Leaping forward: technology changes of the 2021-2023 innovation cycle
Igor Grubisic
Cloud Transformation Director | Enterprise Architect | Technology Innovator | Creative Negotiator | AI Data Bias & Lean AI Strategist | Marathon Runner and Rescue Diver
For industry professionals, it is (relatively) straightforward to pinpoint the general direction that will influence the next technology innovation cycle. Everyone, from those like Accenture, the Big Four, IBM, Microsoft, Google, to startups talk about the high-level technology trends that can be roughly summarized and phrased into the following:
However, what does this mean for the upcoming 2021-2023 technology innovation cycle? What particular changes can we expect to see that are part of these generalized trend-envisioned statements?
Paul Daugherty, Accenture’s Technology & Chief Technology Officer, in his intriguing article “Our Giant Fast-Forward” addresses the next innovation cycle differently by breaking it into four new realities: human experience, technology, work, and sustainability. Daugherty further expands these realities into five general trends (https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/our-giant-fast-forward-paul-daugherty/). Though Daugherty envisions the democratization of technology, we are, staggeringly, still living in a largely insufficiently digital world. As Daugherty rightfully noted, “the future has arrived, but we haven’t caught up yet”. Pandemic has opened our eyes with a harsh reality check – technologically speaking, most of the world is under- or inadequately digitally developed. I am not talking about the third-world countries, but about developed economies like America, Western Europe, and similar. Take, for example, mobile broadband in Germany or the lack of it. During the annual summit of Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) (German Informatics Society) a few years ago, one of the members expressed his disbelief how in the base of Hawaii’s volcano (where he was spending his vacation) he had the full LTE data reception, but merely an EDGE in the middle of Berlin. The situation is unchanged to this day, and I can second that with a personal experience from the rural areas of Montenegro, versus the same in Berlin. Another example is the US, which started adopting contactless card payment years after many European countries had it by default. There are more similar examples.
Before the pandemic the world was buzzing about the Industry 4.0 and digitalization, with businesses aiming to achieve full digitalization in the next five to ten years. The gold-mine for consulting and system integration vendors. The pandemic sped it up, however, acting as a catalyst to digitalization. The silver lining to this “new reality” is that we will witness the completion of a lion’s share of the digitalization within the next one to three years. Therefore, before pursuing any of the aforementioned trends, the first and foremost task in 2021 and beyond is the continued digitalization and digital transformation. This is the baseline for any new and emerging technology direction.
But even before the pandemic, while information technology companies were buzzing about the Industry X.0, the environment started changing more rapidly, with ever-decreasing innovation cycles. As Tim Wagner, an ex-Accenture ventures principal and innovator, rightfully noted, the X.0 model worked for the early days of technology when we had Web 2.0, Industry 3.0, and similar. However, nowadays the technology environment is too fast and converging, so that model does not make as much sense anymore. There are too many versatile innovations and technology revolutions to group them in a focused designation like the Industry X.0. Instead of focusing on fixed cycles, we need a more dynamic way of talking about converging technologies. Designations like Industry X.0 are arbitrary when multiple threads of hardware and software are advancing at different paces while influencing what is possible. X.0 is a placeholder to say change is happening, and we should adopt a flexible digital foundation that assumes change.
Back to the main question: what does all the aforementioned mean for the upcoming 2021-2023 technology innovation cycle, i.e. what concrete technology and innovation challenges and changes can we expect to affect our lives the most as part of the aforementioned trend predictions?
Cybersecurity and privacy:
领英推荐
Financial Services industry:
Legal frameworks:
Wellbeing and lifestyle:?
AI directions:
While there are many other changes to consider as part of the current innovation cycle, the above list is what I would keep an eye on. And what realistic trends and changes can we expect beyond 2021-2023 in the next innovation cycle? In addition to the aforementioned trends, it is reasonable to expect further development of the augmented and virtual reality, emerging video, additional process manufacturing automation and optimization (like the already announced Mercedes’s fully automated factory), first commercial applications of quantum computing, possibly one of them even combining AI and climate change predictions (I do not foresee any noteworthy effects of the environmental efforts in 2021-2023 cycle though), new batteries with much larger capacities and lifespan, and finally, a decline in cloud adoption, due to saturation.
As a final thought, innovation equals evolution, ever-changing and adapting, with innovation cycles becoming increasingly shorter, sometimes changing the direction mid-cycle. Therefore, we ought not to take the above opinions as de facto and unchangeable, but more as a guideline on how the general technology trends might tangibly impact our lives, over the upcoming years.?