I've met with 200 investors in one year. Here's why the current state of venture capital is f***ed and how you can still come out on top.
Doug Nissinoff
Venture Capital | Investing in the intersection of healthcare & AI
Investors have been playing a game of chicken within the startup space that somewhat reminds me of a booze-filled evening during my undergraduate days at Florida State University.
After leaving the bars at 2 am on a Thursday night with my good buddy Joe (not his real name, you'll see why I'm not stating it shortly), he peered across the street at the campus Starbucks and shot me a toothy grin. "Bet you won't climb onto the roof of that coffee shop," he exclaimed while slurring his words. To which I replied "oh please, I can climb better than you... I'll do it if you do it."
This back and forth went on for 20 minutes until Joe tripped over a speed bump, fell onto his stomach, and proceeded to urinate himself while laying in the mud-soaked Tallahassee street.
Fast forward to 2024, I can't help but roll my eyes when investors say that they are excited by the positive macroeconomic sentiments that kicked this year off and can't wait to be a part of the action. Yet, they are remaining risk-adverse and only investing if someone else takes the leap of faith, and by the time they do come in, valuation is way too damn high. In this scenario, investors have become just like my buddy Joe - beating their chests in a poor display of attempted alpha male behavior while attempting to be on top of the world (or, a crappy university Starbucks), only to be caught face down in the dirt while pissing their pants.
Now there is hope - Joe went on to become a successful lawyer (yes, really). And maybe... just MAYBE, investors will stop repeating their poor decisions that have heavily contributed to the crash of our economy.
The Startup Investment World: A Comedy of Errors
Here's the problem: in the 2020 and 2021, valuations in the private markets were way too damn high. Hell, you could sneeze on the back of a napkin and it could probably achieve a $10M pre-money valuation. It was the COVID gold rush - everybody was waiting for the bubble to burst... and it just didn't. In the biotech world, we saw companies going public with pre-clinical assets (which is problematic if they dose a patient in clinical trials and it goes south, bye bye company).
Venture capitalists were raising money with ease. Why? Well, in times of low-interest rates such as 2020 and 2021 (3.10% and 2.96%, respectively), inflation can erode the real returns of traditional fixed-income investments. [1] VC investments, which are aimed at high-growth companies, can serve as a hedge against inflation, offering returns that can potentially outpace inflation over the long term. So, their investors (called Limited Partners, or LPs) started pouring capital into VC.
The glory days came crashing to a theatrical and fiery end in 2022. The perfect storm hit VCs:
3. Valuations came crashing to reality. Remember that napkin that you sneezed on that had a $10M valuation? Yeah, people realized it was just a disgusting napkin. And since the valuations came crashing down, that meant that...
4. VCs performed terribly and lost their Limited Partners' money. Here's an example of how that works: A VC raises a $50M fund from Limited Partners. They then deploy all of that capital into a variety of startups in 2020. Fast forward to 2024, that portfolio of companies may now only be worth $25M... yikes!
How are Limited Partners reacting to this mess?
Limited Partners in Venture Capital funds typically come from one of the following:
At the beginning of each fiscal year, these entities take a look at how varying asset classes perform. Let's take a look, shall we?
We'll start by looking at BlackRock 's Asset Return Map [3] . While this doesn't include private equity or venture capital specifically, we can at least start to gauge what the overall macroeconomic environment looks like from a returns standpoint over time:
So, how does venture capital fit into this picture? In 2021, the venture capital index returned a remarkable 54.6%, marking its second-best calendar year ever, trailing only behind 1999 [4] . Then, fast forward to 2022, it was at -20.8% [5] . Whelp, crap.
Now with all of this in mind, let's say that you are an investor looking for places to park your millions/billions of dollars. Would you be investing in venture capital? I doubt it.
With that being said, I have spoken to numerous investors that are still placing their bets on venture capital. However, what I've noticed is that they are skipping out on emerging fund managers and only investing in well-known names and established funds. 麦肯锡 seems to agree with this sentiment, stating that "the 25 most successful fundraisers collected 41 percent of aggregate commitments to closed-end funds (with the top five managers accounting for nearly half that total)." [6]
To me, this is an absolutely ludicrous methodology. Why? Because the top dogs are the ones who got us into this mess in the first place. Don't believe me? Go ahead and re-read Sequoia's apology letter to their LPs for getting them into bed with the whole FTX fiasco , which caused them to lose $150M.
