Last Minutes of Elections in USA

As the clock ticks down, the world awaits the outcome of a U.S. presidential election that has captivated audiences both at home and abroad. In just a few hours, we’ll know whether Donald Trump or Kamala Harris will take the helm for the next four years—a decision that will ripple across the globe, impacting everything from trade policies to climate agreements and diplomatic relations. The United States is deeply divided, with the political landscape reflecting polarized ideologies. Trump’s camp champions nationalism and economic protectionism, while Harris brings a vision of progressive reforms, inclusive economic policies, and a recommitment to international alliances. Each candidate offers a starkly different approach to America’s role on the world stage, particularly concerning relations with China, Russia, and the European Union.

For those following this historic event, the stakes are clear. The election is more than a decision between two leaders; it’s a choice that could redefine the U.S.’s position as a global superpower, impacting economic stability and security worldwide. The candidates’ policies on critical issues such as climate change, digital privacy, and international trade could either lead the way to new alliances or further deepen global divides. The anticipation in these final hours is palpable. Observers across every continent are ready for the announcement, knowing that whoever is declared president will shape not only the future of American democracy but also the future of global politics. Soon, we’ll all find out what’s next for the United States—and what lies ahead for a world watching closely.

The American political landscape is often hailed as a model of democracy. However, upon deeper scrutiny, it reveals a complex, multi-layered structure shaped by powerful elites. This model is sometimes referred to as a "plutocracy," where wealth, rather than popular will, wields substantial influence. As we approach the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, it is crucial to explore how plutocratic structures continue to shape American governance and influence global politics.

A Brief Historical Background

The founding fathers of the United States were not military leaders akin to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk but were wealthy merchants and landowners. Their wealth allowed them to resist British policies and assert autonomy in economic and political matters, leading to the American Revolution. From the Boston Tea Party in 1773 to the signing of the Constitution in 1787, the trajectory of American independence was paved by those with substantial financial means. George Washington, one of the wealthiest presidents in U.S. history, and his contemporaries established a system to protect their wealth and interests. The foundations of the U.S. Constitution, according to James Madison, were designed to protect the interests of the elite minority. Thus, the early American governance model was shaped around preserving wealth and securing trade interests, a pattern that persists in modern times.

The Deep State: Reality or Conspiracy?

The term "deep state" is often dismissed as a conspiracy, especially within American discourse. However, structures like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and powerful networks on Wall Street embody a less visible layer of influence over U.S. policies. These groups operate beyond electoral outcomes, holding sway over economic and foreign policy decisions. Their influence becomes evident as they support candidates who are aligned with their agendas and, consequently, maintain the status quo of American global dominance.

The Role of Corporate Interests in Elections

The American election system is heavily influenced by wealth, with campaign financing being a major factor in candidates' success. Media coverage and communication networks are primarily controlled by elite groups, giving well-funded candidates a distinct advantage. As a result, candidates must align with major party platforms and secure substantial financial backing to compete. The influence of "big money" not only shapes the platforms of candidates but also perpetuates a cycle of power where wealth begets more wealth and influence.

2024 Elections: A Battle of Ideologies?

In the 2024 election, we witness a stark contrast between candidates with varying approaches to national and international issues. Former President Donald Trump, representing a brand of economic nationalism, appeals to a base of working-class and conservative voters. In contrast, Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate, is perceived as a pragmatic moderate with a progressive approach to social issues. While Trump’s policies favor protectionism and tax reforms that benefit the wealthy, Harris’s platform includes tax reforms aimed at redistributing wealth more equitably. However, both candidates, regardless of their ideological differences, remain tethered to a system that requires allegiance to the interests of elite backers. Thus, whether it’s Trump or Harris in office, the underlying structures of American plutocracy are unlikely to change.

Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy

The interests of multinational corporations and elite lobbying groups inherently influence American foreign policy. The U.S. military-industrial complex plays a pivotal role in shaping foreign relations, particularly in regions of strategic interest such as the Middle East and Asia-Pacific. Trump’s alignment with the oil and defense industries has shaped his foreign policy decisions, notably with respect to Israel and the Gulf states. Conversely, Harris has focused on reinforcing alliances with NATO and upholding liberal democratic values, particularly in relation to China and Russia.

The Global Influence of American Plutocracy

The influence of American plutocracy is not confined to its borders; it extends globally through economic, cultural, and military means. The U.S. dollar, as the world’s primary reserve currency, allows the American elite to exert considerable control over global markets. Furthermore, American corporations, from technology to finance, operate in virtually every country, spreading influence and advancing U.S. interests. The global implications of American plutocracy are particularly felt in developing nations, where American companies exert economic power, often at the expense of local industries and labor markets. This form of neo-colonialism has fueled anti-American sentiment in many parts of the world, complicating diplomatic relations.

The Path Forward: Reforms or Revolution?

For the United States to achieve a truly representative democracy, structural reforms are imperative. Campaign finance reform, transparency in lobbying, and restrictions on corporate influence in elections are essential steps. However, such reforms face significant resistance from those in power, making change unlikely in the near future. Globally, the influence of American plutocracy calls for a rethinking of international governance structures. A more multipolar world order, where nations like China and the EU exert greater influence, could potentially check the dominance of American plutocracy and promote a fairer global system. The transition toward this new world order, however, is fraught with geopolitical tensions and economic competition.

The 2024 election is a critical moment for American democracy, as it exposes the ongoing influence of wealth and power in shaping national policies. While the candidates present contrasting visions, the underlying structure of American plutocracy remains largely intact. For the United States and the world, meaningful change will require a fundamental shift in how political and economic power is distributed—a shift that may be long in the making but is ultimately necessary for a more just and equitable global order.