?? ???????????? ?????????? ???? ?????????? ??????????????

The western ghats' Brahmagiri hills were lush and fertile lands. It was a place of choice for Sage Guatama and his followers. Sage Gautama lived there with his wife, Ahalya. Sage Gautama was a very smart man, and everyone in the area knew about his wisdom and righteous ways. Once, the region of Brahmagiri was afflicted by a terrible famine. It did not rain for 12 long years. It was very difficult for the sages to live in the region. Gautama was very upset to see the condition of the people living there. He decided to invoke Varuna.

Varuna is a very famous god. Mithra began before the 3rd millennium BCE, when Indo-Iranians and Indo-Aryans, two groups of migrants, started to settle in Iran and Northern India, respectively. So, there are a lot of similarities between the gods of the Vedas and the gods of the early Iranian religion, like Mithra and Mitra. The Vedic Mitra (sometimes given as Mitra-Varuna) was the god of contracts and the sunrise, fertility in the form of rain and good harvests, and keeper of truth. The god of the sunrise, Mitra, got together with the powerful sky god, Varuna. They were thought to live in a golden palace in the sky with a thousand doors, from which they would ride their bright chariot every morning.

He rides on a bright chariot pulled by white horses and brings the rising sun with him. He is armed with a silver spear, a golden bow and arrows, daggers, axes, and a mace, which represents his role as the god who keeps the universe in order and gives kings their right to rule. Mithra is always on guard and can't be fooled. He knows what's in people's hearts and what they really want, and he keeps the forces of darkness at bay. He was considered the most powerful force against the Lord of the Demons, Angra Mainyu (also known as Ahriman), who feared his mace more than any other of the gods' weapons.

Varuna was pleased by Gautama's devotional worship. He blessed Gautama and said,

"I am pleased with you, Gautama, and I shall grant your wish." This well in your ashram will never run dry. "You will never face drought again, Gautama. "

"We are truly grateful to you, my lord."

With the water from the well that Varuna had blessed, Gautama was able to water his ashram and bring it back to its former glory so that there would be enough food for everyone who was going hungry because of the drought. Soon, Gautama decided to give his neighbors some of the food he had so they could also benefit from Varuna's blessings.

The primary sources of energy and a requirement for the operation of such a set of tools on any scale and in any form of human community are critical thinking and an ethical perception of the community environment by the people who live in it. Making sure that everyone involved in a socioeconomic process is at least similarly informed is the primary ethical standard. It's worth a shot once we realize that all we are actually perceiving are changes in our environment. In order to "balance" some of the bad effects of imbalances, our research on ethics will have to focus mostly on information asymmetries. It is important to be aware of this and to actively create or at least help make different artifacts, ideologies, or infofacts. One of the messages contained in the idea that the world is given to us as "information" is that in order for it to be given to us, we must be able to describe it. An important assumption is that we could pretty well figure out what happened if we had a good description of how information circuits work with all the feedback. Despite how difficult this process is, we are fortunate to be able to represent some information about the world in images to the best of our ability using simulation experiments. Evolution has made us able to closely watch and evaluate changes and events in our environment. The necessary complement to what has happened is whatever hasn't happened yet. Understanding our environment involves observing the untapped potential and opportunities there.

Gautama decided to invite all his neighbors.

"Friends, help yourself with as much water as you want." "This well has been blessed by Varuna himself."

The other ashrams were still dry despite receiving water from the well. They were jealous of Gautama's achievements. Instead of taking advantage of what Gautama was sharing, they wanted to ruin everything.

"Why should only Gautama's well be brimming with water and not ours?"

"Yes, you are right. "Why should we trouble ourselves and fetch water from his well?"

On the contrary, Gautama and Ahalya noticed the dryness in their neighbors' regions. They were really upset by it.

" Our neighbors' ashrams are still so dry. "They cannot grow food like this."

"Yes, Ahalya, you are right. "We should share our meals with them." "They must not go hungry."

Gautama called his neighbor to his ashrama.

"Welcome, please don't hesitate; I have cooked enough for everyone."

However, Gautama's kindness did not sit well with the sages.

"Gautama's generosity will make him a favorite of the gods." "We must not let that happen."

