The King is dead. Long live the king.

The King is dead. Long live the king.

I'm sad to see the final nail hammered hand and fist into the King Content coffin by Isentia. By the very same company that bought them a little under 2 years ago, for a lot. I'm sad for the team who are there today, all of them retrenched. There are some great people who I got to work with and learn from.

At it's height, King Content attracted the best talent in the business. The very best. They really were the sharpest tools in the shed and they won clients, did great work and expanded the agency around the world.

So what happened?

I joined King right at the top in 2015, when it was riding high on the content marketing boom in Australia. It was front of market in Australia in designing and championing the content strategy and content marketing methodologies that are now commonplace in every business. It was signing lots of new tier one clients and business was good. It was also for sale and had a number of large suitors circling. Isentia was the corporate shark that won the bidding with $48 million dollars (which became a final price of $38 million after buy-out targets weren't achieved). It was top dollar.

After the purchase we were expecting all sorts of drastic changes as the King Content team was integrated into Isentia. But it was very quiet for 12 months. Too quiet. Of course the machinations were happening in the backrooms as they prepared to bring King Content into the fold. And there lay the opportunity for Isentia in the first place.

The privately owned Media Monitors was more than 40 years old when it rebranded to Isentia in 2012. High barriers to entry meant competition was minimal so business flourished. They very nearly had a monopoly. The digital transformation of the noughties saw the moat that protected the business for so long start to shrink and new competitors and disruption set in. Isentia needed change.

Buying the leading content marketing agency in the region, with it's startup energy and thinking was an obvious way to create opportunity and drive change. Acquired disruption. King had access to new markets and its customers were the marketers, not the communications team that Isentia's sales teams already had wrapped up. In that perfect world, King and Isentia's offerings were in synergy and on paper both businesses would create growth for each other. Bringing the two together would widen the moat, and defend their turf as the likes of Meltwater rolled in their siege machines to steal some of the media monitoring pie. Unfortunately, that's not how it all happened.

The axing of King Content came rapidly. A bumpy integration and two rounds of restructuring before the axe finally fell on the King's neck today. The founders are well and truly paid and happy but the staff that were left have been made redundant and there's some Isentia shareholders that will be asking some hard questions.

I'm a fan of content marketing. Done right it fuels long-term business growth. Done badly and it leaves businesses burning money on pointless activity in social media, aimless blogs and content that is not designed to deliver ROI. Content marketing, or marketing as it should be called, is a powerful tool for both B2B and B2C businesses and we may have seen the death of the King, but content still rules.

Syed Farhan Raza

SEO Lead at Assembly

7 年

The idea of great content will rise to the top is over. Content shock is here. The simple concept of supply demand. When supply exceeds demand, the prices fall but then we are giving the content for free? We actually would have to pay the customer to consume our content as the supply of content explodes, we would have to pay our customer increasing amount to the point it is not feasible. The volume of free content is exploiting ridiculously. No matter what study you read.The amount of available web-based content (the supply) is doubling every 9 - 24 months. Unimaginable, really. The emerging marketing epoch defined when exponentially increasing volumes of content intersect our limited human capacity to consume it. According to Nielsen and other sources, the amount of content we consume on a daily basis has grown from two hours a day in the 1920s to nearly 11 hours per day today. How much higher can this go? 12 hours a day, 13, 15? There is a limit On the supply side of the equation, the amount of information on the web is expected to increase by 500% in next 5 years and it's not going to stop Three things are going to happen and I would write about that in future posts Deep pockets will win The entry to barrier will become impossibly high The cost-benefit flip

回复
蒂莫西

General Manager @ HCF Australia

7 年
Andrew Storrier

Director ?? Digital Strategy ?? Structured Content ?? Communications & Journalism

7 年

Honestly Phil, I think the problem was ping pong. We didn't play enough of it to keep the business moving forward.

Allicia Burke

Collaborating Accessibility, SEO & UX | AuDHD & Neurodivergence advocate

7 年

It's hard, as a person who started in the marketing industry when King Content was starting to make traction and watching it grow, to them seeing it's demise sooooo quickly. They seemed formidable. I really hope that the employees are picked up by some Amazing companies and their careers can continue to bring fantastic content to the user.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了