dealing with something that is 'smarter' than us, in that it knows how to constantly reshape itself. The only way to fight it is to become better at evolving ourselves, not expecting miracles that will enable us to go back to the lives we once knew. Perhaps we could think of Covid as our canary and use this time as an opportunity to rethink how we might turn our very capable brains to evolving and enjoying our new world.