The Jones Act and why the U.S. Needs to Build Its Own Ships:

What is the Jones Act?

The Jones Act (officially called the Merchant Marine Act of 1920) is a U.S. federal law that regulates maritime commerce in U.S. waters and between U.S. ports. Its most prominent provision states that:

• Vessels operating between U.S. ports must be built in the U.S., owned by U.S. citizens, and crewed by U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

The law was originally created to protect and promote the U.S. shipping industry by ensuring the U.S. maintains a strong merchant marine fleet for national security reasons, as well as to support domestic maritime commerce. It was intended to prevent foreign-owned ships from monopolizing U.S. domestic trade, thus preserving American jobs and industry.

Key Provisions:

• U.S.-Flag Requirement: Any ship transporting goods between U.S. ports must be U.S.-flagged, meaning it is registered in the U.S.
• U.S. Ownership: The ship must be owned by U.S. citizens or U.S. corporations that meet specific criteria for ownership.
• Crew Requirements: The crew must be predominantly U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

Is the U.S. Really Enforcing the Jones Act Today?

Yes, the Jones Act is still enforced today, but its impact and enforcement can sometimes be nuanced.

1. U.S. Domestic Shipping: The Act continues to govern domestic shipping, meaning foreign ships are not allowed to operate between U.S. ports. For example, goods transported from California to New York must be shipped on vessels that meet the Jones Act requirements.

However, the U.S. merchant fleet has dwindled significantly over the years, and many vessels that comply with the Act are owned by large companies. This has resulted in higher operating costs for shipping domestically, as there are fewer ships available to provide services, making U.S. shipping more expensive compared to international shipping.

1. National Security Concerns: The Act is still considered important for national security, as a strong domestic shipping industry is seen as crucial during wartime or other crises. For instance, the U.S. military relies on U.S.-owned ships to transport military supplies and troops during conflict, making it critical for the country to have a viable merchant marine fleet.
2. Exemptions and Waivers: There are instances when the Jones Act is temporarily waived, especially in cases of emergencies or disasters, if there are no available U.S.-owned ships to provide needed services. For example: After Hurricane Maria in 2017, the U.S. temporarily waived the Jones Act for Puerto Rico to allow foreign ships to bring much-needed supplies, as there were not enough U.S. ships available. In certain situations, the government may grant waivers to facilitate the transportation of goods, particularly when U.S.-owned vessels are unavailable or when the cost of shipping domestically becomes prohibitive.

When Was the Last Time the Jones Act Was Used?

The Jones Act continues to be actively enforced, and there have been notable instances where its provisions have been put to use:

• Hurricane Maria (2017): The most prominent recent example of the Jones Act being waived was after Hurricane Maria struck Puerto Rico. Due to the devastation caused by the hurricane and the limited availability of U.S.-flagged vessels, the Trump administration temporarily suspended the Jones Act for a short period to allow foreign vessels to deliver supplies to Puerto Rico. This waiver lasted for about 10 days, and was reinstated once sufficient U.S.-flagged vessels were available to handle the transportation.
• Ongoing Enforcement: The U.S. Coast Guard and other maritime agencies regularly enforce the Jones Act. For instance, when foreign ships are found operating between U.S. ports in violation of the Act, the Coast Guard can issue fines and penalties, and vessels can be detained.
• Other Waivers and Exceptions: The Jones Act is also occasionally waived for specific industries like the oil and gas sector, where foreign vessels may be allowed to deliver goods or services due to the unavailability of U.S.-flagged ships. However, such waivers are typically very specific and temporary.

Criticism and Debate:

The Jones Act has been a subject of debate in recent years, particularly regarding its impact on shipping costs and its relevance in the modern global economy:

• Higher Costs: Critics argue that the Act increases shipping costs, which, in turn, raises prices for consumers and hinders economic efficiency. For instance, shipping goods from one U.S. port to another using U.S.-flagged vessels is more expensive than using foreign vessels. This has been particularly problematic for places like Hawaii, Alaska, and Puerto Rico, which rely heavily on imported goods, where the cost of shipping is higher.
• National Security vs. Market Needs: Supporters of the Jones Act argue that it is still necessary for national security reasons, ensuring that the U.S. maintains a fleet of ships that can be used during wartime or emergencies. However, critics question whether the national security justification still holds, given the availability of alternative methods for transporting goods during times of crisis (like airlifting supplies or using foreign ships if needed).
• Potential Reforms: Some lawmakers have called for reforms to the Jones Act, such as allowing foreign ships to operate between U.S. ports in certain circumstances or creating exceptions for specific industries (e.g., renewable energy, or some types of food imports). However, any significant changes face strong opposition from maritime unions and other stakeholders who argue that such changes would weaken U.S. maritime capabilities.

Conclusion:

The Jones Act remains in force and is actively enforced, but it is not without controversy. While it continues to serve its original purposes of supporting the U.S. shipping industry and maintaining national security, it also faces criticism for raising shipping costs. Waivers and exemptions, such as during natural disasters like Hurricane Maria, demonstrate that there are ways to mitigate its impact when needed, but these are temporary measures rather than long-term changes to the law.

As for its most recent use, while the Jones Act is consistently applied, there haven’t been many instances where it has been heavily scrutinized in the past few years, except during crises like natural disasters or emergencies. However, it continues to be enforced in day-to-day operations of U.S. domestic shipping.