"Yes, you are right. "Let us invoke Ganesha."

Ganesha (also known as Ganesh or Ganapati) is one of the most important gods in Hinduism. His elephant head and human body, which stand for the soul (atman) and the physical world (maya), make him easy to spot. He is also the patron of writers, travelers, students, and business. He clears the way for new projects and likes sweets, which is a little bad for his figure. Ganesha is also worshipped as a principal deity in both Jainism and Buddhism. For the Ganapatya Hindu sect, Ganesha is the most important deity. Ganesha is the son of Shiva and Parvati, and he is the brother of Karthikeya (or Subrahmanya), the god of war. He was created by his mother using earth, which she molded into the shape of a boy. As Shiva was away on his meditative wanderings, Parvati set her new son as guard while she bathed. Unexpectedly, Shiva returned home, and, on finding the boy, and outraged at his impudence in claiming he was Parvati's son, Shiva called for his gang of demons, the bhutaganas, who fought ferociously with the boy. But the boy was no match for such scary opponents, and Vishnu had to step in as Maya. While the boy was distracted by her beauty, the demons or Shiva cut off the boy's head. When she heard the noise, Parvati got out of the bath and yelled at Shiva for killing their son so quickly. Shiva felt bad and told everyone to find the boy a new head. The first animal that could be found was an elephant, so Ganesha got a new elephant head and became the most famous Hindu god. As a reward for his great courage in fighting the demons, Shiva made Ganesha the leader of the bhutaganas, hence his name. The story of the god's competition with Karthikeya to be the first to marry explains his association with intelligence and wisdom. They set up a challenge: whoever could first encircle the earth would also find a bride first. Karthikeya quickly got on his blue peacock and took off around the world without wasting a second. Ganesha, on the other hand, just walked over to his parents' house, hugged them, and quoted a line from the sacred Vedas: "He who hugs his parents seven times (pradakshinas) earns the merit of going around the world seven times." Ganesha quickly married not one but two of Prajapati's daughters: Buddhi (which means wisdom) and Siddhi (which means success). He had two sons with them: Kshema and Laabha. Ganesha's broken tusk is that of Krishna, who threw his axe at Ganesha after he blocked his entrance to the private apartments of his parents, Shiva and Parvati. Ganesha allowed the axe to hit and break his tusk so that no one could say that the axe, which was in fact his father's, was not a fearsome weapon. Ganesha broke his tusk in order to write down the epic poem Mahabharata, which was told to him by the sage Vyasa, who wanted to keep the story alive for all time. This explanation isn't as pretty, but it makes sense. This version explains Ganesha's association with writers and intellectuals. Ganesha is shown in Hindu art in different ways depending on the culture (Indian, Cambodian, Javanese, etc.), but he is usually shown with the head of an elephant and the body of a fat person. In his hands, he often carries a broken tusk, an axe, a ladle, a noose, prayer beads, and a tray or bowl of sweets. He sometimes also wields an elephant goad in order to master life's obstacles. Ganesha is often shown riding Kroncha, his big rat, which is known for being quick and shows how the god can get around problems.

Ganesha answered their prayers.

" O Shree Ganesha, please help us out of this drought! "We cannot keep depending on Gautama forever."

Ganesha decided to help the sages. He took the guise of a Brahmin and came to Gautama's ashram. Gautama welcomes him. Gautama washed his feet, seated him on a comfortable seat, and provided him with food and water. Ganesha stayed in. When the time came to leave, Ganesha prayed to his mother, Parvati,

"Mother, please send your attendant Jaya, in the form of a weak and hungry cow, to Gautama's ashram."

In a short while, Gautama noticed the cow, who was weak and hungry but was destroying his crop. The other sages waited outside the fence as their plan slowly unfolded.

