LegalZoom - Deceptive, Bait & Switch & Outright Dangerous Trademark Practices.
Chris DeMassa
Founder TradeMark Express & Urgent Trademark | Since 1992. Expert Trademarking Services, Comprehensive Research, Analysis, Attorney Network, Office Action Protection, Federal & State Monitoring, for all trademark needs.
Since 1992, TradeMark Express is an attorney outsource for step-by-step comrehensive clearance legal research. BE SURE your client's trademark is LEGALLY CLEAR before filing any new trademark.
Our fee is just $200 for a USA trademark search and $200 for a USA Common Law search. This includes analysis of conflicts and similarities. We have not had a USPTO final refusal since 2008.
As an example, here's a comparison of our services with LegalZoom.
-----------
LegalZoom is the first trademark service I am taking a look at for their trademark practices. Please allow me to frame the situation with trademarks, so my findings over the past 2 months will make sense.
Let's start with the FACTS.
1) When you contact a trademark service or attorney, their duty and
responsibility is to actually help you. They see the results of their work every day. Over time, they of all people KNOW when their work for their clients is effective or NOT. We are talking your $, your life savings, your business dream that has to to start off on the right foot. Redoing a startup is hell.
2) Trademark law is broader in coverage than people realize. Always. Marks need to be LEGALLY CLEAR under trademark law. Similar names in sound, appearance and meaning matter. Distribution channels matter. Customer types matter. Related goods and services matter. Famous names and aggressively litigious over reaching trademark owners matter.
3) To do an accurate pre-trademark application research literally thousands of paid databases must be accessed - including the USPTO, each State, full array of business, trade, corporate, fictitious name and yellow page complied and updated databases. This work is critical for the foundation of your trademark and successful business. It takes us a year to fully train a person how to do a search. The research itself takes 3 hours for a trademark search and another 3 hours for a Common Law search. Applications, to get things just right for our client to submit, takes us another 3 hours. So, 8-10 hours.
4) Risk of your trademark refusal is REAL. Our clients are blocked 35%-40% of the time. Great names more. The USPTO - who by statute - can only research its own database, per my Zoom call to Commissioner David Gooder, seems to refuse 39% of their overall trademark applications. After 2 years of prodding, Jason Lott, of the USPTO, a couple weeks ago said they have a new page about COMPREHENESIVE CLEARANCE LEGAL RESEARCH - "And in news you might enjoy... Check out what just went live yesterday: https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/search/comprehensive-clearance-search-similar-trademarks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LegalZoom has the same problem as TradeMark Express.
We are both "Malcom in the Competitive Middle" operations.
Can you imagine being middle priced for your services, where the competitive range is $35 to $6000, for what the business owning public perceives as all being LIKE services?!
There are seemingly 2 dozen outright scams at the top of the Internet who's fees range from $35 to $300. Many are based in third World countries - beyond reach. They are hard to figure out because the one thing they have are great, well written web sites. Their prices are too good to be true. People who are thinking exact domain names and exact Google/Yahoo/Bing searches and don't want to hear any bad news are easy prey for these "services". It is all about the price. Even at $35 and paying $4 a click, it is profitable because it is so easy to sell an unknowingly BAD service. Think about it.
Here's a sample of trademark scams the USPTO has compiled, on their ever growing list: https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/protect/caution-misleading-notices.
Then there are attorneys who unarguably have that "duty and responsibility" I mentioned above. The ones who do LIKE work with my TradeMark Express, (@ $700), and Urgent Trademark, (@ $1000), where most seem to in the $2500-$4000 range, per trademark. After all there is 8-10 hours of work, diligence, analysis and database costs. All these attorneys outsource the comprehensive research to specialty research companies like us, Corsearch and Thomson Compumark at $900 and $1225 per trademark. Yes, there is a group of attorneys who do their own research at the USPTO on a very recently diminished version TESS, as of November 30, as well as on the web. But, all that educated guessing to be able to attract small business startups amid all the bottom feeders at the top of the Internet, takes time too. I figure 90 to120 minutes, but I cannot be sure. Even rural area trademark attorneys make ~$200/hour. Big city trademark attorneys are at ~$500/hour.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically about LegalZoom....finally!
