JESIP Command and Control Protocols: Strengthening Multi-Agency Emergency Response

In a major emergency, the ability of emergency services to collaborate effectively is critical. Poor coordination, communication breakdowns, and inconsistent decision-making can delay response efforts and put lives at risk. Recognizing this challenge, the UK developed the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP)—a national framework designed to improve multi-agency response coordination.

But where did JESIP come from? And how has it transformed incident management since its implementation in 2012?

The Origins of JESIP: Learning from Past Failures

JESIP was officially launched in 2012 as a response to historical challenges in multi-agency emergency management. Its development was driven by lessons learned from major incidents, where a lack of coordination between emergency services had severe consequences.

Key Incidents That Led to JESIP

1. The 7/7 London Bombings (2005) The 7/7 terrorist attacks in London highlighted serious communication failures between emergency responders. Agencies operated in silos, with conflicting risk assessments and limited situational awareness. Firefighters were delayed in entering the Underground due to a lack of shared information.
2. The 2009 Cumbria Floods Multi-agency responses were hampered by inconsistent command structures. Emergency teams struggled to share intelligence and coordinate evacuation efforts.
3. The 2005 Stockline Plastics Factory Explosion (Glasgow) Multiple agencies responded but lacked a unified command. Information sharing was inconsistent, leading to delays in casualty management.

The common issue? A failure to communicate, coordinate, and establish joint situational awareness—which led to inefficiencies in managing complex incidents.

The UK Government and emergency service leaders recognized the urgent need for a structured, standardized approach to multi-agency collaboration. JESIP was the solution.

JESIP Implementation in 2012: A New Era for Emergency Response

Developing the Framework

• JESIP was introduced in 2012 as a joint initiative between: Police Fire & Rescue Services Ambulance Services Other Category 1 and 2 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act (2004)
• The National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA), the Chief Fire Officers Association (CFOA), and the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) played key roles in its formation.
• It aimed to create a common language and structure for multi-agency incident management.
• Training programs were rolled out nationwide, focusing on joint decision-making, interoperability, and risk assessment.

Why 2012?

• The 2012 London Olympics served as a catalyst for JESIP’s initial roll-out.
• It provided a high-risk, high-profile event that required seamless collaboration between multiple emergency agencies.

The Olympics became a real-world testing ground, proving that JESIP protocols could enhance operational effectiveness.

The Five JESIP Principles: Foundations of Effective Command and Control

To prevent past mistakes from recurring, JESIP established five key principles to guide multi-agency response:

1. Co-Locate – All emergency commanders must establish a joint decision-making hub at the incident scene.
2. Communicate – Information must be shared clearly and consistently to prevent misinterpretation.
3. Co-Ordinate – Agencies must agree on roles, responsibilities, and response priorities.
4. Jointly Understand Risk – A shared risk assessment ensures that all responders work from the same intelligence.
5. Shared Situational Awareness – Agencies must develop a common understanding of the incident to inform decision-making.

JESIP in Action: Strengthening Command and Control

JESIP provides a structured framework for managing major incidents, including:

1. Decision Control Process (DCP)

• Introduced to help commanders assess situations under pressure.
• Guides decision-making by considering: Information available Risks and operational priorities Resources and tactical options

2. M/ETHANE Model: Standardizing Incident Reporting

A structured format for incident updates to ensure all agencies receive accurate, consistent information:

• M – Major Incident declared?
• E – Exact Location
• T – Type of Incident
• H – Hazards present or suspected
• A – Access and egress routes
• N – Number of casualties involved
• E – Emergency services required

The M/ETHANE framework ensures that responders establish a common operational picture early in an incident.

The Impact of JESIP: What Has Changed Since 2012?

Before JESIP:

? Siloed decision-making – agencies acted independently.

? Slow information-sharing – delays in response coordination.

? Conflicting risk assessments – leading to confusion and inefficiencies.

After JESIP:

? Multi-agency collaboration is now embedded into emergency response planning.

? National training programs ensure that responders understand and apply JESIP principles.

? Major incidents (e.g., Grenfell Tower, Manchester Arena Bombing) saw improved interoperability between agencies.

The Future of JESIP: Adapting to New Challenges

As risks evolve, so must JESIP. The next phase of its development will focus on:

• Integration with digital technologies – AI-driven risk assessment, drone surveillance, and real-time data sharing.
• Enhanced training exercises – including virtual reality simulations for multi-agency responders.
• International collaboration – sharing JESIP best practices with global emergency management organizations.

Conclusion: JESIP as a Blueprint for Multi-Agency Response

Since its implementation in 2012, JESIP has transformed how emergency services in the UK work together. By providing a structured command and control framework, it ensures that police, fire, and ambulance services operate as a unified force, reducing response times and improving public safety.

However, interoperability is not a one-time achievement—it requires continuous training, adaptation, and collaboration.

?

?

?