Just how good are the Australians?
Photo by Chirayu Trivedi on Unsplash

Just how good are the Australians?

I never thought I’d be using an article about the Ashes to explain how the Brightpath mathematics assessments help teachers teach to student’s point of need, but it’s fun to give it a go.

And my apologies to my English colleagues, I know this hurts.

In an article in The Australian yesterday, Peter Lalor posed the question:

‘Just how good are Australians?’

Being the nerd I am, I first noticed Lalor had left out the definitive article in his headline, but I guess space didn’t allow him to insert ‘the’. Once I had got over the missing article, I drifted onto his opening paragraph.

‘While there is almost universal acceptance that this has been one of the worst performances by an England side on these shores – and this may be one of the worst teams ever to visit – it is hard to get a bead on how good the Australians are.’

Had I offered Lalor’s article up for discussion at the breakfast table, I suspect my family would have focussed on, and loved discussing, England’s performance. My interest however was on the last sentence: ‘it is hard to get a bead on how good the Australians are.’

My take on why it is hard to know how good the Australian team is (and please bear in mind my only knowledge of cricket is from half listening to the armchair critics on Boxing Day) that we can’t get the measure of the capability of the Australian cricket team because we didn’t see them tested.

This piqued my interest because it’s exactly to same issue we face when students get full marks or nearly full marks in any assessment. Whilst it’s great for student self-confidence, getting all the questions right only tells teachers what students can do. Teachers however need to know what students can’t do. It’s what students can’t do that tells teachers what their students need to learn next.

Take a look at this short video. You will see what I mean. You will see how we use information about what students can’t do to help teachers identify their students’ zone of development. It is this information that helps teachers differentiate their teaching and teach to students’ point of need.

Brightpath formative mathematics assessments

I often lecture in educational assessment. In the course, I have traditionally used a tennis an analogy to explain that we get our best assessment information when we can see where students fall away from tests. It goes like this: if you watched a game a tennis between Novak Djokovic and me, you wouldn’t know how good Djokovic is. Watch a game between Roger Federer and Djokovic, and you know how good they both are. You need to be giving you students assessments that they sometimes get right and sometimes get wrong to determine where they are in their learning.

Perhaps I should update the analogy for my 2022 classes and instead refer to the 2021/2022 Ashes! Let’s see what happens in Sydney.

Hazel H.

Principal, Wickepin Primary School

3 年

Yes Sandy! BP is a great tool to exactly pinpoint next steps for our students whilst directing the explicit teaching points needed next to develop and improve. ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sandra Heldsinger的更多文章

  • Speaking up

    Speaking up

    Should I, or shouldn’t I? Should I, or shouldn’t I? I have procrastinated for a while whether or not to discuss the The…

    13 条评论
  • School goals: insights from business

    School goals: insights from business

    I have just listened to a great HBR Ideacast with Roger Martin about how a business’s drive for efficiency can…

    1 条评论
  • Brightpath singled out by Australian expert panel

    Brightpath singled out by Australian expert panel

    There are not many Edtech start-ups that could hope to be identified as meeting a national need, but that is what has…

    7 条评论
  • Replacing NAPLAN

    Replacing NAPLAN

    ‘Cutting-edge’: the project that could replace NAPLAN. So read the head line to a recent Sydney Morning Herald article.

    13 条评论
  • Will technology provide a breakthrough in educational assessment?

    Will technology provide a breakthrough in educational assessment?

    Standardised testing programs seem to have been around forever. Debate about these programs hasn’t abated.

    2 条评论
  • $309.6 billion set aside for Australian schools

    $309.6 billion set aside for Australian schools

    Plus ?a change, plus c'est la même chose? Our newly appointed Education Minister, Dan Tehan has set out his mission for…

    3 条评论
  • Did you know?

    Did you know?

    National Curriculum levels in England were reported to have had a profoundly negative impact on teaching and learning…

    5 条评论
  • Gonski 2.0: Australia's going back to learning progressions

    Gonski 2.0: Australia's going back to learning progressions

    We have a long, international, and costly history of curriculum change. New curricula are pursued with great gusto…

  • Meeting the Gonski recommendations

    Meeting the Gonski recommendations

    As many of my Australian colleagues will be aware, the Australian Government recently established the Review to Achieve…

  • What is NAPLAN costing us?

    What is NAPLAN costing us?

    In April 2015, Justin Coulson vented his frustration about NAPLAN in the Daily Telegraph, with the headline, ‘Just…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了