So, do you see the difficulty LegalZoom has in the trademark marketplace? They are forthright that they are not a law firm. In business since 2001, they have had to make sure the public knows they cannot give legal advice. It is al over their web site and when called they mention it then too. As a watchful competitor I can attest that LegalZoom has changed the way they handle trademarks many times.
The messy little fact is successful trademarks need scrutiny of critical analysis to figure out if any given trademark is in fact legally clear. Their low priced model does not work for trademarks. For trademarks, they have to give legal advice. So, they have a network of attorneys as we do, but on a much bigger scale. They operate under the name of Pulse or LZ Legal Services.
When you call to inquire about a trademark, you will meet someone who is very nice who will talk to you without interruption maybe because incoming calls are routed elsewhere. You may be on hold for a few minutes. Be ready to wait. They often close early too. They work from home. They will not transfer you to an attorney. You have to hire them first.
Besides a very short script, they are there to attempt to answer questions and get you back onto the web site to order the $599 package - which is for a trademark application. The trouble is they do not know very much about trademarks. They never mention research at all. You have to ask. When asked they are off script and it shows. Answers vary widely. The process can take a ridiculous 30-60 days, or 4-6 weeks to submit a trademark. Then an even more ridiculous 4 to 14 months for USPTO approval. When asked the length of a report we got answers from "1 to 10, quite a few, to 10-20, to 27 to 50, 100 to 120 pages.
NOTE: as long as a client is responding, then processing a legally clear trademark should take from a few days to 2 weeks. Also, the USPTO is taking 8-9 months to register a mark. Report lengths should be 600 to 800 pages. LegalZoom reports used to be even more than ours, often times 800 to 1000 pages - BUT they were nonsensical in what they were producing. Their research strategies were way too broad, to puff up the report with irrelevant hits. Where they should have gone deeper where they should have, they never did. So, you can have a long bad report. Usually a tell of a bad service is short reports. This shows the cheaped out on the paid databases and they didn't devise enough search strategies to cull out important information. Their attorneys charge extra fees to read more than 10 pages of data. We could not get an coherent answer if this was for analyzing legal research or something outside research.
Yes, they have the prices. So, it is a tactical decision NOT to talk about the needed comprehensive research. They were too consistent on this issue. If we didn't ask about research it wasn't ever going to be mentioned. FYI - their USA research is $199 for just a Federal search, $299 for a Federal, State and Common Law search. BTW, it is negligent to sell only a Federal trademark search to the public. It is only a 12% search. 3.5m/30m marks.
LegalZoom has become to be deceptive. I do not say this lightly.
The LegalZoom web site is wonderful, like their commercials. However in lots of places where they really should talk about the importance of research, they omit this information. See here:
I found a trademark similar to mine. Can I still register it?
Oftentimes no, because it could create confusion.
But if the other mark is used for different products or services, it might be possible because consumers may not be confused about who sells what.
For example, Delta Dental, Delta Air Lines, and Delta Faucet Company coexist as business names because the products are different enough to prevent consumer confusion.
They make it seem like getting a trademark is as easy as going to the grocery store. It is odd that one page titled "Trademark Registration" has just 2 mentions of comprehensive research. There are 5 mentions of search/research. They do not differentiate between full legal research and a simple preliminary search on the UPSTO's TESS. See here:
We’ll research it & report back
Your attorney will perform a comprehensive trademark search to make sure nothing similar is in use. If there are potential issues, we’ll search a second mark for free.
and
How to trademark a phrase
Using a distinctive phrase connected with your business—such as a slogan, motto, or tagline—can help improve your brand recognition. To prevent other companies from using your phrase, you can register a trademark for it—starting with a comprehensive search. However, not every phrase can be trademarked, not everyone can trademark a phrase, and registration does not provide complete protection. A trademark attorney can advise you on the best next steps for registering a trademark for your particular phrase.
