Know your enemy
Jonas Hanway, looking suitably haughty

Know your enemy

A couple of days ago I came across a great anecdote. It concerned the skirmish that broke out in the early 1750s between an Englishman called Jonas Hanway, and the hansom cab drivers of London.

Hanway’s crime was being the first umbrella user in the city. Prior to that point umbrellas had only existed in the form of sun parasols, originating in the far east and gradually spreading across Europe. It was only in the early 18th century that the French had cottoned on to their potential as a rain deterrent, and it was following a trip to Paris than Hanway brought the new innovation to English shores.

There were a number of reasons that umbrellas were initially an object of scorn — not least their association with the dastardly French — but their main crime turned out to be the threat they posed to the business of cab drivers.

It doesn’t take much thought to figure out why. Rainy days were the cornerstone of the cabbie’s trade (especially in London), and so naturally they were concerned when a new method of rain protection hit the market.

Thus, as Hanway strutted around town with his new contraption, he was not only subjected to jibes about being a “mincing Frenchman”; he was also pelted with rubbish from cab drivers. One even tried to run him down, resulting in Hanway using his umbrella to “give the man a good thrashing”.

Aside from finding this quite amusing, the reason I want to share it here is because I think it serves as a good illustration of true competitive dynamics.

Most businesses routinely fail to see their competitors as anything other than “things that look like them”, which results in them completely missing all sorts of threats, as well as growth potential. The true definition of your competitor is anything that results in you losing a sale.

  • Chocolate bars and fruit are competitors
  • Boats and home extensions are competitors
  • Bars and TV are competitors
  • Porn and sex are competitors
  • Religion and politics are competitors

If it has the potential to scratch the same itch, then it’s a competitor.

What this means of course, is that most businesses have far more competitors than they realise. At first this sounds a little alarming, because more competition means more threat. But then at the same time it also means more opportunities, since the places your business goes are also the places it can come from.

Now my sense is that most people understand this point, at least intellectually. I expect you will have heard variations of it before, maybe even from me! However although everyone “gets it”, almost nobody bothers to engage with it — which is a problem as its value lies entirely in the specifics, not the abstract theory.

For this reason, it’s a great idea for every business to map out its true competitive landscape: consisting not only of its obvious competitors, but its less obvious ones too.

To do this, I suggest looking at it in three dimensions:

  1. Direct competitors — the obvious ones, the businesses that look like you (e.g. boat brand A versus boat brand B)
  2. Indirect competitors — businesses outside your category which have the potential to scratch the same itch (e.g. boats and home extensions, or boats and cars)
  3. Non business competitors — activities, behaviours, and motivations which may prevent a sale (e.g. boats and not living near the sea)

I have found that strategically strong businesses tend to orient themselves against “competitors” which come from category 2 or category 3, and largely ignore those in category 1.

This is often what I mean when I talk about “companies without competitors”. It’s not that such companies don’t have “rivals for their customers’ attention”. Everything has that. It’s more that they choose to attack rivals which are outside of their superficial category.

Ultimately this is about realising that brands don’t operate in this neat and bounded thing we call a “category”. That’s a fake concept we invented to make things seem more simple than they really are.

In reality brands operate in this messy and unbounded thing we call the real world.

You’ll never be able to map it or master it. But if you try, you can get a rough idea. And that’s a hell of a lot better than nothing.

__

This piece is from my newsletter The Way, which teaches strategic thinking to founders. To sign up, and access my free 7 day course in strategic thinking, just go here: https://mailchi.mp/53e8061f1686/basicarts 

Robbie S.

Director of Product Design at EV.com

3 年

Totally agree. And especially from a design perspective if the focus is only ever Category 1, then the product will always be playing catch-up and never be innovative. I suppose it’s also the difference between following or leading.

Roger Jackson

CEO Shopper Intelligence. Fuel the discussion with facts on how each category 'plays' in a retailer from the shopper perspective. Founder Sensecheck.com - our huge panel of experienced marketers help SMEs succeed.

3 年

"religion and politics" - I'd love to unpack that one!?

回复
Ed Gray

Managing Director at VCG PromoRisk | Promotional Risk Management | Promotional Marketing | Shopper Marketing

3 年

Some really good thinking, Alex. Thanks for posting.

Angus Grundy

strategy?+?story for growing consulting firms

3 年

"If it has the potential to scratch the same itch, then it’s a competitor." Nice, Alex. I agree. Alternatives are everywhere, and not always where we think. It's also remembering that for, say, B2B services, there's always the 'do nothing' option (a favourite of the organizations my clients serve).

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Alex M H Smith的更多文章

  • Strategic confidence: this is everything

    Strategic confidence: this is everything

    It’s not every day that I come across a new idea in this field which stops me in my tracks, but I heard something…

    13 条评论
  • Glossary of strategic ideas - volume 2

    Glossary of strategic ideas - volume 2

    The following, as suggested by the title, is an update to my old post cataloguing various strategic hacks, tricks, and…

    6 条评论
  • The opposites game: how to tell if a strategy is nonsense

    The opposites game: how to tell if a strategy is nonsense

    By my conservative estimate, about 90% of business strategies are, when you get down to it, exactly the same. They use…

    10 条评论
  • What are non-value strategies?

    What are non-value strategies?

    To read my latest essay on the murky world of "non-value strategies", and to subscribe and receive all new posts…

  • Does the military have anything to teach us about strategy?

    Does the military have anything to teach us about strategy?

    I’m going to level with you here, I’ve not actually read Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. I know, I know, what kind of…

    10 条评论
  • Cultural imprinting: how ads really work?

    Cultural imprinting: how ads really work?

    Ever notice how much better it is when your favourite song comes on the radio compared to when you listen to it on…

    2 条评论
  • The disappearance of the original mind

    The disappearance of the original mind

    By the time he was 22, Jack London, author of The Call of the Wildand White Fang, had variously: Worked in a cannery…

    4 条评论
  • Armani, aspiration, and the decline of luxury

    Armani, aspiration, and the decline of luxury

    If we’re reductive about it, we might say there are really only two strategic levers a business can pull from a…

    3 条评论
  • The Challenger Trap: fighting the status quo with the status quo

    The Challenger Trap: fighting the status quo with the status quo

    Once up on a time, to be a “challenger brand” simply meant that you weren’t number one. On this basis pretty much any…

    1 条评论
  • The toilet paper rule

    The toilet paper rule

    We want to be the Apple of dishwasher tablets. We want to be the Nike of accountancy software.

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了