KS02021/001: How to filter different fields with the same name in the same packet from Wireshark?
Source: Google

KS02021/001: How to filter different fields with the same name in the same packet from Wireshark?

Everybody who already worked with Diameter protocol, specifically with DCCA application (Gy interface) knows that it's difficult to filter errors based on Result-Code at MSCC level and at same time excluding the Result-Code at Command level.

No alt text provided for this image

They have the same name (result-code), the first one at command level specifies the result of the transaction between client and server and the others (we can have 1 to x different active services) specifies the result of the service request for one specific session (subscriber).

Since from wireshark we don't have a way to filter them differentialy (*Diameter.Result-Code* for cmd and mscc level), I found a way to do it based on frame and their interval-bytes as you can see in the image below.

No alt text provided for this image

Note: you can combine this sintaxe with application-id avp in order to guarantee that you are filtering only Gy traffic (excluding Gx or other diameter traffic in the pcap like DWR/A, etc).

This was my first technical article and my english isn't my native language, so sorry for that. Any contribution to improve the article will be welcome.

#telco #telecom #mobilenetwork #diameter #knowledgesharing #gyinterface #wireshark #wiresharkfilters #onlinecharging #pcef

Adilson Figueira

5GC Engineer, Cloud Packet Core Solution Architect, EPC Core Network Engineer, CCNA, ITILV4...

3 年

Well done Erivelto!

Great initiative Erivelto A., congratulations on the article. That knowledge is really useful to debug network-related issues. I use Grammarly (https://www.grammarly.com/) to help with writing and grammar, so I think it can help you too. Cheers, and I wish you all the best!

José Ulombe

IT Technician at Unitel, SA | Front-End Development | HTML5 | CSS3 | Python | Docker| CICD| Git |

3 年

Congrats bro.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了