Each change can be identified by its bearer (gestor G), how it will be done (modem M), and how likely it is to happen (potential P). We now have 83, or 512, distinct possible changes, which together create a three-dimensional space. "Self-similarity" is an attribute that governs the spatial development model of organizations. Additionally, we can claim that the resulting model has a "fractal" structure. The mathematician Benoit Mandelbrodt came up with the phrase in the latter half of the 20th century. Changes within a certain clause have a specific common form or order, as well as a common purpose or content, and last but not least, a common intention or meaning. We can see the functioning and vanishing regions of the space of variability, or, to put it another way, the phase space of change, emerging naturally or on purpose in the environment. Changes in our environment fall into one of three categories: those that cause or may cause the extinction of our environment domain or clause area; those that may not cause or do not cause the extinction of our environment domain or clause area. The first kind of such change causes stagnation and "freezing," the second kind creates turbulence and chaos, and the third kind results in a situation where the structure is preserved but loses its original meaning. In our environment, we can only monitor and evaluate individual changes from the phase space of possible changes, or, as was said above, from the space of variability. We must draw a line in the sand between what we know and don't know, enclosing our comfortable surroundings. The goal of the first level, which is halfway between the known and unknown environments, is to learn more about the unknown environment. At the same time, it creates some order and lessens the chaos in its surroundings. In this arrangement, a way to get ahead is always to send information to the environment. Our clause is now closed, and we have started to wait for its extinction. The best way to get things back in balance is to add more rectifiers, converters, or accelerators. When information flows between active and passive areas, it helps the organization because it brings the right information into the environment. We can only keep changes in our internal and external environments in a certain zone of dynamic balance with the help of these tools by doing things ourselves. This is a range where these changes will not only help bring about the desired stability of the environment, but also make sure that it will stay around. The secret to success is to look for as many potential future states as you can, rather than creating a clear long-term development vision. By building a family, a network, or an organization with different qualities, one can also get ready for changes that could be very bad. Visions of more distant futures shouldn't be limited by the goal of making as many possible future states. Such a scenario can at least be thought of as a possibility if a link between the next future state and the relevant vision can also be found by looking at how their goals are connected by causes. The dynamics of the team can change depending on how well you understand each team member's needs. No team is made up of people with such clearly defined roles, but each person plays multiple roles within the team. A new perspective is required at all levels of learning processes and interpersonal interaction. "Liquidation changes" are fundamental changes to an organization's environment or content. When these changes add up, one property or characteristic becomes much more important than another. On the other hand, non-liquidating changes don't make as big of a difference in how individual traits look. The third method of assessing how change affects organizations is based on the natural movement that almost all organizations experience. The energy required for communication and conflict resolution must increase. The trend away from tightening the organization to the point where its various parts stop communicating is the problem on the other side. Any increase or decrease in an organization's complexity has a point where it becomes almost impossible to get the organization back to its original stability and viability. There are many signs that this point is getting closer, so it's not hard for observers to pick up on the signs and come up with solutions. The organization cannot be anonymous, either in the here-and-now or in the past. It must leave a transparent and objective record of its deeds in a location that is open to the public. Finding connections between the past and the present is extremely dangerous and frequently deceptive. However, the only strategies that can work are those that link the synchronous and the diachronic. A group's structure, form, content, and meaning must always be in a state of dynamic equilibrium. This means that people must always be looking for alternatives in case the equilibrium is too unstable. An organization's main tasks include keeping track of, documenting, and presenting its own existence. Living things are subjective and aware of themselves, which gives them some sort of personality. The interests, goals, and visions that come from various levels of clauses or domains are the forces behind environmental changes. We'll discuss various approaches to setting goals and devising strategies for achieving them. The third aspect of management and leadership is negotiation. Partnership interest holders have a basic negotiating tool at their disposal. The controlling interests typically become weaker and the controlled interests stronger during negotiations. No one has yet talked about the partners' and their holders' interests and how they are linked. Organizations in the K–8 grades are typically subjective things. If we want to know who is behind these goals, we can't get around the fact that the human brain is where they come from. We can move from questions to answers in the obvious, but we must move backwards from answers to questions in the hidden. The ethics of balance try to fix uneven information about the environment, which makes it less likely that it will be used in a bad way. It is a wager that collaboration and teamwork are more effective than predatory models like "Rat King" or "Czech (suicide) Checkers." Taleb, Nicholas How much of a communication gap between parties can there be during a transaction? The positions of Antipater of Tarsus and the contemporary world appear to be similar. It "can be bought by mistake, but not sold by mistake," claims Taleb. Civil tort laws have consequences and ought to only be used sparingly. We shouldn't purposefully create an environment where a gull could be "plucked" at any time. It should be noted that a sense of justice is based on the suppression of black passengers and parasites. Sharia, and especially the law that governs business and money in Islam, is more interesting to us because it keeps some practices from Babylonia and the Mediterranean that we had forgotten. Sharia imposes a ban on "gharar" that is so severe as to completely bar it from all forms of exchange. If there is enough confusion for both sides, then gharar is gharar. Only God knows the final price, and only God sets it. However, it is against the law to sell a product that is guaranteed to be defective, like a grain merchant on the island of Rhodes. In the Talmud, Rav Safra tells the story of a trader who sells something for 50 coins and receives a 55 coin "improved" price. According to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, such a surcharge constitutes "forcing" goods upon individuals. The availability of all knowledge in the world is no longer an ideal but a reality thanks to the media's digital revolution, which has also changed how we think about knowledge. The question of the day is not whether anyone will be kept from getting information, but how to get through the overgrown jungle of information. As a member of the knowledge society, you should always try to forget what is useless and learn what is new. But, just like the entire "knowledge society," it is a myth. Today, the more knowledge is discussed, the more knowledge about that knowledge is prohibited.

