Lessons from Wharton - Application of Strategy, Competitive Advantage and Alliance for Cyber Security Services Firm
Chandra Prakash Suryawanshi
Managing Director and India Leader for Cyber Security Business
Though of making this year as a year of formal learning, its application in professional life and sharing. Though learning is a continuous process and we all learn on the job, but this year I thought of going back to the classroom to learn both technical and management subjects and apply them in professional life.
I am herein presenting the excerpt and learnings from Wharton’s Strategic Thinking and Leadership course, a 4-course program of Accelerated Development Program.
Strategy is the common word for any vision and set of goals supported by detailed plan and responsibilities, have a measurable outcome and metrics to monitor its achievement. There can be many strategies depending on the situation like for growth- one can have acquisition strategy, new markets, organic etc., while for turnaround – it can be innovation, cost cutting, consolidation, spin-off of no-core assets etc. and lastly for survival and profitability – to make good mix of cost control, maximization of capabilities and efficiency improvements.
We studied all three cases, a Nissan turnaround by Carlos Ghosn, an Acquisition strategy by Cisco and Alliance with Pfizer.
Here is the excerpt
Strategy for Turnaround
- Diagnosis – come up with 3-4 key reasons for fallout /things that can be communicated and addressed.
- Profit model should be in the head. Framework about how the profit drivers are for that industry should be clear.
- Communication of strategy should be clear and brief. Credibility should be high else everything is lost. Speak the truth like it is.
- During turnarounds, everyone is susceptible about job losses, unit closures and sell offs etc. and hence communication strategy is the key which has high credibility.
- Involve people and have them drive your strategy; same people behave differently with different leadership and people often surprise you on the upside; especially in competitive and turnaround situation.
- Do not undermine uncertainty; but be prepared to address situations, competition and changing market reaction.
Leveraging Capabilities
· Value of capability = repeatable processes, not people dependant.
· Capability = competitive advantage and not based on historical evidences.
· Customer driven capability design.
· If you fail, then fail fast and cheap.
Alliances
· Quality of relationship is important for success.
· Strategy – breakup executable plans- owners/accountability / initiatives/execution process.
Now, the critical part is applying them to our businesses.
So, put across the cyber security services business in the context and created a short term and long-term strategy and aligned executable plan to achieve them
Short Term
Be Profitable – via 5 short term plans
1. Cost rationalization
2. Consolidation of smaller and less profitable customers
3. Increase in price to value and shying away from pure price wars to win revenue.
4. Better farming into existing accounts to get incremental revenue
5. Gross margin based sales incentivization rather than order booking.
Long term
1. Creation of accelerator to reduce the cost of delivery and build non-linearity in revenue
2. Shifting from pure services to platform driven services, with some IP, some accelerators and some managed services, that is repeatable
3. Increase the revenue of Managed Services to 60% from existing 35%
4. More investment in creating entry barriers in hunting key clients in developed market
5. Customization of service delivery
To summarize – borrowing a statement from Microsoft – Perform while you transform
The strategy seems to be working, as the business has become profitable and is moving towards long term value creation. Without going into details, a good execution has resulted in extremely positive metrics that were not even thought off; when making it. To our surprise, increment in price and shying away from price wars caused more revenue against our thought of some loss in revenue.
Lessons learned in execution of strategy
1. It should be simple, effectively communicated and continuously monitored and measured
2. Do not do too much analysis of number, depend sometimes on intuition, do not fall in self-justification trap
3. A good idea can come from anywhere; do not dismiss; sometimes a strategy is a moving and living document and not casted though the outcome and principle are.
4. Last but not the least – Reorganization is not the solution and answer to all the strategic problems. People often tend to re-organize business units, geographies and people titles but more often then not; it will not yield any fruitful result. Need is to have a clear profit model, tight control on cost, enhancing capabilities and driving with clear vision. We tried moving to centralized delivery for scale and capability, but it failed so tried back to competency based model and then to Strategy, Integration and Managed services model with final realization that stuff works with finding the right people for the right role and effective communication and shared goals with common objectives rather them structure.
Managing Director and India Leader for Cyber Security Business
7 å¹´Mohit - Thanks for the note. This is not an easy problem to solve and responses are generic. Firstly One need to do commoditized business also for cash flow and maintaining revenue, the incremental leverage can be done for efficiency like some automation, connector library, reporting simplification etc. to increase value, reduce effort or get better value to the customer. I am convinced that this incremental improvements and efficiency is a great tool though not used appropriately. Second is to invest in application of the buzzword in existing services/ platforms and maintain competitive advantage. this is also continuous process, while obviously disruption is good to talk, but need lot of money, singular focus and dedicated and continuous effort to make it successful which generally large and especially service firms lack. So it is all and not one but which one or two to pick and focus in a company's call.
Advisor, Mentor, Member Task force Methanol Awareness Campaign (GoI) , Seaweed committee Niti
7 å¹´excellent summed up.... we too did the same case studies...i have my notes on it....
CEO at CyberSolve | Identity First Security | Consider It Solved
7 å¹´This is insightful. Thanks for sharing. You have analyzed a specific kind of business in your write up. Now this kind of business will need to be adapt to rapidly changing market landscape (infosec is changing evolving very fast). Therefore, setting and resetting the direction for the company in question becomes extremely important. So what is your thought on this front, as to what should be the preferred approach for this direction alignment: - follow the customer (direction is to solve customer's problems no matter how basic and old fashioned they are) - follow competition/analysts/buzzwords (e.g if analysts say cloud or IoT, or anything similar (cognitive) then get on to the bandwagon and hope to benefit from the evolving market) - follow your own path (is there a problem you can solve that others don't know is a problem yet, radical disruption, however due to lower entry barriers this path may not be very likely in case of a professional services company you have analyzed. I feel this is probably the most important question for a business operating in cyber security industry or for that matter any rapidly changing industry vertical. What do you say should be done?