Jettisoning The Assumptions Of Last Year

There’s a crisis in the scientific academic world. It’s called the Replication Crisis. Scientists have found that they cannot replicate the results published by many scientific studies. The same thing is happening in the world of business.

Over the last 15 years I’ve several hundred business books, and I’ve written one. Across those 15 years, one of the most interesting is a book called The Management Myth, which traces the history of management science back to its less than solid origins. The book illuminates the history of scientific management and Taylorism, and supplies evidence that much the original data underpinning these theories was fabricated. I was curious if this was a broader trend, and it may be. I found other cases.

More recent examples include Scientific American [debunking the theory behind Jim Collin’s work, Good to Great. A team of academics failed to reproduce Kahneman’s work on social priming theory. In 2014, Jill Lepore wrote a polemic arguing Clayton Christensen’s disruption theory wasn’t supported by the examples in his book.

Over the holiday break, I read another 10 business books. One revealed how to interpret body language in others. Another applied sports principles to the business world. A third ported military theory to the business world. Each tries to simplify the world, reduce its complexity, in effort to offer some form of reproducible insight. If you do this, you will find great success.

The three books listed in the paragraph above suffer from survivorship bias, picking winners and using them as the data set to extrapolate a theory of success. In the machine learning world, this is known as overfitting - drawing a conclusion without all the data required. In other words, drawing conclusions from anecdotes or small sample sizes.

As I study and meet and analyze more and more businesses, I find myself drawn to the idea that each is a snowflake. Each startup is unique composition of its team, in the circumstances of its genesis, and the ecosystem in which it blossoms. Business concepts like the ones mentioned above can provide a common language about ideas. They can help us tell stories to motivate and inspire. Perhaps, they can provide some form of analytical framework.

But until the success of these theories can stand the test of reproducibility or time, that’s all they should be. After all, even some of the most successful CEOs in the world cannot reproduce their success the second time or third time. Building a business is really hard, and building an enduring company even more so, because each enduring business is built in a different way.

Each January, I remind myself of this idea. To start the year with a fresh mind, that the world is different, meaningfully different than it was last year, and that means jettisoning the assumptions of the past - until the assumption can be reproduced consistently.

very nice article. And I happen to be reading Thinking Fast and Slow right now! (which chapters should I ignore? ;) Like any methodology, the observations and patterns are just tools in a toolbox and each needs to be tailored. Test and Learn is always a good approach.

回复
Nai S.

Business Development

7 年

SPOT ON, TOM!

回复
Joao Alexandre Lopes de Carvalho

Executive in Agribusiness | Nuffield International Farming Scholar

7 年

Thanks for the great thoughts! I′m personally amazed by complexity while some others are scared. But the uncertainty created is the only consistent replicable assumption. And I couldn′t overfit more by stating that everyone should be fresh minded in 2018.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tomasz Tunguz的更多文章

  • The Third UI : The Rise & Fall of the Keyboard

    The Third UI : The Rise & Fall of the Keyboard

    I remember the day I received it : my first Blackberry. A few weeks later I lost it in the back of a taxi cab in Paris.

    20 条评论
  • The Implications of the Wiz/Google Deal

    The Implications of the Wiz/Google Deal

    Is tech M&A back? Google announced its intention to buy Wiz for $32b today. If approved by regulators, it would be the…

    6 条评论
  • Halving R&D with AI & the Impact to Valuation

    Halving R&D with AI & the Impact to Valuation

    Engineering teams within AI application startups are much smaller than a classic software company - maybe half the size…

    9 条评论
  • The Mirage in the Software Clouds

    The Mirage in the Software Clouds

    Public SaaS companies’ growth rates have halved since 2023, as David Spitz pointed, from 36% to 17%. Why? There are…

    12 条评论
  • This Analysis Cost 27 Cents

    This Analysis Cost 27 Cents

    Monday’s analysis cost about 27 cents to produce. This little screenshot is of Claude Code, the product I use now to…

    9 条评论
  • Positioning Startups in the Age of AI

    Positioning Startups in the Age of AI

    How do you position and scale an AI company in a rapidly evolving market? Join us for an in-person Office Hours session…

    6 条评论
  • How Much Is A Venture Firm Worth?

    How Much Is A Venture Firm Worth?

    A small spin-out from a publicly traded behemoth launched with the ambitious vision of transforming their entire…

    5 条评论
  • Why War & Peace Is Killing Your Data Budget

    Why War & Peace Is Killing Your Data Budget

    Imagine if every time you edited a document, the word processor forced you to retype everything that had been written…

    3 条评论
  • A Founder's Guide: Essential Management Advice for Startups

    A Founder's Guide: Essential Management Advice for Startups

    As startups scale, effective management becomes the difference between chaotic growth and sustainable success. After…

    10 条评论
  • Lopsided AI Revenues

    Lopsided AI Revenues

    Which is the best business in AI at the moment? I analyzed Q4 revenue data from publicly traded companies across…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了