This page does not talk about the "comprehensive" research they offer at an extra price of $299. In 5 places an order button to "Register a Trademark", all routed to to a summary page:
领英推荐
Trademark registration
$599
+ federal fees?
Set up your mark for success. With attorney help, you have a 94% chance of registering a trademark.?
Again, no mention there is more to it than the $599. No mentions of $199, (Federal only), or $299, (Federal, State and Common Law), are additional expenses. This you will learn later after you hire LZ. The web site is built to skirt the issue, and minimally mention the bulk of the work they should be doing for your new trademark prospect.
PROBLEM 1 - DECEPTIVE - The comprehensive clearance legal research is the key, the essence the absolute need of why you'd ever hire anyone to successfully secure your future trademark. NOT talking about it gives the impression it is not important, a luxury an add on, so therefore not really needed. It makes it seem that all there is too to getting a trademark is to hire them for $599 and paying the USPTO filing fee of $250 or $350 - as some mentioned.
PROBLEM 2 - BAIT & SWITCH - The energy is to get you signed up for $599 as fast as possible. There is really nothing to talk about, except to go ahead and hire LZ asap. That is all that is needed. Once hired, then they start to cover their exposure to you by having have a talk with one of the trademark attorneys. The attorney will go over all the already self submitted trademark. They then will recommend the $299 Federal, State and Common Law research. Now research is suddenly important. No full disclosure here.
From experience most people do not read everything on a web site. When confirming information is intentionally omitted, then people will buck spending another $299. The problem is that the normal small business startup isn't expecting this extra work, so IF they do not buy it in the first place they will not be in the mood for a 50% upcharge then didn't expect. Why wouldn't a person think to themselves if the research was so important then why wasn't it stressed all over the web site, a web site that SEEMED so through? Why wasn't the full actual fee stressed when I talked to the nice person? They were so nice. IF it was important why didn't they mention it. The attorney just wants to make money. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to envision the thought process of a startup going through a like thought process. A new business owner who wants to save every $ they can.
It was unclear how many days it took to hear from a LZ trademark attorney. Se heard 3 to 5 days, but most just said soon. If the consultation wasn't immediate then you can see why someone would definitely refuse $299 more for research.
Soooo, if the LZ web site and personnel said up front the actual fee was $898, because research is needed too, how would that impact their sales? The answer is right in from of you. The way they are doing it, a half shuffle disingenuous "bait and switch" works best.
Sales are higher when approached just in this way. It isn't about everyone being on the same page from day 1, it is about getting that $599 where they can then sweep through a simple preliminary search - on USPTO's TESS then doesn't work anymore - and filing. Let the chips fall where they may. No certainty.
PROBLEM 3 - Outright Dangerous Trademark Practices - Lastly, which logically follows LegalZoom's initial under selling needed services and under performing their should be their resulting work is a curious claim of a 94% success rate, as you see from a clip above. A high success rate If it were true. All you have to do is scroll down to see the fine print. Take a look:
?Based on filing two applications, each having an independent 75% probability of registration because as of March 19, 2020, 75% of our attorney-led applications that have reached final disposition (registration, rejection, or withdrawal) at the USPTO were successfully registered as trademarks.
This statement may not bother you. But I know their lengthy, albeit scattered research reports 3.5 years ago in 2020, were what we estimated to be 80% accurate. Now from the lightness of today's research I can tell they are LESS accurate than in 2020. LZ is not paying for all the databases they should and the research strategies are not happening. Otherwise they'd have MORE than a mere 75% success rate. We could not get an answer when asked to explain the term "attorney led". Does this mean either preliminary research or comprehensive clearance legal research or just comprehensive research?