Gautama picked up a few blades of grass and rushed towards the cow. No sooner did the grass touch the cow's body than it collapsed on the floor and died. The sages standing outside witnessed all the events and shouted,

"Gautama has killed an innocent creature! "The sin will fall upon us too."

Slowly, sages began to abandon a sinful ashrama as Gautama begged for forgiveness.

"O learned ones! ""Please tell me how I can wash away my sin."

" You cannot be forgiven." "It is an unpardonable sin."

Saying so, they departed from the ashram. As they departed the ashrama, Sage Gautama looked at the piteous state of the cow and thought to himself,

"How can I revive this cow?"

Just then Ganesha, in the disguise of a Brahmin, appeared before him and said,

"Pray to Lord Shiva to release the holy river Ganges and sprinkle its holy water on this cow to revive it."

Ganesha left, and Gautama realized something strange about the whole incident. He did not kill the cow, and it is not dead, so he decided to take part in this divine ordinance and pray to Lord Shiva, asking to flow the holy waters of the Ganges through the land.

The River Ganges, also known as the Ganga, flows 2,700 km from the Himalayan mountains to the Bay of Bengal in northern India and Bangladesh. Hindus think of the river as holy, and in ancient texts and art, the river is personified as the goddess Ganga. Ritual bathing in the Ganges was and is an important part of Hindu pilgrimage, and the ashes of the cremated are often spread across her waters. In Hindu mythology, the Ganges river was made when Vishnu took two steps to cross the universe as the dwarf brahmin. On the second step, Vishnu's big toe accidentally created a hole in the wall of the universe and, through it, spilled some of the waters of the River Mandakini. Simultaneously, the great mythical king Bhagiratha was concerned when he learned that the Vedic sage Kapila's gaze had burned 60,000 of King Sagara's ancestors. Wanting these ancestors to reach heaven, Bhagiratha asked Kapila how this might be achieved. The answer was to pray to Vishnu sincerely and live as a monk for a thousand years. The great god, gratified by Bhagiratha's piety, agreed for Ganga to descend to earth, where she might wash over the ashes of the 60,000, purify them, and permit them to ascend to heaven. But there was a problem: if Ganga just fell from the sky, her water would do a lot of damage. So Shiva offered to gradually remove the goddess from his hair. He did this very carefully, and it took him 1,000 years. After Ganga landed safely on Earth, Bhagiratha led her all the way across India, where she split into many branches and washed the ashes of Sagara's ancestors in her holy waters. In the Siva Purana, the Ganges carries the seed of Shiva, which, when carried to a clump of reeds, became Skanda. In the Matsya Purana and the story of the Great Flood, the first man, Manu, throws a giant fish into the river, which then continues to grow to gigantic proportions before eventually escaping to the sea. Believers also take water from the Ganges back to their homes to use in ceremonies and as an offering. Drops from the river are also dropped into the mouth before a body is cremated. One of the most sacred sites in India is along the Ganges in Varanasi. Here, in India, one of the oldest cities on Earth, is the Hindu Golden Temple, which is a place of worship for Shiva. The site is also important to Jains and Buddhists, but it is probably best known as a place where people go to retire, be cremated, and spread their ashes on a sacred river.