领英推荐
Well, that is a terrible way for Limited Partners to react to this. At least Venture Capitalists are doing the correct things to fix it... right? Right???
Abso-freaking-lutely not.
As a result of the aforementioned LP behavior, VCs are now struggling to raise their next fund. The ones that are successfully raising are only able to accomplish a fraction of what they set out to achieve. Which means that they don't have as much dry powder to deploy. So, they have become incredibly risk adverse and are passing on wonderful startups that have the capability of transforming humanity as we know it.
"But Doug, why does that royally piss you off?"
Great question, coffee-deprived Doug. Let's go ahead and ask the Google machine what the literal definition of venture capital is:
Another issue that I am seeing is that VCs are too focused on name-dropping and perceived prestige to actually look at companies and properly evaluate them. Many investors won't invest in a startup unless it has a brand-name lead investor or has some sort of famous CEO steering the company ship. Startups with excellent products/offerings and young founders that haven't proven themselves yet are now considered obsolete unless they just so happen to know the right people.
Okay, enough ranting. What can Venture Capitalists, Limited Partners, and Startups do to make the best of this scenario and come out on top?
Let's break this down by each player in the ecosystem:
Venture Capitalists
Limited Partners
Startups
More about Intelligence Ventures
We are an emerging venture capital firm dedicated to cultivating innovation at the intersection of artificial intelligence and healthcare within the United States. Our commitment lies in the strategic investment and nurturing of pre-seed, seed, and Series A companies, fueling their growth and fostering the next generation of industry leaders.
Our initial fund, AI Health Fund I, is focused on companies that use artificial intelligence to increase efficiencies and/or solve computationally intractable problems that place a ceiling on our ability to develop new drugs, advance them through clinical trials, and ultimately diagnose and treat patients. We are industry vertical agnostic and believe that generative AI and more specific ML models can be used to accelerate innovation in biotech, pharma, medtech, and diagnostics.
For more information, visit our website at www.intelligencevc.com or reach out to [email protected] for any inquiries. Be sure to follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter , and subscribe for further installments of The Intelligence Report .
References:
Chief Executive Officer | Founder & President Biopharma Companies | Board Chair | Executive Advisor | Mentor | Fundraising | Licensing | M&A | Strategy | Doctorate Degrees: Econ. Global PH &Pharmacy (Oncology) | MBA
4 个月Great Article Doug Nissinoff. Ah, the startup charades—it's like a high-stakes board game where no one knows the rules, and everyone's waiting for someone else to blink first. Investors seem to be stuck in a loop of hesitation, trying to outwait each other while the real opportunities slip by. Let's hope they can ditch the theatrics and make some bold, smart moves! ?????♂? #StartupCharades #InvestorDilemma #MakeTheMove! ???? #StartupHighJinks #InvestorDrama #LeapOfFaith
Resilience in VC is key! ?? Nietzsche said - what doesn’t kill us makes us stronger. Let’s innovate and learn from these challenges, not just survive them! #venturecapital #growthmindset
Great insights shared. Have you considered diving deeper into innovative analytics by deploying A/B/C/D/E/F/G testing to fine-tune investment strategies? It can unearth hidden patterns that traditional methods overlook, presenting a competitive edge in the VC landscape.
Med Device and Studio Founder, PhD Student, and Southeast Startup Ecosystem Builder
7 个月I am so used to hearing “fired up about it” used exclusively in a positive sense that I was waiting for the twist or alternative outlook where this could possibly be a good thing. Cheers for the post.
Actively Looking to Acquire Businesses ?? Cannabis Marketing ?? Property Management Lead Generation Wizard ?? Investor ?? Business Buyer ?? Business Mentor
7 个月Couldn't agree more, let's hope for smarter investment decisions moving forward! ?? Doug Nissinoff