...Keeling_CO2_Yearly_Cycle ... ...Zooming in ...

Zooming in on "scientist?Charles David Keeling?curve" ...

Wat can the summer/winter cycle in this curve point out for CO2_Alarmism and for "Global_Cooling_Denial" ?

In CCR="Climate Change Revival" we do not deny anything about climate change because :

Keeling curve is a scientific measurement curve.

Science is better than the sum of "Believe+Deny" ...

Maybe it is dangerous to say : Science="Believe-Deny" but ...

• Believe=Religion1
• Deny=Religion2
• Science=Science

In the Hawaiian Mauna Loa CO2 Keeling curve we see every year a steep CO2 level uprise from October to end of April and a steep CO2 level downfall from May to September resulting in a 6ppmV=6000ppbV swing on top of the 2ppmV=2000ppbV per year slope of the "scientist?Charles David Keeling?curve" with 1000ppbV=1ppmV ...

You can argue that in Northern Hemisphere winter time we burn more fossil to warm our homes but then :

• Why does this "6000ppbV home warming CO2" disappear to make the yearly cycle go down 6000ppbV in summer ?

And :

• Why "other CO2" makes the 2000ppbV per year slope of the Keeling curve go up every year ?

Before we go in further detail we must realize that already 7000 year in Greenland CO2 level is rising 20000ppbV in 7000 years or almost 3ppbV per year except during the "Little Ice Age" about 500 year ago when CO2 level went a little down in those cold centuries ...

• Little ice age temperature drop made atmospheric CO2 level go down ?
• Atmospheric CO2 level drop made little ice age temperature go down ?

Also 7000 year ago the post glacial sea level rise stopped rising and Greenland seems to be long term cooling since several millennia with every millennium a partial warming intermezzo to continue then for further cooling on the long term ...

• So A 3ppbV per year rising CO2-slope makes Greenland cool down since several millennia now ?
• Probably not but correlation and/or reverse-correlation in time could make us jump to an erroneous conclusion ...

Anyway during the post glacial sea level rise a lot of ice lumps were cooling the Arctic ocean but 7000 year ago the Arctic ice maker/breaker stopped melting the pole ice cap and as the ocean became then less cooled by North Pole ice lumps => Less atmospheric CO2 was absorbed in the North Atlantic Ocean with +3ppbV CO2 level rise in the Greenland atmosphere as a result of less cooling ice lumps ...

In the green curve above we see 5 interglacials for their global atmospheric CO2 behavior on earth : Glacial temperature and atmospheric CO2 go together up and together down but who is the leader and who is the follower ?

• In the previous inter glacial between 110 millennia and 130 millennia ago, we see that temperature (bleu curve) needs to go down to keep the green CO2 behavior stable.
• In our inter glacial since almost 20 millennia now we see that with quasi stable temperature (on the average about 1,5°C cooler now than the peak of the previous inter glacial temperature) we see the same 7000 year 3ppbV global CO2 level rise with quasi-stable temperature after the end of the post glacial sea level rise... global just like in Greenland already 7000 year in reverse-correlation ...

For the global cooling deniers :

Over the past 5 millennia while atmospheric CO2 level is rising, the cold half millennia get colder in the climate cycles ... and colder 4 millennia in a row, alternating with the warm half millennia getting shorter in time and since 1607 until 1991 we had 384 global warming years but since 1991 our global warming cycle is getting less stable after the 1991 cooling glitch ...

But to get back on the topic to zoom in on the Keeling curve :

Coincidently with the yearly summer falling slope of the Keeling curve, the Arctic pole ice cap does the summer melt :

• Is it the summer melt Arctic ice lumps ... cooling the North Atlantic Ocean to start absorbing the 6000ppbV winter CO2 ?
• Is it the winter Arctic ice gain ... warming the North Atlantic Ocean to start blowing the 6000ppbV summer-absorbed CO2 back from ocean to atmosphere ?

• It is very well known in science that melting ice ... cools down the surrounding water like the ice cubes in your drink.`
• It is very well known in science that ice gain ... warms up the surrounding water.

We see the same around the -0,2°C per year cooling Antarctic pole center with +0,8% per decade Antarctic long term ice extent gain and ocean as a result : warming around the Antarctic pole ice cap ...

• The latent heat global warming of H2O ice gain and H2O cloud condensation is confusing climatology in a cooling climate, taking CO2_420ppmV for the guilty party while WaterVapor_H2O_5000ppmV is the major GHG and major global latent heat warming provider in a cooling earth climate ...

• For more details : Probability for a CO2_Molecule to catch a direct solar photon or an earth back radiated photon ... Before an H2O_Water_Vapor Molecule does first ...

But to get back on the topic to zoom in on the Keeling curve :

We still need to find out where the modern black 2000ppbV=2ppmV CO2 per year rising slope comes from because it was only 3ppbV just after the postglacial sea level rise from the pole ice caps melting ...

Although fossil energy CO2-contribution can not be denied, now that we know that ocean can pull every year 6000ppbV=6ppmV in the ocean and blow it back 6 months later from the ocean into the atmosphere, there is the 2000ppbV=2ppmV CO2 black slope per year still on the table now.

The Arctic sea ice extend yearly cycle is going up to 15 million square kilometers at the end of the winter gain and melts down to 5 million square kilometers every summer so :

• 15-5/15=+66% ice gain/melt every Arctic winter/summer with 6ppmV peak to peak CO2_swing in the keeling curve as a result.
• Antarctic long term ice extent gain is +0,8% per decade or 0,08% per year.
• +0,08%/+66%=0,0012=+0,12% of the yearly pole ice swing but we are looking for 2ppmV/6ppmV=33% slope to swing ratio.
• This leaves us with 33%-0,12%=32,88% of the black CO2_slope to explain ...

But we have 5000ppmV WaterVapor=H2O going down 2% compared to 45 year ago ...

• This reduces the probability for a CO2 molecule to bond with an H2O molecule by 2% of the 5000ppmV H2O candidates or 100 CO2 molecules per 5000 CO2 molecules with now 0% probability to make H2CO3=CO2+H2O ...

=>100candidates/5000candidates

=>2% of 420ppmV=>8,4ppmV CO2 molecules not combining to H2CO3 in the atmosphere now every year compared with the probability 45 year ago and we only need to explain 2ppmV per year.

• Is the bonding-probability for a CO2 molecule hitting an H2O molecule less than 2/8,4=24% in earth atmosphere ?

Chemistry is not my major expertise so is there a chemist reading this H2O-hypothesis about the black +2ppmV CO2 slope per year and the 24% bonding probability for CO2+H2O=H2CO3 in the earth atmosphere ?

Or is it just only fossil energy creating the black +2ppmV CO2 per year slope in the Keeling curve ?

Anyway :

PROFESSOR VALENTINA ZHARKOVA BREAKS HER SILENCE AND CONFIRMS “SUPER” GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM

In climate science there are too many unanswered questions and too many unquestioned answers ...

But :

Health & Climate & Energy are realy very complicated and delicate politico-scientific stuff and also socio-economic stuff but we do the best we can and try to explain it as simple as possible but not simpler than that in the group :

CCR="Climate Change Revival