Leadership, Readiness, and the Power of Sponsorship

Leadership, Readiness, and the Power of Sponsorship

In both politics and business, individuals are often promoted or elected into positions for which they may not be fully prepared. Despite this, they are given the opportunity because someone in authority takes a leap of faith, believing in their potential. This phenomenon of leaders being “thrown into the deep end” is evident in the debate surrounding Kamala Harris’s readiness to become U.S. president, and in comparison to Donald Trump’s rise to the presidency. While some question Harris’s qualifications, examining her political experience relative to Trump’s prior to their respective elections reveals interesting insights into how leadership readiness is perceived. More importantly, this discussion offers lessons for the business world, where leaders often emerge under similar circumstances—unprepared yet supported by those who believe in their growth potential.

The Case of Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump: Who is More Ready?

Kamala Harris has faced criticism from some quarters about her readiness to step into the role of U.S. president, particularly as the current vice president. Before her vice presidency, Harris served as a U.S. senator and California attorney general, roles that gave her considerable political experience. However, some argue that her record does not compare to other seasoned political figures who have assumed the presidency. Harris’s critics suggest that her relatively short tenure in national politics leaves her unprepared for the country’s highest office.

Contrast this with Donald Trump, who had no political experience before winning the Republican Party’s nomination and later the U.S. presidency in 2016. Prior to his presidency, Trump’s career was in business, with no prior service in the U.S. House of Representatives or the Senate. Many argued that Trump’s outsider status, while appealing to some, left him unprepared for the complexities of governing. Despite these concerns, Trump completed a full term as president and now has four years of presidential experience under his belt.

When comparing Harris to Trump at the moment they first ascended to national prominence, Harris clearly had more political experience. Her roles in the Senate and as attorney general involved policymaking, legal interpretation, and navigating the intricacies of government, skills that are traditionally seen as crucial for a president. Trump, on the other hand, had built his career on business deals and media presence, leveraging his outsider status as a strength.

Now, in 2024, Trump has four years of presidential experience, while Harris has four years as vice president. Both have taken their leadership to new levels, learning from the pressures and responsibilities of their offices. Who is better qualified? While Trump has the advantage of having already served as president, Harris’s experience in the Senate and vice presidency give her insights into both legislative processes and the workings of the executive branch. Ultimately, both have faced the challenge of stepping into leadership roles where some questioned their readiness.

Business Leaders and the Deep End: Learning on the Job

This same dynamic occurs in the business world. Many leaders are promoted into roles where they lack direct experience. Rather than being fully prepared, they are often thrust into high-stakes situations because someone in authority—their sponsor or mentor—sees potential and takes a leap of faith. This is not dissimilar to starting a family; most couples have no prior experience in running a family, yet they jump in, sometimes succeeding and sometimes failing. The support structures around them—family, mentors, peers—often determine whether they thrive in their new roles.

In business, leaders often succeed because they receive mentorship, guidance, and support from others who have been in similar positions. When a leader is thrown into the deep end, they are forced to adapt quickly, making decisions in real time while learning on the job. This baptism by fire can be daunting, but it can also be a powerful catalyst for growth. Just as political figures like Harris and Trump were mentored and guided by those around them, business leaders often lean on the expertise of others to navigate unfamiliar waters.

The Role of Sponsors and Mentors in Leadership

One of the key factors that allows unprepared leaders to succeed is sponsorship. A sponsor is someone who actively advocates for an individual, promoting them to higher positions and giving them opportunities they may not have otherwise had. In politics, we see this when party figures or influential leaders endorse candidates who lack traditional qualifications but show promise. In business, senior executives often sponsor younger leaders, helping them rise through the ranks by providing them with exposure, opportunities, and critical feedback.

Mentorship is another essential component. While sponsors advocate for someone’s promotion, mentors provide the practical advice and emotional support needed to succeed. For Harris, figures like Joe Biden and Barack Obama have likely played mentoring roles, offering counsel based on their years in the highest offices of government. Trump, though positioned as an outsider, also relied on a network of advisers and political insiders to guide his decisions in office.

In business, mentors play a similar role. Leaders who are promoted before they are “ready” often depend on mentors to help them develop the necessary skills and knowledge. These mentors provide a sounding board for decision-making, share their experiences, and help new leaders avoid common pitfalls. Over time, the combination of sponsorship and mentorship can transform an unprepared leader into a successful one.

The Leap of Faith: A Necessary Ingredient for Leadership Development

Whether in politics or business, the decision to appoint someone who may not be fully prepared is often a leap of faith. Leaders grow by being placed in challenging positions, where they are forced to stretch beyond their current capabilities. This leap of faith is essential for leadership development, as it encourages innovation, growth, and resilience. As Kamala Harris and Donald Trump illustrate, readiness for leadership is often less about experience and more about the ability to learn, adapt, and rise to the occasion once the opportunity presents itself.

