Unauthorized Immigration: Birthright Citizenship Legislative Actions, Reforms, Enforcement, and Executive Orders Without Constitutional Amendments
English common law and early American jurisprudence have informed the understanding of birthright citizenship but are not binding as "American laws." The Constitution is the supreme law, and any legal reforms or reinterpretations must derive from constitutional text, statutory authority, and judicial interpretation. Legislative and judicial actions—not historical precedents alone—are necessary to address modern concerns about the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment.
English common law and early American jurisprudence are not explicitly codified in the U.S. Constitution and, therefore, are not the "supreme law of the land" as defined by the Constitution itself (Article VI, Clause 2). Instead, they serve as historical and interpretative frameworks that have influenced the development and understanding of American law, nothing more.
Congress can legislate to clarify the application of the Citizenship Clause, particularly focusing on the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."Congress holds significant power to clarify the application of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment through legislation.
To address the issue of unauthorized immigration and birthright citizenship through legislative actions, reforms, enforcement, and executive actions without requiring constitutional amendments, the U.S. could pursue a multifaceted approach.
Congress has numerous legislative pathways to address concerns about birthright citizenship without requiring a constitutional amendment. However, a combination of clear legislative language, targeted enforcement measures, and public support could pave the way for meaningful reform.
Sovereignty and the Right to Control Borders
- The Fundamental Principle of Sovereignty: Sovereignty is one of the most critical concepts in both international law and domestic law. A nation must be able to control its borders to maintain territorial integrity and self-determination. If a country cannot control its borders, it undermines its capacity to regulate who enters, who stays, and who can claim the protections afforded to its citizens. This weakens national security, economic systems, and overall stability.
- U.S. Supreme Court Precedent:
- Fiallo v. Bell (1977): The Court reaffirmed that the United States has the constitutional power to control immigration and set its own policy for naturalization and residency. It is within the government's power to define the terms under which immigrants are allowed entry and the conditions for their citizenship or legal status.
- Chavez v. Martinez (2001): The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that border security and immigration enforcement are at the discretion of the sovereign nation and that this power does not require blanket rights for anyone entering illegally.
These precedents underline that, without a functional immigration policy, a nation cannot guarantee its sovereignty or maintain law and order.
Exclusion from Reconstruction-era Protections
- Historical Intent of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments: These amendments were explicitly designed to secure the rights of formerly enslaved African Americans, who had been denied legal recognition, citizenship, and suffrage. The framers of these amendments did not intend to extend such protections to individuals who violated immigration laws or entered the country unlawfully.
- No Connection to Slavery or Reconstruction: Unauthorized immigrants, by definition, do not fall into the historical categories addressed by these amendments: they are not descendants of enslaved individuals nor connected to the broader Reconstruction efforts to establish racial equality.
Immigration Law and Legal Precedents
- Illegal Entry as a Violation of Law: Under 8 U.S.C. § 1325, unauthorized entry into the United States is a criminal offence. Individuals who enter illegally are in violation of federal law and, as such, are not entitled to legal residence or the rights and privileges of U.S. citizens. This principle is supported by the legal doctrine that individuals cannot derive benefits (such as citizenship or residency rights) from their own unlawful actions.
- No Legal Status from Unlawful Acts: Courts have consistently upheld that individuals who enter the United States illegally do not gain any inherent rights to remain or derive status unless specific legal protections (e.g., asylum, Temporary Protected Status) are granted.
The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment
- Text of the Clause: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
- Key Points for Argument: Unauthorized immigrants, by definition, are not "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" in the sense intended by the framers of the 14th Amendment. The phrase excludes those who owe allegiance to another sovereign power, as demonstrated in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), which focused on the children of legal residents, not illegal entrants.
The 14th Amendment was designed to protect the citizenship rights of formerly enslaved African Americans, not to confer citizenship on individuals who enter and remain in the country in violation of its laws
Classifying Unauthorized Immigrants as Part of Smuggling Networks
- Legal Grounds for Association: Many unauthorized immigrants rely on human smuggling networks to enter the United States. These networks are operated by criminal cartels or other organized groups and NGOs in efforts to violate US laws. By willingly engaging with these networks, unauthorized immigrants have acted in concert with criminal enterprises.
Legal Exclusion from Citizenship
- Statutory Framework: Citizenship in the United States is governed by the Constitution and federal law. Without meeting the requirements for birthright citizenship, naturalization, or other specific provisions, individuals cannot claim citizenship.