Gautama and his wife left the ashram and started walking around the Brahmagiri mountain. He told everyone he met about his sins and made lingams to honor Shiva.

A complex character, he may represent goodness and benevolence and serve as the protector. He is also linked to time, especially as the one who makes and breaks everything. In Hinduism, the universe is thought to regenerate in cycles (every 2,160,000,000 years). Shiva destroys the universe at the end of each cycle, which then allows for a new creation. Shiva is also the great ascetic. He stays away from all kinds of pleasure and indulgence and focuses on meditation instead as a way to find perfect happiness. He also has a darker side as the leader of evil spirits and ghosts and as the master of thieves, villains, and beggars. Shiva is the most important Hindu god for the Shaivism sect, the patron of Yogis and Brahmins, and also the protector of the Vedas, the sacred texts. Shiva is closely linked to the Linga (or Lingam), which is a phallus or a sign of fertility or divine energy that can be found in Shiva's temples. Following the death of Sati and before her reincarnation, Shiva was in mourning and went to the Daru forest to live with rishis, or sages. However, the wives of the rishis soon began to take an interest in Shiva. The rishis were jealous of Shiva, so they sent him a big antelope and then a huge tiger. Shiva took care of them quickly and wore the tiger's skin afterward. The sages then cursed Shiva's manhood, which, as a consequence, fell off. When the phallus struck the ground, earthquakes began, and the rishis became afraid and asked for forgiveness. This was given, but Shiva told them to forever after worship the phallus as the symbolic Linga.

Finally, Shiva appears before him, and Gautama asks to be made sinless. Shiva laughs and says that Gautama hasn't committed any sins and that Gautama is such a great sage that even looking at him makes other people sinless. In any case, Gautama asks Shiva for Ganga to be brought there, so that he and others could be purified of their sins. So Shiva gives Gautama "the essence of the earth and heaven," which Gautama's father Brahma gave to him, and Gautama uses that essence to call the goddess Ganga. Shiva tells this to Ganga:

"O goddess, you must stay here alone until the beginning of the Kali Yuga (the fourth and current cosmic age, according to the Vedas), when the son of Vivasvat becomes the twenty-eighth Manu.

Ganga says she'll stay only if Shiva does, so Shiva shows up as Tryambakeshwara, which means "the three-eyed lord." He is one of the twelve Jyotirlingas, which appeared after Shiva showed up as a pillar of light. So Ganga agrees to stay there as a new river, initially called the Gautami River but now known as the Godavari River. Gautama and his disciples bathed there to purify themselves of sin. And even the sages who tried to take revenge on Gautama are eager to get rid of the sins. Ganga is at first reluctant to cleanse these men who were so mean to Gautama, but Gautama persuades her to do it. He then digs a ditch for her to come out of and cleanse the sins of the sages. That ditch is the famous Kushavartha Thirtha at the Tryambakeshwara temple. Gautama sprinkled a few drops of Ganga's water on the cow, and it came back to life. The river came to be known as the Godavari. "Go" means "cow," "Da" means "grant," and "Vari" means "stream."

The tale of the Godavari River gives us a clear picture of what happens when a person sticks firmly to his values, morale, and ethics. Gautama could have chosen not to share his bounty; had he not shared it, there would have been no jealousy, and had there been no jealousy, the sages would not have conspired against him. But Gautama chose otherwise. This is an important incident, and it teaches us a lot of things about the importance of values, ethics, and morale and how to balance them effectively.

In Nietziger's view, restrictions on knowledge are an attempt to foster and reinforce personal illusions and self-deception, which should once more support the mechanisms of authority and affirmation. He wanted to make it clear what the Delphic phrase "Man, know yourself" really meant. Modernism has bigger swings between times when people are humble and times when they focus on their own power. In this transparent environment, which is changing into an all-encompassing information space, a person's image is reduced to a ripple in a sea of data. According to dataism, everything in our environment, universe, or world is made up of data flows, and each component's value for "dataists" depends on how much it contributes to the processing of the whole. According to dataism, the same tools can be used to analyze Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, stock market data, and the flu virus. The two fields of mathematical informatics and biology are the foundations of dataism. The current scientific dogma is fundamentally altering our world. Dataists say that someone who still worships physical beings has a sentimental view of technology. The highest value in the world, according to dataism, is information freedom. Humanity has not developed a new value since 1789. The last time this happened was in the eighteenth century, during the humanist revolution, which pushed for equality, freedom, and brotherhood.

