Learning Devices: Asset or Distraction? Balance is key.
David Flint
NPQH. Transforming Schools | Empowering Learners | Driving Excellence Globally. 20+ years of innovative leadership in diverse cultural settings specializing in personalized learning, strategic growth, and engagement.
As phones, tablets and laptops become ubiquitous in classrooms worldwide, a central question arises – do these devices enhance the learning process or derail it? Research offers reasons for both optimism and caution.
Several studies reveal technology's potential to actively engage students and improve outcomes. Secondary students in a 1:1 iPad program showed significant gains over peers without devices across all subjects studied (Foster, 2021). Likewise, a meta-analysis of 46 studies found incorporating laptops into lessons increased student participation, fostered skills in both locating and analyzing information, and offered effective differentiation (Tomas et al., 2022).
However, dangers of distraction loom large. Multitasking across just 2-3 digital platforms temporarily reduced information retention among adolescents by nearly 20% in a Stanford study (Paul et al., 2022). Likewise, analysis indicates students absorb less material passively on devices versus paper texts, requiring mitigation strategies (Delgado et al., 2018).?
It appears learning tools yield the greatest benefits when deliberately incorporated around defined goals. A literature review in Computers and Education noted devices helped high school math students grasp concepts through visualization apps, while university linguists developed stronger analysis skills through selective search/indexing tasks (Ng, 2022).?
领英推荐
In contrast, passive information delivery correlated with disengagement. Students reported mental fatigue from excessive screen time, especially long solitary assignments without interaction. As one noted, “Staring at slides tuning out – I just zombie through it.” (McNiell, 2021)
In summary, devices offer means both to tightly target instruction and inadvertently undermine its impact. The difference lies in intentional usage. With reasonable time limits, some self-directed learning opportunities, media thoughtfully embedded to illustrate complex topics, and group collaboration built into technology-based lessons, tools can become levers of meaningful engagement rather than weapons of mass distraction.?
Like any resource, learning devices require monitoring and management to fulfil their promise. But an outlook embracing their strengths while actively mitigating cons may offer educators the wisest path. The key words here, in my view, are guidance, exploration and ensuring sensible guard rails are put in place to ensure that usage is wholesome fuelling curiosity, analysis and linking of concepts and ideas so as to develop knowledge and skills.
Thought Leader in Educational AI, CEO Meteoredtech.com, safe & fully automated Pre-K to Grey Global F2F and Online Learning, in 30,000 schools September 2024 (£4.99 pcm)
1 年If we dont, then we arent preparing or kids for their present, never mind their future. Some super examples of internet blocking methods at Bett Global. We have to embrace it, but keep a safe fence around it too, that is easy in school.