Lebanon is the beginning of the application of the electronic bomb Prof. Dr. Abdelrazak Mansour Ali

Lebanon is the beginning of the application of the electronic bomb

Prof. Dr. Abdelrazak Mansour Ali

?

Abstract

The idea of the electromagnetic bomb dates to nuclear weapons research in the fifties. In 1958, American tests of hydrogen bombs yielded some surprising results. A test blast over the Pacific Ocean ended up blowing out streetlights in parts of Hawaii, hundreds of miles away. Researchers concluded that the photons from the blast's intense gamma radiation knocked many electrons to free them from oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the atmosphere. This flood of electrons interacted with the Earth's magnetic field to create a fluctuating electric current, which induced a powerful magnetic field. The resulting electromagnetic pulse induced intense electrical currents in conductive materials. It is concluded that the mechanism of the recent "pager" bombings in Lebanon with the killing and wounding of thousands of innocent people, is simply that it is an experimental operation for one of the applications of the electronic bomb, which started from Lebanon. The experiment succeeded in causing explosions in pager devices that are not connected to the Internet and the World Wide Web. So, what if these electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons experiments were conducted on mobile cellphones and other electrical devices connected to World Wide Web applications, and thus it is easy to control them via the computer? The reality is that the signal reception code was planted in the pager devices to remotely control them since the pager technology does not depend on the Internet or the satellite to monitor and control them remotely. From here, the intelligence roles of the company that manufactures the pager devices are disclosed, as it is considered a front for the Israeli Mossad.

Introduction.

An electromagnetic pulse (EMP), also referred to as a transient electromagnetic disturbance (TED), is a brief burst of electromagnetic energy. The origin of an EMP can be natural or artificial, and can occur as an electromagnetic field, as an electric field, as a magnetic field, or as a conducted electric current. The electromagnetic interference caused by an EMP can disrupt communications and damage electronic equipment [1]. An EMP such as a lightning strike can physically damage objects such as buildings and aircraft. The management of EMP effects is a branch of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) engineering. The first recorded damage from an electromagnetic pulse came with the solar storm of August 1859, or the Carrington Event.[2].

In modern warfare, weapons delivering a high energy EMP are designed to disrupt [3] communications equipment, the computers needed to operate modern warplanes, or even put the entire electrical network of a target country out of commission.[4]

Very high electric field strengths can cause breakdown of the air and a potentially lethal arc current like lightning to flow, but electric field strengths of up to 200 kV/m are regarded as safe [5]. According to research from Edd Gent, a 2019 report by the Electric Power Research Institute, which is funded by utility companies, found that a large EMP attack would probably cause regional blackouts but not a nationwide grid failure and that recovery times would be like those of other large-scale outages.[6]

Non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse (NNEMP)

Non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse (NNEMP) is a weapon-generated electromagnetic pulse without use of nuclear technology. Devices that can achieve this objective include a large low-inductance capacitor bank discharged into a single-loop antenna, a microwave generator, and an explosively pumped flux compression generator. To achieve the frequency characteristics of the pulse needed for optimal coupling into the target, wave-shaping circuits or microwave generators are added between the pulse source and the antenna. Vircators are vacuum tubes that are particularly suitable for microwave conversion of high-energy pulses.[7]. NNEMP generators can be carried as a payload of bombs, cruise missiles (such as the CHAMP missile) and drones, with diminished mechanical, thermal, and ionizing radiation effects, but without the consequences of deploying nuclear weapons.

Discussion

The range of NNEMP weapons is much less than nuclear EMP. Nearly all NNEMP devices used as weapons require chemical explosives as their initial energy source, producing only one millionth the energy of nuclear explosives of similar weight.[8] The electromagnetic pulse from NNEMP weapons must come from within the weapon, while nuclear weapons generate EMP as a secondary effect.[9] These facts limit the range of NNEMP weapons, but allow finer target discrimination. The effect of small e-bombs has proven to be sufficient for certain terrorist or military operations. Examples of such operations include the destruction of electronic control systems critical to the operation of many ground vehicles and aircraft.[10].

The concept of the explosively pumped flux compression generator for generating a non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse was conceived as early as 1951 by Andrei Sakharov in the Soviet Union [11] but nations kept work on non-nuclear EMP classified until similar ideas emerged in other nations.