More and more economists view the economy as a data system. In a capitalist system, the seller and the buyer talk to each other and decide on their own what to buy. According to this viewpoint, the stock market is the most potent data processing system ever made by humans. Data processing happens in a free market where processors that are separate but connected make their own decisions. There were four main phases in the building of the human data processing system, each of which focused on a different approach. It makes no sense to increase the number and variety of processors if they are not sufficiently interconnected. We will stop being the highest point of creation if we lose our position on the web. In the text, the living man is supposed to be positioned somewhere between the ideal distant solitaire and sovereign and the man-screw in the machine of a powerful dictator. It is not a route for a particular person or group, but rather a route that each of us may take. "Viability" is about finding important balances in three basic moral dilemmas that have to do with how relationships work. We need to be able to think and learn before we can naturally create information symmetry in our environment. Rewarding behaviors that increase our viability include genuine feelings of pleasure. The first is to find a balance between people's ability to respond synchronously to environmental cues and our ability to learn diachronically, or in the direction of time, from our past experiences. Simply put, mediation is the process by which reality is experienced. Without it, the universe of essences and phenomena would disintegrate and have no way to come together. Instead of a calm balance, the ideal of the ethics of balance can be a passionate but controlled contradiction. Philosophy is not a scientific practice. Since only general philosophical postulates can be put into practice, there must be a wide range of sciences and disciplines that "mediate" between them and practice. People must keep their dignity and give others the time and space they need to slowly come to a decision. Every day, the media literally "rolls" bad news onto each of us, putting external pressure on each of us. Aside from how we feel about the ethics of balance, we have no other way to protect ourselves. The ethic of balance helps the survival of the individual, the community, and maybe even the whole human race. In the past few years, our ideas about what it means to be stable have changed a lot. At first glance, the term seems simple and clear, but this first impression is often wrong because it hides two very different and often incompatible aspects of energy and time. When we talk about stability, we often mean its energy-entropic part, which is very important in the physical sciences. When we talk about thermodynamic stability, we talk about this energy-entropy aspect, so a system with less free energy and more entropy is thought to be more stable than a system with more free energy and less entropy. But stability can also convey a quality of time, namely stamina (persistence). Replication stability (DKS) is a term that describes persistence rather than energy. A population that keeps growing, like a species of bacteria, is only stable in the sense that it stays the same over time. Even though the individual bacteria that make up the bacterial population are constantly changing, the population itself has remained functional and consistent for many millions of years. A fountain metaphor is presented. The fountain itself endures despite the passing of the individual water drops in it. More fundamentally important than energy stability is stability in terms of time (persistence) (entropy). Since the system in equilibrium does not change further, all systems that are stable in the energy sense are also necessarily stable over time (persistence). The opposite, however, is untrue. Systems that are time-stable may not always be energy-stable. As a result, long-term stability is more important. This gives us new ways of looking at how things change in the universe, whether in the biological or physical realms. It lets us come up with the law of tenacity, which is a fundamental law of nature. This logically sound and mathematically supported principle can be stated as follows: In other words, nature seeks persistent forms. The systems change from less stable (persistent) forms to more stable forms. Notably, the formulation is based logically on the axiom that less stable (persistent) systems are inevitably more prone to change. It is essential to understanding what "persistence" means. The same line of thought also suggests that systems that are more resilient are less likely to change. In other words, changing things continue to change until they become unchanged things. Importantly, the principle of persistence holds true in both the "normal" physical world and the replication world, even though the physical and mathematical bases for change are different in each. Probability-based mathematics is relevant for the physical world because the material world changes from a less likely state to a more likely one. This was the basis for Boltzmann's most important contribution to the second law of thermodynamics, which he made more than a hundred years ago. Malthusian mathematics, or the mathematics of exponential growth, is relevant in the replication universe. Based on these numbers, it's clear that the "more efficient" systems are replacing the "less efficient" ones. Even though it is different in the two worlds, the math behind how evolution changes is simple. The best route to longer-lasting material forms is provided by each mathematical discipline. The way things change in the physical universe and in living things is based on a simple logical principle that is close to a tautology. It goes beyond Boltzmann's second law of thermodynamics and Darwin's theory of natural selection, but includes both. Nature seeks stable forms—a fundamental principle that bears repeating. The ethics of balance is a choice we make for ourselves, among many others. Every ethic has consequences that can be either good or bad, just as no ethic is simply right or wrong. Only the idea of free stability is different from the ideas of steady (stable), free (neutral), and unstable (labile) when it comes to the idea of equilibrium. The goal of ethics of balance is to create an environment in which no participant, who is a keeper of their own principles, feels too much risk or insecurity. The so-called "silent trade," which the Phoenicians brought from the coast of West Africa to the European region, is an older method. The level of ethical balance in each person is a necessary condition for a balance to form between different people. When balance ethics are successfully applied to a certain environment, it makes sense that the level and type of balance ethics in the people who enter that environment will change. Evil is what? What source does it have? These are the kinds of issues that drove medieval and modern philosophers insane. Could there have been less crime and bad luck when God created the world? Why is there suffering? Is God more or less rational than other things? The issue that is referred to as a theodicy is a theodicy. God is ineffective if reason is superior. If there is no higher power, there is no connection between wrongdoing and punishment, or between good and evil. This prevailing worldview was at least challenged in 1755, when an earthquake struck Lisbon. Europe was rocked intellectually by the Lisbon earthquake. Since then, we have clearly understood how the concepts of good and evil relate to logic. Modernity was made possible by the rise of reason and all of its good and bad effects. After Auschwitz, evil and logic are separated. The context in which decisions are made becomes increasingly important in the analysis of evil. According to premodern thinking, man's fall into sin is what causes evil. Since Lisbon, evil is no longer studied in terms of religion. Instead, it is looked at as a social phenomenon. Thomas Hobbes, a philosopher, challenges us to imagine a world without laws. Hobbes argues that despite having few resources, we will fight for our unlimited desires. Hobbes' successor, David Hume, who lived a century later, provides the second response. We need a common understanding of what is good and bad because of this. In his book The Dilemmas of Society, philosopher Richard Feynman says that ethical dilemmas are situations that are morally risky. He says that right and wrong are clear in societies where everyone is the same, but decisions are harder to make in societies where everyone is different.

