Labour’s muddle over “working people” and the self-employed
IPSE - The Self-Employment Association
Where self-employment works for you.
By Joshua Toovey , Senior Research and Policy Officer at IPSE - The Self-Employment Association
Labour promised at the general election not to increase taxes on working people – but the party failed to explicitly define who they are.
The weekend’s political shows finally saw this lack of clarity come to a head. The vague and often contradictory responses of Cabinet minsters arguably left us with more questions than answers.
While the Prime Minister referred to the UK’s working people as anyone who earns a living via a payslip and unable to “write a cheque to get out of difficulties,” Education Secretary, Bridget Phillipson couldn’t confirm if business owners would be considered working people.
Similarly, when asked directly if the self-employed fit this definition, Pat McFadden refused to speculate on the contents of the budget – only further fuelling speculation. And just this morning, Wes Streeting referred to working people as anyone who struggles to get by.
Is it the case they mean anyone struggling to make a living? In that case, self-employed individuals earning under a certain threshold would certainly meet this.
Or is it simply those that solely receive their income from PAYE? In any case, Labour have certainly made a rod for their own back by being so unclear in their manifesto.
Do Labour see the self-employed as working people?
The answer to this question likely starts with Labour’s union roots. The party has, for the most part, considered self-employment as insecure work with few protections from what they see as exploitative practices and a lack of collective bargaining. Indeed, there are parts of the gig economy that most certainly fit this view and some protections here may well be required.
But this overlooks the real story of what is a hugely diverse and dynamic sector of workers. Not only do they add an estimated £331 billion in value to the UK’s economy in a single year, but their societal impact – their unique role in local and business communities – is something that employees are overwhelming alive to. ?
Many of these self-employed businesses are at the heart of projects that deliver cutting-edge advancements in science and technology or provide crucial support for the functioning of national infrastructure and government; but we are yet to see a Labour minister make clear that they truly grasp and appreciate this.
The fading attraction of incorporation
How you pay yourself also appears to be a determining factor for whether the manifesto pledge applies to you, with Keir Starmer all but confirming this.
This is especially notable given the gradual erosion of any benefits that come with running an incorporated business in the UK. Successive Conservative governments made it harder to be in business by yourself; implementing the IR35 reforms, reducing the dividend allowance, freezing tax thresholds and increasing corporation tax.
For many owners, this proved to be too much, forcing viable businesses to the wall at a time when we should’ve been encouraging entrepreneurship.
领英推荐
If Labour is serious about its growth agenda, it must embrace the UK’s smallest businesses – and fast. Instead of rowing back on manifesto pledges, the focus must be on encouraging these businesses to thrive.
Economic inactivity must also be a priority for the Chancellor. Enticing the thousands of company directors that have left the labour market due to IR35 to return is fundamental if the UK is to fulfil its economic potential.
Unfortunately, if speculation proves to be correct, it could be another bitter pill to swallow for the UK’s 4.3 million self-employed.
Any hike to Employers’ NI a hit to umbrella workers
If speculation is to be believed, the Chancellor is set to raise Employers’ National Insurance contributions at today's Budget statement.
Some 700,000 umbrella company workers will likely have to cover this cost through a reduction in their take home pay, despite being reassured that their taxes would not be raised in the election campaign.
These individuals, many of whom have been effectively forced into operating through an umbrella company due to IR35, will feel particularly aggrieved that the cost of IR35 is about to increase again.
Join us on Thursday for our analysis of the Budget
Join IPSE’s policy team on Thursday for our reaction to the Budget and insight into how any new measures could impact you, your business, and the wider self-employed sector.
For more information on this year's budget, join our Policy team tomorrow for an in-depth analysis of Labour's first Budget and its impact on the #SelfEmployed! ??? Thursday 31st October ? 12:30 - 13:30 PM ?? Zoom webinar ?? Free for IPSE members and £15 plus VAT for non-members From changes in Capital Gains Tax to travel costs and IR35, get the insights you need to plan ahead. Sign up below: https://www.ipse.co.uk/events/labours-first-budget-how-does-it-impact-you-and-your-business
As part of the team who ran the ForgottenLtd campaign over the pandemic I had the opportunity to talk to many politicians of all parties. If I can help the discussion along I can share that a Zoom with a current member of the Cabinet delivered the response - “our problem is that none of you lot are going to join a union any time soon”. Read into that what you will when it comes to small business owners.
Python projects for Embedded Systems and IoT
4 周I am not sure the "employers NI" change will impact umbrella company employees in the way expected. First: The "rights on day one" changes will impact the responsibilities of umbrella companies to their employees. Until now, the umbrella companies have escaped that burden associated with true employers. That lead to the second point: An employer cannot legally reduce the salary of an employee without consent. Umbrellas can get away with it because their employees currently do not have protection on day one. What other legal loopholes could be closed or changes made that impact the viability of umbrellas?