- Exclusion by Illegal Status: Unauthorized immigrants do not qualify as "naturalized" citizens and often do not meet the requirements for lawful permanent residence, which are prerequisites for naturalization.
- Not Residents "in Law":
Under U.S. law, being physically present in the United States does not equate to legal residency. Unauthorized immigrants, therefore, cannot claim residency rights under the 14th Amendment
Proposed Legal Interpretation
- Unauthorized immigrants:
- Have no claim to citizenship under the 14th Amendment due to lack of legal jurisdiction and allegiance to another sovereign.
- Entered the U.S. illegally, violating federal law, and therefore cannot derive legal status or citizenship privileges from such entry.
- Are distinct from the populations protected by the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, which were enacted to address slavery and racial equality, not unauthorized migration.
Enact Legislation Redefining “Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof”
Congress could pass a law explicitly interpreting "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" to exclude certain groups from automatic birthright citizenship, such as:
- Children born to individuals unlawfully present in the U.S.
- Children born to non-immigrant visa holders (e.g., tourists, students).
- Children of individuals whose primary allegiance is to a foreign state (e.g., diplomats).
- Congressional Authority: Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate naturalization and immigration, providing a foundation for legislation that defines citizenship eligibility.
- Judicial Precedent: The Citizenship Clause is not self-executing, meaning its interpretation can be legislatively clarified within constitutional boundaries.
Amend the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)
The INA could be amended to:
- Codify the exclusion of individuals unlawfully present from the scope of the Citizenship Clause.
- Specify that lawful residence (permanent or temporary) is a prerequisite for the birthright citizenship of children born on U.S. soil.
- The INA, first enacted in 1952, governs U.S. immigration and nationality law. Congress has broad authority to revise and update it.
- The act already specifies criteria for acquiring citizenship at birth for children born abroad to U.S. citizens, demonstrating Congress’s ability to legislate in this domain.
Implement a Territorial Exception to Birthright Citizenship
Congress could pass a law that applies a territorial exception to birthright citizenship for:
- Areas with significant unauthorized border crossings (e.g., near the U.S.-Mexico border).
- Locations where individuals are intercepted while in the process of illegal entry.
- Precedent: Similar territorial exceptions exist for U.S. territories such as American Samoa, where individuals are considered U.S. nationals but not automatically citizens.
- Congressional Power: Congress can legislate conditions under which citizenship is granted in specific circumstances.
Clarify Birthright Citizenship in the Context of Illegal Entry
Congress could legislate that:
- The act of illegal entry constitutes a failure to meet the jurisdictional requirements of the Citizenship Clause.
- Children born to parents who entered unlawfully are presumed to inherit the nationality of their parent’s home country unless the parents regularize their status.
- Subject to Jurisdiction: The Constitution’s use of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” provides room for legislative interpretation.
- International Norms: Many countries base citizenship on parentage (jus sanguinis) rather than location of birth (jus soli), aligning with this approach.
Address Birthright Citizenship in the Context of Human Trafficking and Smuggling
- Create laws that presume children born to individuals involved in illegal smuggling or trafficking operations lack entitlement to U.S. citizenship, pending proof of lawful status by the parents.
- Enhance penalties for those facilitating the illegal entry of pregnant individuals for the purpose of giving birth in the U.S. (birth tourism).
- National Security: Congress has the authority to address issues that threaten national security or public welfare, such as human trafficking.
- Immigration Enforcement: The INA and related statutes provide a framework for penalizing illegal entry and associated activities.
Enhance Citizenship Verification Requirements
- Require additional documentation, such as proof of parental legal status, before granting U.S. citizenship to children born in the country.
- Establish a central database to verify citizenship eligibility for individuals born on U.S. soil.
- Regulatory Authority: Congress can legislate administrative processes to enforce existing citizenship laws.
- Efficiency in Enforcement: Enhanced verification would deter misuse of birthright citizenship claims.
Peter Clarke Retired - Distinguished Entrepreneur - Global Facilitator - Transforming Business Landscapes - Author & Social Commentator Fostering Change -Your Success is My Business
1 个月Legal Meaning of "Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof" The phrase means being fully and legally subject to U.S. laws and authority. It indicates allegiance to the United States and the federal government. Individuals "subject to the jurisdiction" are those who owe direct allegiance to the U.S. government, and not to any foreign sovereign or power. Elk v. Wilkins (1884): The Court ruled that Native Americans born in the U.S. but maintaining allegiance to their sovereign tribal governments were not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S., and therefore were not granted automatic citizenship under the 14th Amendment.