We are in a situation where different values, principles, and goals are at odds with each other. However, because there are various shades of gray, decisions may lean more toward one or the other. Moral choices, according to Jean-Paul Sartre, have to do with how much dirt we let get on our hands. Again, you put them under more stress for reasons unrelated to how well they perform. It would be unjust to the group. And whatever choice you make, you will go against some of those principles. There is no obvious right or wrong in this circumstance. The greater the problem, the greater our responsibility to analyze it. Kant contends that the outcomes should determine whether a choice is good or bad. According to utilitarians, the best choice is the one that benefits the greatest number of people. There are benefits and drawbacks to both strategies, so we are not required to choose one over the other. Making decisions presents us with moral quandaries more frequently. We have three resources at our disposal: utility, universalizability, and our own values. How do we handle the fact that the philosophical ideal does not correspond to our actual contexts for making decisions? In difficult business decisions, it's often a case of right versus right, as opposed to right versus wrong. Managers have to deal with three types of right and wrong issues that make them worry about their moral identity and personal integrity. Surprise and rage were sparked by the company's decision. It was said that the company killed a useful public health tool and was also acting like a coward. It appeared that Dr. Sakiz had defended women's freedom of choice. RU 486's distribution by Roussel-Uclaf raised some questions in the eyes of some observers. Some people questioned whether the government and company had staged the entire episode. Dr. Sakiz was successful in carrying out his own promise to distribute the medication. In front of the Hoechst chairman, he defended his job. Edouard Sakiz's Roussel-Uclaf was dedicated to "the service of life" by using a new, complicated, and risky plan. The business worked to get media attention and then shaped it; it invited its allies to mobilize after shocking them by stopping distribution. It consented to government intervention, which it might have even encouraged or organized.

