Leadership 101: An 8-Point Lesson Plan for Restoring Campus Civility This Fall

Leadership 101: An 8-Point Lesson Plan for Restoring Campus Civility This Fall

There's no way around it: last year, far too many campus deans, presidents, and administrators did not receive a passing grade in leadership. This fall, just as a struggling student would, they must improve their performance to retain their place at their prestigious institutions. Specifically, that means overseeing campuses where free speech and diverse ideas thrive alongside respect and civility.

Campus leaders should follow this eight-step lesson plan, assembled from best practices proven effective on campuses nationwide, to restore control and create a welcoming environment for all students.

  1. Eliminate Double Standards: Fairness and consistency aren’t electives—they should be the foundation of leadership. Apply the same rules to everyone, without exception or bias. Without consistency, a leader's legitimacy is nearly impossible to maintain. It did not go unnoticed that many of the same schools that supported and enforced preferred speech codes, enabled cancel culture, and implemented microaggression and sensitivity training for professors suddenly allowed free speech to be a viable defense for hateful rhetoric and open discrimination on campus.?
  2. Enforce the Rules, With Real Consequences: Most campuses prohibited encampments, but these rules quickly lost meaning when administrators failed to enforce them. This inaction emboldened students to push boundaries, escalating their behavior. This lack of action emboldened students to push boundaries, leading to more aggressive behavior. Schools like the University of Florida, which made consequences clear from the start , maintained safer and more respectful environments. As we head into fall, some schools have outlined clearer prohibited behaviors, but the real challenge will be their commitment to enforcement. When a suspended group violates that suspension, the individuals involved should face suspension or expulsion. Moreover, administrators must stop negotiating with rule-breakers, as it only invites further misconduct. Finally, allowing student representatives to exonerate peers further undermines the administration’s authority to enforce its own rules.
  3. Enforce Time and Place Restrictions: One person's rights should never infringe upon another's. Students deserve the freedom to learn, sleep, and attend events, including speakers and graduation ceremonies, without harassment, disruption or interference. The right to protest does not extend to disrupting others' educational experiences. Specifically, diplomas should be withheld from those who disrupt graduations. ?
  4. Make Tough Decisions Early: Avoiding difficult decisions upfront only leads to compounded problems and forces tougher choices later. Leaders must act decisively before campus protests spiral out of control, as seen at Columbia this past spring. Failing to do so undermines the administration's authority and control.
  5. No Masked Protests: Student protestors should not be allowed to hide behind masks. Concealing identities fosters bad behavior and undermines accountability. Allowing protesters to hide their faces eliminates the fear of consequences, which can easily lead to increased violence and misconduct. If students want to take a stand for their principles, they should be willing to put their face to it—this will encourage protestors to act with greater integrity and responsibility.
  6. Protect Private Property: Most college campuses are private property, and campus leaders are not obligated to allow non-students to incite violence or vandalize property as they did this spring, actions that caused millions of dollars in damage. Individuals who disrupt campus life and cannot present a valid student ID should be immediately escorted off campus. Local law enforcement should be called upon to assist if campus security cannot enforce this policy.
  7. Reinforce Values: Leaders must firmly and unequivocally denounce behaviors that conflict with their schools’ stated values, especially if the violated behavior is rooted in hate and intimidation. While certain expressions may be protected by free speech, a university is not obligated to condone such behavior in classrooms or on campus. Students and professors unwilling to adhere to their institutions’ values should seek a different place to teach or study.
  8. Lead from the Front: Leadership isn’t about issuing statements from the safety of your office. True leaders must be visible, actively engaged, and ready to take control. In times of crisis, step out, take charge, and lead from the front with presence and proactive action.

Following these principles will help leaders create a campus environment where protest and free speech coexist without one person's rights trampling another's, allowing everyone to enjoy their educational experience without harassment. This fall, we’ll see which leaders and campuses earn top marks—or get a failing grade.

Robert Glazer is a serial entrepreneur, award-winning executive, bestselling author, and keynote speaker. He has a passion for helping individuals and organizations build their capacity and elevate their performance.

Learn more at www.robertglazer.com

JOHN KIPRONO

chief county nursing officer at minstry of health

2 个月

Very helpful!

回复
Jill Beck (Consor)

Founder of Go Long – Making life after 40 unapologetically awesome. Thriving with three autoimmune diseases. No gimmicks. No BS. Just straight talk. Featured in WSJ.

2 个月

In most cases, the loudest and most destructive agitators have been people not affiliated with these universities. More proactive policing on who is on campus can also go a long way.

回复
Ravi Prakash

Global Service Delivery Leader | Digital Transformation Executive| Driving Customer Success & Business Growth | Keynote Speaker & Author

3 个月

Robert Glazer Let us empower our university administrators to lead with integrity, free from the interference of political forces in Washington DC or anywhere else. Our academic communities must be given the autonomy to address and resolve their own challenges. Yes, we must strive to eliminate double standards, not just within our universities but across the entire nation. It's painfully clear that some groups are consistently valued over others, no matter the rhetoric. As long as identity politics dominate the conversation, meaningful change will remain elusive—whether on campus, in our country, or on a global scale. Let’s be honest: the world today is starved for transformational leadership. We cannot expect our universities to single-handedly solve these deep-rooted issues when our global leadership itself is lacking. Where are the leaders who can stand shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, or Martin Luther King Jr.? Sadly, they are few and far between. Too many are content with maintaining the status quo, playing into identity politics to secure their positions. It’s on us to demand more, to foster the kind of leadership that transcends politics and prioritizes genuine progress.

Dr. Shawn Foley

Strategist | Performance Management | Metrics Pioneer | ROI Explorer | Impact Seeker | Process Improver | Change Manager

3 个月

I agree on the leadership points -- #1, #2, #4, #8 & #6 & #7 (when hate, crime, & intimidation are involved ... and, not when student actions are protected by values expressed in our Constitution) My counter points are regarding #3 & #5. The Framers specifically address time, place, & anonymity (privacy) as critical to the protection of oppositional voices & grievances. Those aspects, when protected, allow for constructive and peaceful petitioning by a group with shared interests. Especially when a group represents a minority or unpopular opinion in public. Universities are not just places to become better educated or to get a degree while you shuffle past the issues of the day uninterrupted. They are places where the strength of rhetoric & peaceful petition is studied & welcomed; where shared points & counterpoints come together; and where minority voices are encouraged & celebrated rather than suppressed. Let us avoid introducing the kind of bureaucracy our Founding Fathers confronted when petitioning Parliament, the Lord Chancellor, and the King. Instead ... let us introduce support ... a la Thomas Jefferson ... for a little disruption & disturbance now & again as a good thing. As a rule. So long as it is peaceful.?

回复
Tamar Balkin

Executive Coach, Endorsed Organisational Psychologist, AHPRA (Australia Health Practitioner Regulation Agency)

3 个月

Thank you. Your wise words are relevant internationally and in many sectors beyond tertiary education.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了