Knowledge capture and retention in FEA
Illustration (c) Steve Abbey 2017

Knowledge capture and retention in FEA

Knowledge and experience can leak out of a company’s collective “soul”

Many companies are concerned with retaining the knowledge and experience that analysts possess and which is inherent in both their day-to-day and long-term tasks. This is not a new phenomenon – I remember very similar worries when I joined the aircraft industry 40 years ago. The concern then was associated with the transition from traditional manual stressing techniques to the new-fangled FEA methodologies!

Read more in my Digital Engineering August article.

click here for article

regards,

Tony


Bernt Isaksen

Managing Director and Numerical Analysis Specialist at Dynova

7 年

After spending close to 35 years with Finite Element Methods, I tend to agree. If you do not know what answers to expect from your FEA system, the results can be ruining your design. We present short courses in Structural dynamics, to let the designer understand what he or she is doing before diving into FEA. The courses will let the participants understand that there is no big fuzz about understanding the dynamics theory. But how do you apply that knowledge in your design, that is often the biggest challenge?

回复
James A.

Senior Structures Engineer at BAE Systems Australia

7 年

Fantastic article Tony Abbey. This is a real challenge for all companies and as an individual I have tried to capture my knowledge and experience in the form of engineering tools that my junior engineers utilise for their day to day work. The knowledge is captured in engineering reports that both serve as a user guide and contain the theory so that it can be easily validated and verified. My utopian ideal is to have an engineering toolbox available for all our engineers. It takes time to do and a balance on delivering services versus investing the time to secure the knowledge can be tenuous at best. It generally happens by osmosis rather than a deliberate defined strategy.

回复
narasingha satapathy

Senior Consultant aircraft/helicopter/engine design

7 年

Manual stressing tech is far better than FEA most of the time.This is my observation after completing 44 years in design,manufacture,certification,ground and flight testing of aircraft and helicopters.After all Boeing 747 was made in 1962 with hand calculation.No FEA.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tony Abbey FRAeS的更多文章

  • AD Nastran In-CAD walk-through

    AD Nastran In-CAD walk-through

    Hi Everyone, here is a link to my article in DE Magazine, just published, which reviews #Autodesk #Nastran #InCAD…

    2 条评论
  • solidThinking Inspire Review and Tutorials

    solidThinking Inspire Review and Tutorials

    This is the second in a new series of review articles, published in Digital Engineering magazine, looking at Finite…

    16 条评论
  • Part 2: FEMAP with NX Nastran - review and tutorials with videos

    Part 2: FEMAP with NX Nastran - review and tutorials with videos

    This month’s article completes my review of FEMAP with NX Nastran for Digital Engineering Magazine. Check out Part 2 of…

  • FEMAP with NX Nastran - review and tutorials

    FEMAP with NX Nastran - review and tutorials

    This is the first in a new series of my independent overviews published in Digital Engineering Magazine that looks at…

    6 条评论
  • Two new Solidworks Simulation on-line courses

    Two new Solidworks Simulation on-line courses

    I am happy to announce two Solidworks Simulation courses are available on-line at Lynda.com/LinkedIn Learning.

  • Why attend technical conferences?

    Why attend technical conferences?

    My short article in Digital Engineering magazine looks at the motivations for attending conferences. It's worth a read…

    2 条评论
  • Topology Optimization (Part 1)

    Topology Optimization (Part 1)

    In Part 1 of this series of articles I dive a little deeper into the background of Topology Optimization and attempt to…

    16 条评论
  • Topology Optimization (Part 2)

    Topology Optimization (Part 2)

    In Part 1 in this series, we looked at the SIMP method of topology optimization in some detail. In this article, I look…

    1 条评论
  • Topology Optimization (Part 3)

    Topology Optimization (Part 3)

    Latest Article in DE magazine by Tony Abbey In the previous articles in this series, we looked at the various Topology…

    2 条评论
  • Don’t Stress Over Simulation: Tips for using finite element analysis to better understand stress

    Don’t Stress Over Simulation: Tips for using finite element analysis to better understand stress

    I’m delighted to be able to introduce this set of articles taken from the series published in Digital Engineering over…

    14 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了