KIV Should Be Beyond Limbo in a Fast-Paced Recruitment World

KIV Should Be Beyond Limbo in a Fast-Paced Recruitment World

In the dynamic realm of recruitment, the “Keep in View” (KIV) option has long served as a middle ground between hiring and rejecting candidates. However, as hiring processes evolve and businesses strive for greater efficiency, it’s time to challenge the notion of KIV and embrace a more decisive approach.

The Traditional KIV Approach

Traditionally, when recruiters encounter a candidate who doesn’t quite meet all the criteria or whose qualifications are promising but not an immediate match, they often opt to KIV them. This practice involves setting aside the candidate’s application for future consideration, keeping the door open for potential opportunities down the line. While KIV may seem like a prudent strategy, it comes with its own set

of drawbacks and inefficiencies

Drawbacks of the KIV Approach

Ambiguity and Candidate Experience

One of the primary criticisms of the KIV approach is its inherent ambiguity. Placing candidates in a state of limbo can leave them hanging, unsure of where they stand in the hiring process. This lack of clarity not only reflects poorly on the employer brand but also diminishes the candidate experience. In today’s competitive job market, where candidate experience can make or break an employer’s reputation, transparency and communication are paramount. Candidates appreciate knowing where they stand, even if the news isn’t favorable.

Prolonged Hiring Process

Moreover, the KIV option can unnecessarily prolong the hiring process. By deferring decisions on candidates, recruiters risk creating bottlenecks in the pipeline, slowing down the entire recruitment cycle. In an era where speed and agility are key drivers of success, organizations cannot afford to squander precious time deliberating over KIV candidates when more decisive actions could propel them forward. A streamlined hiring process not only benefits the organization but also enhances the candidate’s perception of the company.

Perpetuation of Biases

Furthermore, the KIV approach may inadvertently perpetuate biases in hiring. When recruiters default to KIV for candidates who don’t fit neatly into predefined boxes, they miss out on opportunities to challenge their own biases and expand their talent pool. By embracing a binary decision-making model—hire or reject—recruiters are forced to confront their biases head-on and focus on selecting the best candidate for the role based on merit alone. This approach promotes a more inclusive and diverse workforce.

Embracing Decisiveness

So, what’s the alternative to KIV? Embracing decisiveness. Rather than leaving candidates in a state of limbo, recruiters should make clear, informed decisions based on the candidate’s qualifications, skills, and cultural fit. For candidates who don’t quite meet the mark but show potential, recruiters can provide constructive feedback and guidance on how they can improve for future opportunities. This not only helps candidates grow but also leaves a positive impression of the company.

Leveraging Talent Pipelines and Communities

Additionally, recruiters can leverage talent pipelines and talent communities to nurture relationships with promising candidates who may not be the right fit at the moment but could be valuable assets in the future. By maintaining open lines of communication and fostering a sense of belonging, recruiters can keep candidates engaged and interested in future opportunities without resorting to the KIV option. This proactive approach ensures that the organization has a ready pool of talent to tap into when the need arises.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the KIV approach has outlived its usefulness in today’s fast-paced and competitive hiring landscape. By embracing decisiveness, recruiters can streamline the hiring process, enhance the candidate experience, and mitigate biases—all while building stronger talent pipelines for the future. It’s time to bid farewell to KIV and embrace a more proactive and decisive approach to hiring. This shift not only benefits the organization but also fosters a more transparent, efficient, and inclusive recruitment process.



Ahmad Al Cheikh Hassan

TalentNexa



Asmath Basha

Managerial at Chitti promotors

1 个月

Love this

回复
Muhammad Saleem Malik

Finance Manager | SAP | Zakat | VAT | Financial Controller | Project Manager | ERP Implementation | Financial Analyst | IFRS

1 个月

All comments are of value addition

回复

Insightful

回复
????? ???????

???? ?????? ?? Adecco

1 个月

???? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ??? ?????????? ?? ??? ???? ???????? ????? ?? ??? ???????? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ????? ???? ???

回复
Muhammad Suhail

TOP LINKEDIN VOICE EARNED 44-BADGES HAVING 31-YEARS BANKING INDUSTRIES EXPERIENCE ON DIFFERENT ROLE AS HIGHLIGHTED IN MY PROFILE ALONG WITH DIFFERENT IMPORTANT SKILLS DULY ENDORSED BY LINKEDIN HIGH PROFILE MANAGEMENT.

1 个月

Instead of leaving candidates in limbo, companies should actively engage with KIV candidates. Regular updates about the hiring process or company news can keep them interested.Providing clear timelines and next steps can help manage expectations. Candidates appreciate transparency, which can reduce frustration.Offering feedback, even if it’s brief, can help candidates understand their status and improve for future applications.Create a structured talent pool where KIV candidates can be easily accessed for future roles. This allows for a more proactive recruitment approach.Utilizing technology to automate communication can help keep KIV candidates informed without overwhelming recruiters.Tailoring communication based on the candidate’s skills and interests can enhance their experience and keep them engaged. By implementing these strategies, companies can turn KIV into a more dynamic and positive experience, reducing the feeling of limbo for candidates in a fast-paced recruitment environment.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ahmad Al Cheikh Hassan, CIPD的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了