The idea of the electromagnetic bomb dates to nuclear weapons research in the fifties. In 1958, American tests of hydrogen bombs yielded some surprising results. A test blast over the Pacific Ocean ended up blowing out streetlights in parts of Hawaii, hundreds of miles away. The blast even disrupted radio equipment as far away as Australia. Researchers concluded that the electrical disturbance was due to the?Compton effect, theorized by physicist Arthur Compton in 1925. Compton's assertion was that photons of electromagnetic energy could knock loose electrons from atoms with low atomic numbers [12]. ?In the 1958 test, researchers concluded, the photons from the blast's intense gamma radiation knocked many electrons to free them from oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the atmosphere. This flood of electrons interacted with the Earth's magnetic field to create a fluctuating electric current, which induced a powerful magnetic field. The resulting electromagnetic pulse induced intense electrical currents in conductive materials over a wide area concentrated in electrically conductive devices and materials [13].

The United States power grid felt the reverberations of this power loss, with hundreds of power issues recorded as well.[14]. EMP was triggered by man-made weapons in 1962 when the United States detonated a 1.4-megaton bomb above the Johnston Atoll in the Pacific Ocean at an altitude of 250 miles. The blast resulted in an EMP that knocked out radio communications and electricity in Hawaii, including traffic lights.[15]. They emphasized that the resulting electromagnetic (electronic) explosion would disable electrical equipment throughout the United States, because this electromagnetic explosion ionizes the surrounding atmosphere. But what does ionization mean? Ionization is the ability of a high energy spectrum of electron radiation (gamma rays) to liberate electrons from atoms and molecules of objects, so that these particles become ionized, i.e. electrically charged and unstable because they want to recover their lost electrons.

EMP attacks are not easily replaced in most modern electronics. Industrial electrical transformers at plants and substations would be at risk of overload and catastrophic failures in an EMP attack. These components are very large, expensive, and difficult to manufacture and transport. This makes it difficult to maintain and properly protect spares in EMP-shielded facilities where they might be needed.

Given the interdependence of the United States’ critical infrastructure, the inability to communicate or power industrial processes would have a devastating compounding effect. Major disruptions to water supplies, food production, food transportation networks, and medical services could directly endanger the US population, as such attacks could severely weaken the country’s economic and military power. Electrical power and telecommunications are also two systems that rely heavily on computer systems to manage them and whose major components would most likely suffer severe permanent damage from an EMP attack [16]. The means and motive to target the U.S. with some form of significant-scale EMP attack lie most notably with China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea [17].

Cyber-attacks of sufficient sophistication can mimic some effects of EMP on a comparable scale by rendering various interconnected critical infrastructure systems inoperable. Although this vector of attack is vastly different from EMP, the attackers’ desired result is the same for a much smaller investment of resources. While nuclear EMP attacks incur massive costs due to the various technologies needed, a cyber-attack could theoretically require little more than an internet-connected computer and a sufficiently skilled attacker to have a similar effect [18].

Of course, these dangers have not gone unnoticed. The 2019 Presidential Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses has identified and empowered chief stakeholders in the challenge of U.S. EMP resilience, such as the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS), Energy (DoE), and Defense (DoD). Charged with spearheading the protection of U.S. critical infrastructure, DHS has recognized the need for unified research for risk assessments that support preparing the civilian sector [19]. Therefore, the United States Air Force (USAF) and Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) should work with DoD sister services and their respective research laboratories in strong partnership with DHS, academia, and industry to work toward critical infrastructure resilience to enemy EMP attacks.

It is concluded that these EMP weapons will not affect a wide area if directed at lower altitude of 25 miles because they will not release photons at high altitudes above the ground and can be used to cause a complete power outage on a local level and can be controlled remotely.

The question that imposes itself on the scene right now is what is the mechanism of the recent "pager" bombings in Lebanon, which led to the killing and wounding of thousands of innocent people? The answer is simply that it is an experimental operation for one of the applications of the electronic bomb, starting from Lebanon. The experiment succeeded in causing explosions in pager devices that are not connected to the Internet and the World Wide Web. So, what if the experiment was conducted on mobile cellphones and other electrical devices connected to World Wide Web applications, and thus it is easy to control them via the computer. In fact, the signal reception code was planted in the pager devices to control them, since the pager technology does not depend on the Internet or the satellite to monitor and control them remotely. From here, the intelligence roles of the company that manufactures the pager devices are disclosed, as it is considered a front for the Israeli Mossad. It is the one that planted the signal reception code in the pager devices, so it can receive the frequency of the bombing command signal because it is encrypted and prepared to receive this frequency, like the receiver device that can receive encoded channels.

