Leaders and managers are flying too high to see what is happening on the ground
Recall your last cross-country flight: As you took off you could look down and gradually gain an increasingly broad perspective of the lay of the land. In fact, (I did some checking) at around 1000ft you can see just under 40miles... Assuming clear skies, you can see the distance between landmarks, and the roads that connect them, and think things like, "Ha! It looks to me like those plots of land will be the next ones to snap-up - They are just on the outskirts and have a big highway leading right to them."
[Well, that is what I always find myself thinking, but I am also the kid who thought I would one day parachute out of a plane with an upside-down jar so that I could capture a piece of cloud to put on the shelf... Nice kid, no brains.]
The thing about flying is that at some point you get so high that the detail becomes abstract (Call it 2000 feet). You can see that you are over land, the main roads, but you can't make out the nature of buildings and the unique geographic features.
Leaders need to adjust their altitude frequently
When I ask a leader to explain what is happening operationally in the business, I will get two answers:
1) Here is the playbook/manual/process guide that everyone adheres to
2) Here is the dashboard/summary report that I use to see what is happening
Here's a big surprise for you:
1) The playbook/manual/process guide hasn't been looked at since the initial roll-out or onboarding.
2) That dashboard/summary doesn't give you actionable insight, it just tells you (sometimes) where you need to double-click (drill down to inspect further). I say "sometimes" because I have many examples where reality is distorted at a dashboard level:
Dashboards and summary reports tell you where to look, not what to do. They are like flying at 2000 feet - If you are looking to grow veggies, you are looking for an arable field - If you see it at 2000 feet, it might look fine, but if you drop down to 500 feet, you see it is a muddy, undrainable swamp...
What to do differently
Here is how I know there is a problem - I ask a leader a question about managing to a KPI. EG: How do you know that your people are spending time on their highest potential opportunities - They will usually pull up a 'Hygiene' dashboard and show me all opportunities with no activity in more than 2 weeks.
No good.
I then ask them to pick the top deals for the quarter and we drill in to see the last activity and see a call logged, "Called, left voicemail'... No good.
领英推荐
Here is what I coach people to do (And you can collaborate on at SKO to get alignment across leaders, regardless of function (Sales/Marketing/Product/etc)
Write down all your leading indicators of success and then what health looks like at the 500ft level eg:
Leading indicator: Pipeline coverage of 4.5X
500ft level: At least 80% of the quarter is from run-rate business. Every deal is currently in a stage (validly selected) that allows time to close in this quarter.
Then ask yourself, how do I see if that is true, conveniently enough that I can inspect weekly if I want?
A quick way to lose the confidence of your exec
We are heading into a new fiscal year - Planning is happening now, and soon QBRs will also be. The quickest way to lose your leadership's confidence is not to know the answers to:
I can't tell you how often I meet VPs and L1/L2 managers who lose their jobs because they have bee flying in the clouds and oblivious to the reality of what is happening on the ground.
You have heard it before:
"Inspect what you expect."
Some things to know about me:
Author ?? NEARBOUND // Entrepreneur // ( )pening Education
1 年Yes, absolutely, same goes for the customer. Most execs are so focused on activities from their ivory towers they don’t know where their customers are trying to go. They only know the world as they imagine it designed. Unfortunately, reality soon calls. Their unit economics aren’t a plan. Economics just tell the truth. And there’s a fatal conceit - as Nobel Prize economist Hayek said: “The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to [us] how little we know about what we imagine we can design.” If that doesn’t hurt, it should. The go-to-market strategy lacks living-in-market context. As is also said “the map is not the territory.” Zoom in. Zoom out too, but roads to revenue ain’t paved from onlookers on-high from ivory towers…
?? Immigration Attorney for Businesses, Entrepreneurs, & Families | Mentor at Dartmouth's Magnuson Center for Entrepreneurship
1 年Excellent article Matt! Began reading just as my flight was taking off from Auckland, so, handy illustration of your point right outside the window. Hello from down here!
Revenue Leader, Advising and Scaling Global B2B SaaS Companies, Board Director.
1 年Totally agree Matt Cameron. Too many sales leaders "sit inside" and look at the data and think they know whats going on. Many years ago I was taught to "inspect what you expect" and my mentor who was a CEO, showed me how important it was to regularly go several layers deep to find out what was happening. eg he said when he spent a half day/day with a sales person he really found out what was going on.
Agentforce Tableau Global Systems Integrator Leader @ Salesforce |
1 年love it. Focus and priorities are foundational elements needed. Scale and time are the issues. Big difference between coaching reps and managers/leaders as where to spend their time and what to do.
Focused on helping founders build great business software companies. Devoted father, tonal zealot, and unprofessional storyteller.
1 年preach brother man, preach