Landlord's consent to alter

Landlord's consent to alter

In the case of Jacobs v Chalcot Crescent (Management Company) Limited, the High Court considered an appeal by a residential long leaseholder regarding his landlord's refusal to grant consent for alterations.

The tenant initially sought consent, leading to a 6-month exchange of correspondence between the parties' surveyors without resolution. Subsequently, frustrated by the delays, the tenant proceeded with the alterations.

Eleven months post-initial request, the landlord formally denied consent, citing fire safety concerns. Surprisingly, during legal proceedings initiated by the tenant for a declaration that consent had been unreasonably withheld, the landlord shifted their argument to focus on potential risks to structural integrity.

The High Court ruled in favour of the tenant's appeal due to inadequacies in the landlord's argument. ?They can’t come to trial and argue a risk to structural integrity but not include that submission in their defence.?

If the landlord had presented their case more effectively, the court stated:

1. They could have demonstrated that the delay in decision-making was not fatal to their cause, as they had engaged with the tenant in good faith throughout the process.

2. However, withholding consent based on concerns about structural integrity required supporting evidence from experts of which they had none.

3. Additionally, it would have been more reasonable for the landlord to propose alternative solutions that did not jeopardise the building's structural integrity.

The court appears to afford a significant degree of flexibility concerning timeframes compared to, say, a request for consent to assign.? That is, provided the facts warrant such extended deliberation.

Landlords are advised to refrain from introducing entirely new grounds for refusal without prior consideration and secure evidence from somebody with the necessary expertise if they are basing their decision on something outside their skill set. ?

Moreover, courts favour conditional refusals that prioritise protecting genuine interests over outright rejection. ?Opting for a compromise plan can often yield mutually agreeable outcomes and the court will expect to see parties working together to that aim.

If you have any legal inquiries or discussions on similar matters, feel free to reach out to me at [email protected] or 07816 755 372.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Luke Weldon LLM的更多文章

  • High rise cladding

    High rise cladding

    In the context of the highly charged and topical issue of cladding of high-rise properties and in the case of Octagon…

  • Mind the Registration Gap

    Mind the Registration Gap

    Yesterday, Cooke J delivered her judgement on R M Residential Ltd (RM) v Westcare Estates Ltd. & Another, a decision…

    1 条评论
  • Modifying restrictive covenants revisted

    Modifying restrictive covenants revisted

    Those who read my article on 17 November 2023 will know my view on the Upper Tribunal’s decision on Kay v Cunningham…

  • Going to court is rubbish

    Going to court is rubbish

    Last month’s well-publicised neighbour dispute between a couple and a farmer highlights the folly that sits at the…

    1 条评论
  • Your home is your castle, but will EPC requirements bring down the battlements

    Your home is your castle, but will EPC requirements bring down the battlements

    “Adapting Historic Homes for Energy Efficiency: A Review of the Barriers” was published by the Government as a combined…

  • Parking and development rights

    Parking and development rights

    On Friday, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Duchess of Bedford House RTM Company Ltd & Ors v Campden Hill…

    1 条评论
  • Newcomer injunctions.

    Newcomer injunctions.

    On an issue of granting "newcomer injunctions” the Supreme Court today delivered its judgement in Wolverhampton City…

    3 条评论
  • Kay v Cunningham on modifying restrictive covenants.

    Kay v Cunningham on modifying restrictive covenants.

    The case concerned a Grade II listed dwelling known as Lea Hurst which was the home of Florence Nightingale. Occupation…

  • Court rules on disrepair in commercial leases

    Court rules on disrepair in commercial leases

    The Court of Appeal in Gill v Lees News Ltd has provided further direction on the “fault” grounds under the Landlord…

  • Telecoms Code - Interim rent and ADR are coming...

    Telecoms Code - Interim rent and ADR are coming...

    Last year there came the trips-off-the-tongue Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022 (PSTIA)…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了