Jimmy Carter’s Energy Crisis

In early February 1977, just two weeks after becoming president, Carter, clad in a sweater, delivered what he called a “report to the American people”.? He announced that energy would be the central focus of his administration. He ordered up a 90-day energy plan and went on to establish the Department of Energy. He followed up in April 1977 with a speech that began, “I want to have an unpleasant talk with you about a problem that is unprecedented in our history.? With the exception of preventing war, he declared, “the energy crisis” was “the greatest challenge our country will face in our lifetime.” It was, he said, “the moral equivalent of war”.

Carter knew that the United States could not continue on the course of importing ever-more oil.? He wanted to promote energy efficiency, renewable energy, and bring rationality to oil and gas prices, which were heavily distorted by an intricate and mindless system of price controls that made the nation’s energy situation more precarious -- and more dependent on oil imports.

?Making progress on energy policy faced much opposition and innumerable obstacles.? Much of the opposition to ending price controls came from his own Democratic party.? Still a good deal was accomplished, including the beginning of decontrol of oil and natural gas prices, although, as part of the political wrangling, matched with windfall profits. ?And he would succeed in establishing energy efficiency – conservation – as a key element in the overall approach to solving the nation’s energy problems – an initiative represented in a memorable conference that he convened at the White House.? But his Secretary of Energy James Schlesinger would ruefully describe what had been achieved in response, as he put it, to Carter’s call to action as less than “the moral equivalent of war” and more like “the political equivalent of Chinese water torture.”

?Carter was absolutely on target in trying to remove price controls, so that correct signals would flow to both consumers and producers. In other words, let the market work, rather than having bureaucracy decide what prices should be.? ?The natural gas shortages that had recently afflicted the country, forcing schools and factories to close, could be attributed directly to the price controls that discouraged investment in developing new supplies. Where Carter would be proved off-base was in his assertion that “the energy shortage is permanent.”

Yes, ?before his term was over, he would ?indeed ?confront a new energy shortage – but it was the result of what happened above ground, not below. It was external events in the Middle East that would change the course of his presidency.?

This was the eruption of the Iranian Revolution, which forced the ruling Shah of Iran to flee the country in January 1979 and eventually led to the theocratic regime of the Ayatollah Khomeini, who returned from exile.?? Iran was the world’s second largest exporter of oil, but the growing turmoil had begun to disrupt production in the autumn of 1978 and then led to a complete halt in petroleum exports.? The disruption of Iranian production was compounded by panic and a mad scramble for barrels that engulfed the global oil market.?

Energy had now become a crisis for Jimmy Carter’s own presidency.? Oil prices more than doubled, gas lines returned in the United States to the great ire of motorists, anger swept the country, and inflation surged.? A frustrated Carter fired members of his Cabinet.? So turbulent had emotions become that, in July 1979, Carter turned what was meant to be an energy speech into a something broader -- a disquisition on what he called “a crisis of confidence” that, he said,? was striking “at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will.”? When it got down to specifics of soothing the national soul, however, it was back to energy -- a six-point program to address the “energy crisis”, which he called a “clear and present danger to our country.”?

In November 1979, the bad situation got much worse: Iranian zealots breached the U.S. embassy in Tehran and captured U.S. diplomats.? “America Held Hostage” became the nightly message across the United States.? Carter authorized a rescue mission in April 1980, but it came undone in in an isolated staging area in Iran dubbed Desert One.? Half a year later, in November, Ronald Reagan defeated Carter in the 1980 Presidential election.? The Iranians released the hostages on the very day Carter left office.

Reagan completed the decontrol of oil prices.? Supplies began to build up around the world, while demand sagged in response to higher prices and recession – and energy conservation.? In 1986 oil prices collapsed.

?The energy crisis was over, at least for the time being.? But, by then, Jimmy Carter had been out of office for more than half a decade.?



Daniel Yergin, vice chairman of S&P Global, is author of The Prize? and The New Map

Yogashri Pradhan, MBA, P.E.

Lead Production Engineer @ Chevron | Petroleum Engineering Professor | 40 Under 40 | YouTuber & Podcaster (PetroPapers) | CrossFit Level 1 Trainer

1 周

Informative, so he was sharpened by the energy industry first.

回复
D. Langston

Event Director

1 个月

Carter's foresight on energy was ahead of its time. How do you think modern leaders can learn from his approach to energy challenges?

回复
Lisa Wood

Advisor, Board Member, Electric & Gas Utilities, Energy Technologies, Customer Experience

1 个月

Carter was far ahead of his time on energy issues and I commend him! The unexpected - well - it always happens.

回复
Victor RONDON

Ingeniero de Analítica en Tecnologias de Subsuelo

1 个月

Jimmy Carter has a great idea to put a solar roof in White House, but not so good when Middle East lose control.

回复
Richard Adamczyk

Gas Storage Engineering - Integrity / Risk Engineer at Consumers Energy in Michigan

1 个月

Events from 48 years ago. How much has been learned by policymakers from all these types of historical events? ??

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Daniel Yergin的更多文章

社区洞察