Lean: the difference between work climate & work culture

Lean: the difference between work climate & work culture

I get calls from companies these days who are struggling with the amount of discontinuous change caused by technologies, new business models coupled with unprecedented pressures to upgrade the skills of people just to keep up let alone excel.

In addition the way organizations have to connect to other organizations around the world, even for temporary purposes simply to maintain daily delivery, have blown apart the whole notion of nice, solid steady value streams.

The implications of all this constant, rapid change are profound and far reaching for the management of staff, the work design, measurement systems, people development and reward systems. Simply put, the old management models and thinking are obsolete.

Lean Management has now come of age with its fixation on the customer and enabling staff to continuously innovate and change the business. It’s an on-demand, continuous change system but unfortunately some businesses settle for far less by using Lean and Agile just to improve a few processes. That’s fine, but there’s so much more potential.

Some years ago, an organizational transformation in Lean typically took about four years. But my organizational transformation process is now down to eighteen months because we use a diagnostic based on behaviour and something called 'the work-climate'. It has significant implications for how we design, build and operate organizations.

What is this behaviour-focused diagnostic looking at?  Well, we start with the work climate. Social scientists have been looking at work climates for many years and have demonstrated the effects of attitudes on certain work outcomes.

It was a revelation to me that we could actually understand the impact of the operating strategy, the structures, the managing practices and how we make decisions by examining the perceptions, feelings and behaviours of staff at every level of the organisation. The data provided a deep insight into the disconnects and misalignment of management thinking and pointed to alternative better approaches.

An adaptive trusting climate drives collaboration. Everybody thinks you can put people into a room, have them band together to solve a problem and that’s collaboration.  It’s not.  Collaboration is all about reciprocity.  Do you trust me and can I trust you?  If so, we’ll get along and be able to collaborate as long as we are connected to the real needs of customers.

An adaptive work climate needs to focus on 'engaging'- how we understand the deep needs of customers, Learning- how we collaborate end to end to meet customer needs, 'Leading'- how we devolve decision making to the point of interaction with the customer and lastly 'improving' - do staff have the authority and the methods to change how work is delivered to customers to meet their needs.

Is there good leadership? A challenging environment?, Enough freedom and decision making?  Do we share intelligence within our team? Within our function?  When do we see our senior management?  All of this gives rise to the work climate.

Work climate is entirely different to culture.  A culture takes a long time to establish, but once ingrained, proves very difficult to shift. The twist is that all cultures start off as a work climate that have sustained for a long periods of time.

Work climates can change very rapidly. There could be a good climate in an organization but when a new manager enters the mix with a strict focus on the numbers restricting freedom and locks everything down the climate changes rapidly but has the culture of the organization changed?  Probably not.

But if that manager keeps going like that for a sufficient length of time, it becomes ‘the way we work around here’.  So the toughest challenge for Lean and Agile transformations is changing the climate long enough so it becomes the culture.

It could be a toxic climate or a really productive climate but the secret to creating and maintaining an adaptive climate is management trustworthiness - can staff trust you?

Building trust between managers and staff is the path to real Lean and Agile organizations. Trust allows freedom, choice and the power to do what matters for customers through the willing contribution of staff and managers alike.

Stop trying to change cultures and start trying to change climates.

Jason ?? Cortassa

Leader {??} Technologist @DellTechnologies

7 年

Great article, Mr. Perry. Thank you for giving a much needed perspective to those who are just plain confused and proper analogies that convey the message appropriately. More please!

Ken Dixon

COO-CFO at Fusion Design Consultants, Inc.

8 年

I think this is a very helpful piece. You've taken two terms or concepts commonly used, interchanged, but not understood specifically enough to manage; and provided specific variables and codified language so they can be distinguished and managed productively. Nice job.

Tadeusz Kifner

Digital Transformation Leader & Lecturer - Innovations, Architecture, IT Governance, Security

9 年

Very good point of view. I would only ask you about your vision in relation to habits. As I am observing work climates seams to be dependent on habits more than on team collaboration and trust. What kind of techniques in your opinion is good to use to rebuild climate when organizational habits are very strong?

Harvey Leach

Equipping operational teams to achieve “high performance with ease.” Better, faster and lower cost with less effort to enable organisations and individuals to flourish.

9 年

Stephen, great article that clearly articulates the difference yet the link between the two. I was first introduced to this idea of "climate" a couple of years ago by one of my clients (funny how they teach us as well as us teaching them) and it really helped me think more clearly on this whole topic. His analogy was a tree - the roots are the culture, the leaves show the "health" (engagement and behaviour) and the climate - wind, rain, sun etc - created by what the leaders do.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了