Conclusion: The truth is that the recent pager bombings are not the first and will not be the last in the series of the satanic system that controls people and the planet. This could be accomplished by provoking wars and destruction, as in Gaza and Lebanon, and controlling the minds and consciousness of people by means of devil games and the electronic time bombs that are present in everywhere and available to all individuals, namely mobile cellphones! - There is no power or strength except with God, the Highest, the Almighty –

?

References.

1.???? Royal Air Force Common Core and Deployment Skills Aide-Memoire AP 3242B VOL 5, ABBREVIATIONS

2.???? Gutteridge, Nick (30 July 2020). "Electromagnetic pulses in history". The Telegraph. Retrieved 12 February 2023.

3.???? "DHS Combats Potential Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack". Department of Homeland Security. 3 September 2020. Retrieved 3 May 2021.

4.???? Weiss, Matthew; Weiss, Martin (29 May 2019). "An Assessment of Threats to the American Power Grid". Energy, Sustainability and Society. 9 (1): 18. doi:10.1186/s13705-019-0199-y. ISSN 2192-056.

5.???? "Protecting Personnel from Electromagnetic Fields", US Department of Defense Instruction No. 6055.11, 19 August 2009.

6.???? Edd Gent-Live Science Contributor 11 (March 2021). "US Air Force is guarding against electromagnetic pulse attacks. Should we worry?". livescience.com . Retrieved 2 May 2021.

7.???? Kopp, Carlo (October 1996). "The Electromagnetic Bomb - A Weapon of Electrical Mass Destruction". USAF CADRE Air Chronicles. DTIC: ADA332511. Archived from the original on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 12 January 2012.

8.???? Glasstone & Dolan 1977, Chapter 1.

9.???? Glasstone & Dolan 1977, Chapter 11, section 11.73.

10. ?Marks, Paul (1 April 2009). "Aircraft could be brought down by DIY 'E-bombs'". New Scientist. pp. 16–17.

11. ?Younger, Stephen; et al. (1996). "Scientific Collaborations Between Los Alamos and Arzamas-16 Using Explosive-Driven Flux Compression Generators" (PDF). Los Alamos Science (24): 48–71. Retrieved 24 October 2009.

12. ?Tom Harris.? How Electromagnetic Pulse Attacks Work. Updated: Apr 24, 2023, https://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb2.htm .

13. ?William J. Prest . Wave Guided Pulse Electromagnetic Pulse Beam. Updated: Nov 26, 2016. https://discover.hubpages.com/education/Wave-Guided-EMP-Beam .

14. Sten Odenwald, “The Day the Sun Brought Darkness”, Phys.org , March 31, 2009, https://phys.org/news/2009-03-day-sun-brought-darkness-wvideo.html .

?

15. ?Brian Gutierrez, “Why the U.S. Once Set Off a Nuclear Bomb in Space”, National Geographic, July 16, 2021, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/why-the-us-once-set-off-a-nuclear-bomb-in-space-called-starfish-prime ; Charles N. Vittitoe, Did High-Altitude EMP Cause the Hawaiian Streetlight Incident? (Albuquerque N.M. Oak Ridge Tenn: Sandia National Laboratories, 1989), https://ece-research.unm.edu/summa/notes/SDAN/0031.pdf ; Gilbert King, “Going Nuclear Over the Pacific”, Smithsonian Magazine, August, 15, 2012, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/going-nuclear-over-the-pacific-24428997/ .

?

16. Washington State Dept. of Health, “Electromagnetic Pulse Fact Sheet 320-090”, 2003, 3; Maj David Stuckenberg, R. James Woolsey, Douglas DeMaio, “Electromagnetic Defense Task Force 2.0 2019 Report” (Maxwell Air Force Base Alabama: Air University Press Curtis, 2019), https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AUPress/Papers/LP_0004_ELECTROMAGNETIC_DEFENSE_TASK_FORCE_2_2019.PDF .

17. ?Secretary of Defense, 2022 National Defense Strategy, III.

18. Thomas Scanlon, Andrew Boyle, Shawn Harris, Brandon Dunlap, “SolarWinds Fallout Has Execs Asking: How Secure is Our Supply Chain?,” BrightTALK, March 30, 2021, https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/13159/473104 .

19. ?“Executive Order 13865 of March 26, 2019, Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses” Federal Register, 84, no. 61 (March 29, 2019): 12041-12046, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/03/29/2019-06325/coordinating-national-resilience-to-electromagnetic-pulses ; U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Strategy for Protecting and Preparing the Homeland Against Threats of Electromagnetic Pulse and Geomagnetic Disturbances (Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security, 2018), https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/18_1009_EMP_GMD_Strategy-Non-Embargoed.pdf .

?

?