Why the U.S. Needs to Build Its Own Ships:

1. National Security and Sovereignty: The Jones Act is designed to ensure that the U.S. has a viable, competitive, and self-sufficient merchant fleet, particularly in times of military conflict or other emergencies. If the U.S. lacks a strong, domestic merchant fleet, it could face significant logistical issues in the event of a military crisis or the need for rapid transportation of essential goods. U.S.-flagged ships are necessary for military sealift operations, which are critical during wartime or national emergencies. A lack of U.S.-built ships means the country would be more dependent on foreign carriers, who may not be able to provide services during conflicts or disruptions.
2. Economic and Job Creation Benefits: The shipbuilding industry can provide significant job opportunities, particularly in the manufacturing sector. Shipyards that build U.S.-flagged ships would employ thousands of Americans in design, construction, and maintenance, along with support industries. Building ships domestically can help create supply chain resilience, particularly for industries that rely on shipping for import/export, reducing reliance on foreign carriers that might not have the same interest in prioritizing American cargo.
3. Increasing U.S. Shipping Capacity: The U.S. merchant fleet has been shrinking, especially when it comes to container ships and cargo vessels. More U.S.-built ships would help reverse that trend and increase shipping capacity. This is critical to managing the flow of goods, especially as global trade increases and U.S. ports continue to experience congestion.
4. Environmental Control: Building U.S.-flagged ships domestically would allow the country to enforce stricter environmental regulations on emissions, fuel efficiency, and ship design. Ships built in the U.S. would need to comply with U.S. standards, which tend to be more stringent than those of many other countries. As the world moves toward greener shipping solutions, having U.S. control over the shipbuilding process allows the incorporation of clean technologies like LNG, hybrid propulsion, and potentially even zero-emission vessels.

Challenges to Building U.S. Ships:

1. High Costs of Shipbuilding: Shipbuilding in the U.S. is expensive compared to other countries, largely due to labor costs, regulatory compliance, and higher materials costs. Countries like China, South Korea, and Japan can build ships at a fraction of the cost. The cost difference can make it difficult for U.S. shipbuilders to compete on price, especially when commercial shipping companies are looking for the most cost-effective solution. For instance, container ships built in the U.S. could cost up to 50% more than those built abroad.
2. Decline of U.S. Shipbuilding Capacity: The U.S. shipbuilding industry has been in decline for decades, with only a handful of shipyards left that can handle large-scale container ship or cargo vessel construction. This means that to rebuild a sustainable fleet of U.S.-flagged ships, significant investment and a rebuilding of shipbuilding infrastructure would be required. Many of the remaining U.S. shipyards are geared more toward military vessels and specialized ships, not necessarily the large container ships that are essential to modern commercial shipping.
3. Lack of Immediate Demand for U.S.-Flagged Ships: The U.S. has been able to rely on foreign-flagged vessels for much of its shipping needs due to the globalization of shipping. The Jones Act ensures that U.S. ships are used in domestic trade, but for international shipping, companies often find it more cost-effective to use foreign vessels. This can create a lack of demand for a larger, domestic fleet. Furthermore, U.S. shipping companies are often already heavily reliant on foreign-built ships, which means investing in new U.S. vessels might be seen as a long-term goal rather than an immediate need.
4. Political and Legislative Challenges: The Jones Act requires U.S.-flagged ships to be built in the U.S., which provides a built-in market for domestic shipyards. However, efforts to expand the domestic fleet or build additional ships could be hampered by political interests—shipbuilding in the U.S. is often subsidized, and future expansions of the U.S. fleet would likely require substantial government investment. Political support for domestic shipbuilding often depends on the strategic interests of the moment, such as concerns about national security or economic resilience. It can be challenging to get consistent funding and political will for large-scale shipbuilding projects over long periods.

Is It Viable for the U.S. to Build Its Own Ships?

Yes, but it would require substantial investment and long-term commitment to overcome the barriers listed above. Here are some steps that could help the U.S. rebuild its merchant fleet:

1. Subsidized Investment: The U.S. could potentially invest in shipbuilding subsidies or incentives to offset the higher costs of domestic production. This could help make U.S.-flagged vessels more competitive in price compared to foreign-built ships.
2. Modernizing Shipyards: Rebuilding and modernizing U.S. shipyards would help reduce costs and increase efficiency in the construction process. This would involve upgrading technology and expanding capacity to handle large-scale commercial vessels, not just military or specialized ships.
3. Supporting Green Shipping Initiatives: The U.S. could take the opportunity to create the greenest shipping fleet in the world by investing in new technologies and environmentally friendly ships built in U.S. yards. This would not only meet international environmental standards but could also become an export opportunity for U.S. shipbuilders.
4. National Security: Rebuilding a fleet of U.S.-flagged, U.S.-built ships is vital for national security, as it ensures that the U.S. is not dependent on foreign vessels in case of military conflict or emergencies.
5. Partnership with Private Companies: Encouraging partnerships between private shipping companies and government-funded shipyards could help create the economic conditions needed for shipbuilding to thrive again in the U.S.

Conclusion:

The U.S. definitely needs to build its own ships to ensure a strong, sustainable maritime industry. This would be critical for national security, job creation, and economic resilience. While it is a costly and complex undertaking, the long-term benefits—such as increased control over shipping, environmental leadership, and a reliable fleet—make it a worthwhile investment. However, it will require collaboration between government, private industry, and shipbuilders to create a viable, competitive domestic shipbuilding sector in the 21st century.

?Build Baby Build!!!! Go USA!!!!?

?