Just below that footnote is more fine print:
§If LZLS recommends proceeding with your trademark application and the application receives a 'final refusal' from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, LegalZoom will waive its service fees for preparing a second application for a different trademark. Government filing fees will still apply. Limit one waived service fee for a different mark per order. Trademark registration volume and success comparisons are to Trademark Engine, Trademarkia, RocketLawyer, and Trademark Elite, based on 2022 DocketTrak data.
This is yet more LZ double talk. What does "proceeding with your application" mean? Does this happen only IF you buy the $299 comprehensive research and it is deemed to be clear, then your trademark is filed. Or, if just the poor Federal preliminary direct hit research is run at the $599 price and the trademark is filed?
To get to a "final refusal", you have to fight the first refusal and lose your first argument to the USPTO Examining Attorney. This means you have to pay one of their attorneys to argue the USPTO Office Action refusal. Yes, there are easy fixable Office Actions, but Likelihood-of-Confusion refusals can take an attorney 3-5 hours to argue. What is the fee for that 3-5 hours of work? Since their attorneys are in house they must know the cost to argue. At $250/hour, that is $750 to $1250 more in fees. Conservatively figured.
But wait, there's more! There could easily be a recommendation to argue the second USPTO Office Action, (as you can argue up to two Office Action refusals). This means another $750 to $1250 attorney fee to argue again. I suspect though, as research is the foundation of the mark - either skipped research or weak research - I'd conjecture the refusal was in fact a Likelihood-of-Confusion refusal. LegalZoom might just as soon recommend going to name #2, that they promise they'd do for free =when you pay the new USPTO filing fee of $350 or $250 per class.
However, be aware we are talking 12 to 15 months of time passing since the initial filing to get to this point with the USPTO. You will be well invested in whatever name, logo or slogan you started with where changing the name would be a BIG PROBLEM. The new problem is that people don't realize how utterly devastating it is to change names. Logos and slogans, not at all. Who cares? It is the name that is critical never to change.
IF you choose to live under the radar, live in fear for the next ~9 years. Actual mark owners have 10 years to find you and cease and desist your product or service to take the name back. You certainly will not go back to LZ for a second name. You'll be frozen in time wondering what to do for 6 months. Again, name changes are absolutely devastating.
Oh yea, because you filed a Federal trademark you now are a LOT easier to find to get that cease and desist. There are trademarks on TESS from the 1700's. All posterity is going to see that failed mark Public record. Any possible buyer of your business is going to see the refusal when they do their diligence. Remember, this sad scenario happens to 25% of LegalZoom's clients.
LegalZoom does have its math right. A 25% failure x75% chance of another failure is 19%. Add 19% to the original 75% success rate, based on March 2020 stats, then = 94%. For those 19% it will be a rock road 2.5 years, double the USPTO filing fees and knowledge of the LZ attorney dog's name. If you are in the 6% then you will be so beat up you'll probably never open another business again. Nor will your kids, friends and ex-spouse.
Capitalism loses.
BTW, LegalZoom has a subscription plan that is automatically charged monthly for either 6 months totally $259 or 12 months for $469. LOTS of people complained also on Trustpilot that this was very hard to cancel.
Additionally, when inquiring about incorporating, a non-profit and getting a fictitious name - none of the LegalZoom staff mentioned being clear at the trademark level first, before incorporation. There is nothing about this issue on the LZ website.
This still is the best trademark video ever. Even if you have seen it before, take a look again. NOTHING is more important for your business than your intellectual property!
Crash Course Trademark Primer Video:
Trademarks and Avoiding Consumer Confusion: Crash Course Intellectual Property #5
We have been using this copy for over 20 years:
Comprehensive legal I.P. research is needed to make sure your trade name is LEGALLY CLEAR, before opening, before expansion, before incorporation or before designing your logo. Similarities in sound, appearance and meaning affect legal availability too.
Talk to us!
Thank you!
Chris DeMassa 650-948-0530
Marcela & Erica 202-496-1600
Web Site tmexpress.com
Email [email protected]