Leadership in Focus

Leadership in Focus

There’s an easy narrative to be told about recent market turbulence. It says that the jitters we saw in late July and early August were merely the reflection of traditional summer illiquidity. Traders on the beach saw that Goldman Sachs had increased their estimates of the likelihood of a US recession and panicked (FWIW, Goldman just managed that estimate back down post US retail sales and jobs numbers…) Or, as I wrote just as the first tremors were being felt in the markets, there was a lot of fast money concentrated in two key areas: the JPY carry trade and Mag 7 stocks. The unwind of the former led to a period of weakness in the latter. Now we’re back to where we were, with a return to a world of soft-landing optimism and AI-fueled excitement. A brief perusal of the S&P500 would seem to confirm this thesis.

I think there’s an argument that you don’t experience the kind of volatility we have witnessed over the past few weeks without it being indicative of deeper-moving currents. My friend and colleague Ed Cole pointed this out in our markets meeting this week – there appears to be the first stirrings of a subtle but unavoidable shift in leadership. If we look at the extent to which different elements of the market have recouped their recent losses, a pattern becomes clear. I rank them here from those that recovered the least to those that have recovered the most. SOX, by the way, is the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, a useful proxy for the Mag 7.

What can we draw from this analysis? Firstly, I'd point out that, before the wholesale capitulation of early August, we were beginning to see the first suggestions of a move from a prolonged episode of concentration to a more broad-based period of performance. You can see this in the chart below, which compares the July price movement of the SOX with the Russell 2000 index.

It may be that the ructions of August merely interrupted the playing out of a broader market rotation. Or it may be that they precipitated them. One way of reading the moves we’ve seen in markets over recent months is that fast money pulled out of both the yen carry trade and the Mag 7 just at the point that a more significant shift was taking place in the markets. It looks to us as though the fast money has returned to the Mag 7, but that there is still – as the chart below illustrates – the sense of another dynamic in operation (ASX is a global all-share index).

The fast money proved itself evanescent in the face of selling pressure in recent weeks; it may be that the run up in the Mag 7 has even less behind it in the post-volatility era.

It all brings us back to one of my favorite topics: regimes. As the inflationary regime shift played out over the past few years, you might have imagined that the growth/value dialectic never existed. Now people are talking about growth and value again. It's not a simple narrative: falling rates benefit growth as future cash flows are discounted at lower rates; a weakening economic picture might support value (or at least the more defensive elements of the value universe). If a change in leadership really is taking place, it's doing so against an economic backdrop that is not wholly supportive of such a move (which to my mind makes it all the more interesting). One to watch closely in the weeks ahead.



Paul Gibson, CAIA

Investment Writer, Storyteller and Analyst

7 个月

Completely not buying your argument, Steven. I have rescently made 1994 parallels. There is no comparison. I don't have a fancy job title and I don't even have a job right niw. But I am a wise sage. The only way forward for the stock market is the massively overdue bear! And it starts with Jackson Hole!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Steven Desmyter的更多文章

  • Regimes, Revisited

    Regimes, Revisited

    There was a time when the word “regime” conjured images of French dynasties rather than financial markets. Then Covid…

    6 条评论
  • 5 Questions With... Neuro 11

    5 Questions With... Neuro 11

    I've written before about our work with neuro11. I first came across them when I read about their work with Liverpool…

    3 条评论
  • 5 Questions with Steven: Eliot Higgins

    5 Questions with Steven: Eliot Higgins

    Eliot Higgins spoke at our MAIS CIO conference in Oxford in 2022. The conflict in Ukraine was fresh in our minds and…

  • DeepSeek: The Starter Gun for Physical AI Just Got Fired

    DeepSeek: The Starter Gun for Physical AI Just Got Fired

    What DeepSeek Means for Robotics There was a nice piece by the great economist Daron Acemoglu in the FT the other day…

    6 条评论
  • 5 Questions with Steven: Professor Adam Kucharski

    5 Questions with Steven: Professor Adam Kucharski

    When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, Adam Kucharski, Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at the London School of…

    1 条评论
  • LA Wildfires: Cat Bonds and the California Insurance Crisis

    LA Wildfires: Cat Bonds and the California Insurance Crisis

    Even as the scale of the challenge presented by the climate crisis has become increasingly evident, much of the world…

  • 5 Questions with Steven: Peter Frankopan

    5 Questions with Steven: Peter Frankopan

    One of the many MAIS events that really stuck in my mind was the talk given by Professor Peter Frankopan at Kirtlington…

    2 条评论
  • Across Disciplines: Frameworks for Investment Thinking

    Across Disciplines: Frameworks for Investment Thinking

    There was an interesting back and forth on X the other day in which US academics debated the “seriousness” of economics…

    15 条评论
  • 5 Questions with Steven: Dr Sophie Bostock

    5 Questions with Steven: Dr Sophie Bostock

    As far as resolutions for the year ahead, many of us would benefit from an increased focus on the quality of our sleep.…

    3 条评论
  • 5 Questions with Steven: Campbell R. Harvey

    5 Questions with Steven: Campbell R. Harvey

    Campbell Harvey is Professor of Finance at Duke University - The Fuqua School of Business and a Research Associate of…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了