L&D and Generative AI – a view from the bullet train!
Laura Overton
Continually curious about learning innovation and business impact |Founder Learning Changemakers |Co-creator of Emerging Stronger
I’ve always been interested in the ways that technology can improve the ways adults learn at work. My first job after graduating with a very basic BSc in maths and psychology, I entered work as a secretary to a training manager at Lloyds Register of Shipping. Established back in 1760, this noble organisation established its global reputation by creating safety for seafarers. Rooted in history, they also showed me that their future would be determined by a progressive attitude to sharing actionable intelligence.
First love
It was in this first job that I became intrigued by the giant interactive video disc systems in the learning centre under the stairs. Staff hid away in that quiet office to spend time working through the digital course The Versatile Organisation. The whole programme and platform captured my na?ve newly minted psychologist brain.
Surely, I thought, this hidden treasure taps into the way that adults really learn – personalised pathways, clear guidance, safe practice, feedback, and lots of opportunity to embed into work. I was hooked and from the late 80’s onwards I’ve had a fascination for the way that learning technologies might influence learning innovation and business impact …. If we let them!
Changing digital landscapes
As an industry, we have seen decades of new technologies arrive, all heralding the potential to transform the way we democratise learning opportunities and improve performance. In my personal experience, I have seen CD and network technologies offer improved access to content in the early 90’s, the internet promising responsiveness and personalisation, mobile technologies offering hope for just in time learning, followed swiftly by the arrival of social media and virtual/augmented reality to enhance connection, collaboration, and practice.
As L&D we’ve been trundling through the digital landscape at a steady pace, capturing the view, imagining a potential future, exploring, investigating and, for some, watching the world go by.
The view from the bullet train
But in the last 18 months, we’ve switched tracks. On board of the Generative AI bullet train, the view has been changing every few moments with new models and releases. Out of the window we’ve seen potential opportunities and threats for the world of work, the security of workers and the future of L&D literally flash by. It’s been hard to catch a breath.
Like many, I’ve been watching and learning from those who’ve been enjoying the journey. The work of Ethan Mollick and Prof. Gila Kurtz (Ph.D.) provide really insightful ideas from the world of academia (boy, do we share more challenges with our academic friends than we like to admit!). Generous practitioner such as Detlef Hold , Geraldine Voost and Ross Stevenson have shared their stories and experiences. The research from the likes of Dr Philippa Hardman , Donald H Taylor and Egle Vinauskaite has kept us informed. The writing of Julian Stodd et all, Donald Clark and Sal Khan kept me on my toes as we take the opportunity to explore the creative opportunities ahead and ?experience the universal tutor accelerating into the frame.[1]
But I have held back from adding my personal opinions to the fray for a number of reasons:
领英推荐
A fresh view
Last year I had the privilege of analysing the data and authoring the CIPD ’s Learning at Work report. Of course we asked about Gen AI! But the figures quoted had to be in context - they were gathered in February last year! What stood out to me is that the broad range technology users who were more comfortable with experimenting and applying learning science to their decisions were already making progress!
So, when my friends at the CIPD asked me to write about how L&D can leverage technology for organisational advantage, I realised that there are still plenty of lessons to be learned as we speed through the technology landscape.
I’m not going to steal my own thunder by repeating my initial observations here – you can take a deeper dive in the actual article.
But I am interested in how you feel about our journey with Generative AI so far:
Writing my latest article helped me slow down to catch up – perhaps taking me back to the ocean travel of my first career. A big thank you to CIPD for inviting me to share my thoughts and a big thank you to you for sharing yours below!
Finally... thank you for the global interest in Learning Changemakers. I might not publish a newsletter as often as LinkedIn would like, but I post when I am passionate about an opportunity for us to make a difference so... if you like what you read here, please subscribe and share with others! ??
[1] Footnote – these are some of the amazing bods I have tagged but love to know who is making sense of AI for you – do share! ??
Thanks for your always pertinent insights, as we have seen repedidly if there are no intention to learn and making time and effort for it, there won't be any changes however cheap and accessible the technology is.
Director of Learning, Communications and Knowledge Management for the Office of the General Counsel at Open Society Foundations
6 个月My interest at the moment is solely focused on how AI/GenAI is actually making an impact in the world of legal technology. As I said to one of my learning providers the other week, when I can’t tell that some content wasn’t actually produced by your best learning designer or developer then we can talk about AI. But so far, the rush to claim a slice of the AI for learning pie is just producing a load of solutions that cheapen the end product in terms of the quality. Let’s not forget the “art of training” in the rush to advance the “science of learning”.
Learning, Organisational Development, Facilitation, Team & Leadership Development, Coaching, Culture, Team & Leadership Effectiveness, Inclusion & Diversity, Change
6 个月My observation is that L&D professionals are very quick to jump on the bandwagon and be enamoured by tech because it's "new and shinny" rather than consider how it can add value, ie. drive individual and organisational performance. Most of the time it can actually get on the way for a multitude of reasons - the organisational culture is not ready, the systems and processes aren't in place, there isn't a learning culture, individuals are reluctant to embrace change and new ways of working, etc. Over the past 20 years I've seen fads, tools, tech come and ago. Some good, some great, some bad. I'm not against new Tech and AI - quite the opposite - I love it! It's all about understanding the context and how to apply it in each organisational context in a way that adds value, drives efficiencies, productivity and individual/organisational performance, keeping in mind that it won't always work. What I'm critical of in our profession is this Silver Bullet /chasing the new/shinny mentality. If you still think/believe there are silver bullets (think again!), I strongly recommend you read Steve Hearsum's book. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Silver-Bullet-Solutions-Psychology-Management/dp/1738553809 Be prepared to be challenged (I have!).
Combining Org Development and Design Thinking to develop skills based organisations | Evidence Based | Bus and Exec Coach
6 个月This is timely. I have attended an eye opening session this morning with David at Oxford Review. What it left me thinking is the lack of psychology and science being discussed in L&D (an evidence based lense…although this is sadly nothing new) AND the risks to human critical thinking, problem solving and trust in information (which is subssequently knowledge). The findings from the research presented this morning have impacts for teams, individual and organisations across several dimensions when using Ai. When I have reflected I will write a post to summarise.
Writer, broadcaster and conference speaker on matters relating to corporate learning and development Head of Learning Innovation, Huthwaite International.
6 个月The wonders of the Phillips Laser Disc brought back memories - I first worked on creating one of these in 1986 and few technologies since have been able to replicate its immersive levels of engagement and ability to safely practice different scenarios. Since, most learning technologies have been a solution in search of a problem. With Generative AI, we should expect that initial experiments will be based on doing more of what we do now, more quickly. Unfortunately, you are right that that involves creating yet more content, now with added avatar presented video. I can only hope that as folks get their heads around what Generative AI can do, it will stimulate more creative and innovative applications. Until then we are held back not by the power of the technology but by the power of our imaginations.