Learn to Adapt
Mick Spiers
Experienced executive leader in Urban Mobility and Technology; Bestselling author
Lifelong leaders are lifelong learners. I set myself a goal to learn something new every day; every week; and every year.
One year ago, for International Women's Day, I wrote the following article:
I had the altruistic purpose of starting a debate and discussion on some of the factors that lead to the disgrace that is gender inequality in the workplace.
What I wasn't expecting (but am not upset by) is some of the controversy that it caused.
I will leave you to read the article but the headline is that, in at least part of the article, I was encouraging women to be bolder and more assertive in their career aspirations and compared the different ways that men and women approach applying for, and interview for, a job. The underlying premise is that women would tend to not apply for a role where they don't fit all of the selection criteria and that men would apply even if they only met half. This is a generalisation and all generalisations are unfair; some are useful.
The theory is that this creates an in-built imbalance in the recruiting funnel that then filters through to gender imbalance in the organisation.
So, where did the controversy come in and what did I learn from that experience? A key question that was posed to me by someone I admire, "why should we change, shouldn't we just be ourselves?".
This made me stop and think and challenge more than just the core topic. For example, why do recruiters and hiring managers put out a shopping list of selection criteria instead of a targeted list of just the essential criteria? Rather than asking women to be more assertive, should we be asking men to be more humble?
So, for International Women's Day 2021, I #choosetochallenge and ask you all to consider, who and what needs to change to make a meaningful impact to gender balance and inequity.
What action will you to take to address this issue once and for all? The collective actions of all us will result in big change. We must believe and we must act.
Should women really be asked to "Learn to Adapt" or should it be the system and society that makes the shift? Shouldn't we put a higher value on authenticity? In many respects the recruiting and interviewing environment is abstracted from reality in any case. The more we can create a process and approach that allows someone to just be themselves, the better we would be able to assess key attributes such as attitude, aptitude and culture fit.
I leave you with these thoughts the next time you are applying for, or recruiting for, a new role. What are your unconscious biases in that process (as both applicant and recruiter)? How do you put those biases aside? How can we create a process that values authenticity above all else?
For your consideration.
#choosetochallenge #IWD2021 #Leaderhip #TheLeadershipProject #recruiting #genderbalance #equality
Director, US Operations and a fan of good design
4 年Great update from last year, Mick, thank you. The women protesting today in the UK and Australia are being heard. If the system is broken, we must put 100% of our energy into fixing the system; don't ask people to adapt to the broken system.
I help founders grow brands through community.
4 年Love the article short and concise Mick Spiers! I don’t think women should learn to adept. Work is work. People are people. Results are still results. It really doesn’t matter on gender I feel. People. People should adept. But this can only happen when we stop seeing gender as a qualification of output. It really, really doesn’t matter! Also did up a quick video with my team to talk about this. https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/cvpgroup_its-a-wrap-49-8-march-12-march-2021-activity-6776096773200072704-GrXY Tell me what you think! ??
Global Product Director at Cubic Transportation Systems
4 年Hi Mick, thought-provoking perspective. You used the term authenticity, which seems key.?Great teams seem to be both diverse and built on authenticity, an environment that enables everyone to play to their strengths, equally, rather than feel a need to adapt. The “job description” seems the first barrier to authenticity, with role descriptions that can be poor at best, and focused on a point role rather than the team and authenticity.
Software Development
4 年I sense you are in favor of Equality of Outcome.. What do you mean by workforce? Which industry?
Head of Bids at Hitachi Rail
4 年love it, Mick! I am asking myself if the biases that we have are really in fact "unconscious"