The story of the river Godavari brings to light the following ethics that every business organization, big and small, should keep in mind: These are the following:

1. Transparency is the cornerstone of a solid customer relationship, which has a direct bearing on a company's success and long-term viability. People are more likely to trust a company the more candor it displays. This is especially true in times of crisis in public relations, where full disclosure is essential to resolving business problems.
2. Businesses that act in a way that upholds equality and fairness can show strength and commendable moral character. Honor and bravery are displayed when a decision is upheld, especially when under pressure to do otherwise.
3. Businesses that uphold their promises and obligations to their partners, customers, and employees demonstrate their dedication to business ethics. People typically prefer to work with and purchase from those they perceive to be dependable and principled, so trustworthiness is a crucial factor in business success.
4. All of a company's relationships, including those with its employees, partners, investors, and customers, fall under the umbrella of "loyalty." Loyalty enables a business to make choices that advance these connections and counteract pressure from external forces with competing interests. This demonstrates that the company prioritizes the growth of the business and its employees over the personal gain of its owners.
5. Leaders should only employ honorable strategies to outperform the competition. Being equal means keeping an open mind and treating everyone fairly, which is related to fairness. This can be applied to hiring procedures, marketing plans, business alliances, and market competition.
6. Genuine kindness, understanding, and concern for others' well-being are displayed by ethical businesses. This refers to achieving business objectives in a way that produces the best results with the least amount of harm. The potential negative effects of a business decision can be lessened by carefully weighing the options and how each one may affect a person or community.
7. Having a fundamental respect for people's rights, privacy, and dignity is a crucial business ethical standard. Businesses that treat all people with respect frequently receive favorable public reviews. Since businesses are held to the ethical standard of maintaining information privacy, respect also relates to client or customer privacy.
8. Following legal requirements and obligations for one's business activities, such as taxes, worker safety, and employment and labor laws, is another aspect of business ethics. Companies that operate legally are seen as more trustworthy and honorable, and they can build a solid reputation as good employers.
9. Companies that uphold ethics are those that work hard to give their clients and customers the best products or services possible. They pursue innovation and creativity, search for the most effective means of delivering their goods, and work to continuously enhance their performance, client satisfaction, and employee morale.
10. Companies with high ethical standards are aware of their obligations to their staff and clients and are cognizant of the impact that leadership behavior has on the organization. Companies have an obligation to take the organization's values and mission into consideration when making decisions so that everyone benefits. Company executives should uphold ethical standards and serve as role models for others by living up to them.
11. An ethical business works to uphold and defend its good name in order to foster an inspiring workplace culture, keep investors interested, and offer exceptional customer service. Leaders must respond appropriately to any attempt to damage a company's reputation using other ethical principles like transparency, accountability, and responsibility.
12. Businesses that operate ethically are those that accept accountability for their deeds and own up to their mistakes in front of all parties that they may have harmed, including shareholders, staff members, and the general public. Along with accepting any consequences, they do so in an open, sincere, and transparent manner.?

#ethics #philosophy #morality #life #love #values #morals #education #integrity #psychology #motivation #vegan #leadership #business #freedom #covid #behavioranalysis #aba #compliance #upsc #inspiration #sustainability #mentalhealth #bcba #ethical #compassion #bhfyp #abatherapy #behavioranalyst #knowledge #values #love #motivation #value #life #goals #inspiration #family #selfcare #vision #happiness #success #morals #community #leadership #purpose #business #respect #mentalhealth #valueyourself #growth #education #ethics #mission #integrity #mindset #quotes #selflove #children #culture #moral #o #love #g #a #tica #quotes #life #n #motivasyon #motivation #etica #indonesia #instagram #filosofia #morality #destek #m #psikoloji #kitap #felsefe #mutluluk #menolaklupa #sagliklibeslenme #y #diyet #inan #art #doktorlar #yks #business #entrepreneur #motivation #marketing #success #money #love #smallbusiness #entrepreneurship #businessowner #mindset #instagram #inspiration #instagood #lifestyle #startup #digitalmarketing #goals #bhfyp #life #branding #investment #design #finance #follow #fashion #work #motivationalquotes #socialmedia #realestate #linkedin