Job satisfaction and some other things
Anindya Chatterjee
Professor, Mechanical Engineering, IIT Kanpur. Author: "Build and Sustain a Career in Engineering."
Many people write about jobs and unemployment. Some people write about job satisfaction.
Google ngrams give a graphical display for the relative frequency of different words mentioned in books over time. The display reflects what people are writing about, which reflects what they are thinking about, which reflects what is going on in their lives. It's not perfect, but it is interesting. Perhaps it is useful as well.
The above picture shows five graphs for terms who frequencies are, as it happens, comparable.
Job satisfaction peaked around 1979. Robotics: 1986. Artificial intelligence: 1988. Neural network: 1994. Machine learning is just taking off and may be far from peaking. The rapid growth of ML is taking NN, AI and robotics up with it. These are the jobs that replace humans. But human job satisfaction continues to decline gently.
That does not necessarily mean job satisfaction is going down in the population, but it is clear that proportionately fewer people are writing about it. It is less of a concern.
Why? Maybe because more people have job satisfaction? I fear not. Maybe because more people are just worried about having jobs at all.
I wrote about a wage rate pyramid model here:
https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/wage-rate-pyramid-model-employment-anindya-chatterjee/
I think work is leaving the pyramid in places where people may be rushing in. This is likely to compound the problem. We cannot all climb up the pyramid without wages sliding down, unless work enters the pyramid. We cannot all become highly educated workers with high job satisfaction and personal fulfillment, career stability, and uniform welfare. Wages for all will slide down, that is all. That's the free market at work.
The next generation will face severe challenges, I think. The solution for the full population is a matter of policy, for bigger people than I am; for nations and think tanks.
The solution for individuals seems to lie in being hard to replace. In developing a long term value proposition. If, when you are 42, you do work that can be done by 22 year olds for half your salary, you may get laid off. There is a tide of young people coming. Keep climbing or get wet.
India Growth Equity | ex-McKinsey | IIT Kanpur
3 年Very compelling viewpoint. Got a flavor of this in one of your lectures too. Imo, tech as a domain is highly volatile, has nothing to do w experience (in most cases) and younger generation (overall) has a unfair advantage. High potential of disruption!
Faculty at n/a Looking for one
3 年Machine learning may be used in an attitude change process, from hedonic to utuilitarian from self based goals involving value perceived in cash to value perceived in terms of personal goals. The instrumentality may just be fed onto oneself for wider learning and appreciation.
Therapeutic Area Global Associate Director PPM - Women’s Health at Abbott
3 年In the book “Drive” Mr Pink talks about different “versions” of motivations 1.0, 2.0, 3.0. He also explains two type of professionals Type I and X. Basically it appears that humankind’s key elements of what motivates them has updated - same things that motivated/provided job satisfaction to our grandparents do not infuse the same in us. I also find his concept of Flow and Mastery (Asymptote) quite convincing. I believe we have moved in this curve, what we need to identify is where do we stand today on this journey of pursuit of mastering something, which may in turn provide job satisfaction?
Professor, Mechanical Engineering, IIT Kanpur. Author: "Build and Sustain a Career in Engineering."
3 年I was amazed by the first book. Read a bit of the second one and then got distracted. Plan to return to it. He is an exceptional thinker.?
Building better energy technologies with physics and data
3 年absolutely fascinating - I'm sure you have heard/ read Yuval's work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ1yS9JIJKs