Keltie's Digest Vol. 43 March 28th 2022
News
Articles
Implementing a CIS is not an "IT Project" has been a mantra in this industry for almost 20 years. But why is this something that in 2022 there are still projects being run as "IT projects" and then surprised they do not reach the benefits they expected? I plan to dig into the literature on this over the next few weeks and will let you know what I figure out! Some related articles here:
2020: Albert Auditor General reviewed the AHS CIS project. Among the key drivers of success for the AHS Connect Care program we observed to date are:
2017: EY review of Island Health CIS Implementation https://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2017/review-of-Island-Health-IHealth-electronic-health-record-system.pdf
领英推荐
2012: "Perhaps the biggest source of trouble is the failure of executives to identify the right governance structure at the outset of the project. Too often, they automatically see any project involving technology as an IT project. But an EMR implementation is less about technology than it is about transforming your workflows and processes to be more efficient, more patient-centered, and more information-driven." https://ehrintelligence.com/news/why-emr-implementation-as-just-an-it-project-seldom-succeeds
Webinars/Conferences/Podcasts
Interesting Stuff
Thank you for another excellent compilation of interesting reading. I wanted to react on your headline news article about the fatal drug error. I agree with you that this does not sound like a single person failure. Instead, there seems to be an accumulation of issues, some coming out of initial design concepts and testing, some clearly linked to the ongoing evolution of the workplace, and some perhaps unavoidable constraints of the real world, which have led to a perfect storm.