Key Aspects Related to Alcohol and Drugs in Mining

The mining industry is inherently risky, demanding the utmost attention to safety and health regulations. As part of this commitment, employers face a critical obligation to address substance abuse, which can significantly impair worker performance and jeopardize safety. The Mine Health and Safety Act (MHSA) and the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) establish clear requirements for mine owners to create environments free from health risks, including those posed by alcohol and drugs.

To effectively manage these risks, it is imperative for employers to develop comprehensive substance abuse policies that include zero-tolerance approaches for roles involving heavy machinery and hazardous tasks. Implementing objective testing methods, such as breathalyzer tests and the advanced DAL IdentiKee Pupilometer, provides a reliable means to assess employee fitness for duty and ensure compliance with legal standards.

This article explores the key aspects of alcohol and drug management in mining, including employer obligations, the importance of substance abuse policies, testing compliance, and the legal implications of substance use. By establishing a robust framework for monitoring and addressing substance abuse, employers can enhance workplace safety while respecting the rights of their employees.

Employer Obligations:

• Mine Health and Safety Act (MHSA): Requires mine owners to ensure a safe environment, free from health risks, including those posed by substance abuse.
• Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA): Mandates that employers provide a safe workplace, which includes preventing intoxication that could impair safety.

Substance Abuse Policies:

• Employers should develop comprehensive substance abuse policies that prohibit the presence of intoxicants, including alcohol and drugs, on-site.
• A zero-tolerance policy is essential for roles that involve heavy machinery or hazardous tasks.

Testing and Compliance:

• Breathalyzer Tests

In conjunction with the IdentiKee Pupilometer, employers may implement breathalyzer tests to measure blood alcohol concentration (BAC). These tests must be administered with the employee's consent, ideally established through a written agreement within their employment contract.

• Legal Precedents

Recent court cases underscore the necessity for employers to rely on objective testing methods, such as breathalyzer tests or blood tests, rather than solely on subjective observations. Cases like Ramoitshane v Dixon Batteries (Pty) Ltd and Samancor Chrome Ltd v Willemse and Others highlight the legal implications of failing to use reliable testing methods. Courts have consistently ruled that employers must provide clear evidence of impairment, emphasizing that conclusions drawn from observable behaviors—like bloodshot eyes or slurred speech—are insufficient for justifying disciplinary actions.

Employing the IdentiKee Pupilometer as part of a comprehensive testing strategy reinforces a fair and compliant approach to managing substance use in the workplace, ensuring both safety and respect for employees' rights.

• Pupilometer Screening

The DAL IdentiKee Pupilometer, offered exclusively by DAL Identity International, serves as an essential screening tool for assessing potential impairment in individuals. This advanced technology can detect signs of impairment related to various substances, including alcohol, cannabis, heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine (commonly known as Tik in South Africa), fatigue, potential sickness, or even a possible head injury.

Using the IdentiKee Pupilometer provides employers with a non-biased and legally defensible basis for further testing. The screening process generates verifiable evidence, including:

o??? Individual's Identity: Each test is linked to the person being screened.

o??? Date and Time of Screening: Precise timestamps are recorded.

o??? Place of Screening: The GPS location of the screening is captured.

o??? Pupil Size Measurements: Detailed metrics on pupil dilation or constriction are provided.

This comprehensive data allows employers to validate decisions regarding an employee’s fitness for duty and to determine the necessity for further testing if impairment is suggested. The DAL IdentiKee Pupilometer is the only product that conducts a Fit for Duty screening every time an individual is verified within the DAL IdentiKee system. This means that screenings occur upon entry to the mine, upon exit (which may indicate potential substance use, fatigue, or a head injury), and during access management throughout the mine areas.

Court Cases:

• Enever v. Barloworld Equipment South Africa: Emphasized that a blanket zero-tolerance policy must consider an employee's specific role and job requirements.
• Ramoitshane v. Dixon Batteries (Pty) Ltd [2009]: Demonstrated the necessity of proper testing before dismissal for suspected intoxication.
• Rankeng v. Signature Cosmetics [2020]: Reinforced that positive tests for cannabis without proof of impairment cannot justify dismissal.
• Samancor Chrome Ltd v. Willemse [2023]: Highlighted the unreliability of breathalyzer tests when contradicted by blood test results.
• Moodley and Clover SA (Pty) Ltd: Supported dismissal for cannabis use at work under a zero-tolerance policy.
• Mthembu and NCT Durban Wood Chips: Upheld dismissals for employees who used cannabis off-duty but came to work under its influence.

Employee Responsibilities:

• Employees must maintain a safe work environment and avoid behaviors that may endanger others due to intoxication.

Considerations for Remote Work:

• With the rise of remote work, monitoring substance abuse becomes challenging. Employers should still have clear policies in place regarding the expectations for sobriety, even in remote settings.

Rehabilitation and Support:

• Employers are encouraged to provide support for employees dealing with substance abuse, as mandated by labor laws, especially for recognized conditions like alcoholism.

Impact on Disciplinary Actions:

• Disciplinary measures should be proportional and consider the context of the employee's actions. Rehabilitation may be preferred over immediate dismissal, particularly for ongoing issues related to substance abuse.

Conclusion

Addressing substance abuse in the mining sector is crucial for maintaining a safe and productive work environment. Employers are bound by the Mine Health and Safety Act and the Occupational Health and Safety Act to ensure their workplaces are free from health risks, including those posed by intoxication. Developing comprehensive substance abuse policies, including a zero-tolerance approach for roles involving heavy machinery, is essential.

Implementing objective screening methods, such as the DAL IdentiKee Pupilometer in conjunction with breathalyzer tests, provides a fair and legally defensible strategy for assessing employee fitness for duty. The Pupilometer’s capability to detect potential impairment from various substances offers employers vital, verifiable data that supports informed decisions regarding further testing.

Legal precedents emphasize the necessity of reliable testing methods, reinforcing the importance of not relying solely on subjective observations. Employers must consider individual circumstances and job roles when applying disciplinary actions, advocating for rehabilitation over dismissal where appropriate.

In addition to employer obligations, employees have a shared responsibility to maintain a safe work environment. As remote work becomes more prevalent, clear policies regarding sobriety must remain in place, ensuring safety across all work settings.

By fostering a culture of safety, compliance, and support, employers can effectively manage substance use in the workplace, ultimately safeguarding the health and well-being of all employees while adhering to legal and ethical standards.

DAL Identity Fit for Duty Brochure: DAL-Identity_IdentiKee-Fit-for-Duty-Screening.pdf

Read our White Paper: DAL-Identity_Whitepaper_Fit-for-Duty-Screening.pdf

Contact us: [email protected]?

Visit us: dal-identity.com