For business leaders, this insight is invaluable. Rather than waiting for the “perfect candidate” who checks every box, organizations should focus on individuals who show potential and provide them with the necessary support to succeed. Leaders should be willing to take calculated risks in promoting others, understanding that growth often happens when individuals are pushed beyond their comfort zones.

Conclusion: Readiness is Relative

The debate about whether Kamala Harris is ready to be president or whether Donald Trump was prepared for the role in 2016 highlights a broader truth: leadership readiness is often relative. No one is ever fully prepared for the responsibilities that come with leading a country, a company, or a family. What matters is the support, mentorship, and opportunities provided to leaders, enabling them to grow into their roles. In politics, business, and life, success often comes not from being fully ready but from having the courage to step into the unknown, backed by a network of supporters who believe in the leader’s potential.

Reference

  1. S. Todd, K.J. Harris, R.B. Harris, et al., “Career Success Implications of Political Skill,” The Journal of Social Psychology 149, no. 3 (July 2009): 279-304;
  2. G.R. Ferris, B.P. Ellen III, C.P. McAllister, et al., “Reorganizing Organizational Politics Research: A Review of the Literature and Identification of Future Research Directions,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 6 (January 2019): 299-323.
  3. D. Wilkie, “Women Know Mentors Are Key, so Why Don’t They Have Them?” Society for Human Resource Management, April 14, 2014, https://blog.shrm.org .
  4. “Women in the Workplace 2020,” PDF file (McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.org , October 2020), https://womenintheworkplace.com .

Penny Xolisile M.

Inclusive Leader|Head of Alternative Channels: Coverage & Innovation | Independent Non -Executive Director Institute of Bankers SA| Keynote Speaker|???Talk Show Host: HotSeatWithPenzola

2 个月

Vhutshilo Anna Nesamari , you have to read this article

Motsieloa Alexander Nonyane

Acting Head of Retail Life Distribution at Metropolitan Lesotho

2 个月

Great advice!

回复
Livingstone Mulaudzi

MSc(Eng) | MBL | PrEng | MSAIMechE | Naamsa HCV Division | Wits MIA Industry Advisory Committee

2 个月

Very insightful

回复
Jabulani Khumalo MBA MIT

Chief Information Officer (CIO) at Bidvest Prestige | Exec | Driving Innovation, Digital Transformation, and Operational Excellence | Strategic Leader in IT Solutions for Enhanced Client Experience

2 个月

Insightful!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Thabo Mosala的更多文章

  • Constructivist Coaching Approach

    Constructivist Coaching Approach

    In this approach, the coach helps Marcus Lang explore and reshape his understanding of leadership, moving from a rigid,…

    2 条评论
  • Integrating Theory into Practice

    Integrating Theory into Practice

    Marcus Lang’s controlling behavior in his role as CEO can be understood through several intersecting psychological…

  • Case Study: CEO Obsession and Investor Dilemma at Dynatech Engineering

    Case Study: CEO Obsession and Investor Dilemma at Dynatech Engineering

    Dynatech Engineering, a leading innovator in high-tech manufacturing equipment, rose to industry prominence under its…

    1 条评论
  • Conversation Between Alex and His Colleague: Exploring Adaptive Leadership

    Conversation Between Alex and His Colleague: Exploring Adaptive Leadership

    After his meeting with Jane, Alex felt he needed guidance on handling conflicts more effectively, not just with Jane…

    1 条评论
  • What exactly is Adaptive Leadership?

    What exactly is Adaptive Leadership?

    Adaptive Leadership is a leadership model that emphasizes the importance of flexibility, resilience, and learning to…

    2 条评论
  • Case Study: The Dynamics of Conflict in the Workplace

    Case Study: The Dynamics of Conflict in the Workplace

    Context In a bustling marketing firm, where competition is fierce and deadlines are tight, Jane, the head of a project…

    8 条评论
  • Showing Vulnerability as a Critical Leadership Tool

    Showing Vulnerability as a Critical Leadership Tool

    In today’s rapidly changing work environments, leaders like Sarah ( we encountered her in the past two articles), face…

    2 条评论
  • Coaching Engagement

    Coaching Engagement

    Sarah Kim, COO, has built a strong reputation for her results-driven leadership style. However, her reluctance to show…

    6 条评论
  • Case Study: The Path to Vulnerability

    Case Study: The Path to Vulnerability

    Background Sarah Kim is a 48-year-old Chief Operating Officer (COO) of a mid-sized technology firm. Known for her…

    5 条评论
  • Case Study: The Reluctant Leader - James Martin

    Case Study: The Reluctant Leader - James Martin

    Background: James Martin is a mid-level manager in a large technology company’s software development department…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了