It’s not what or who you know; it’s who knows you.

It’s not what or who you know; it’s who knows you.

A true story of the big job,? with Tate, Pat, and fake names.

Tate and Pat were both vice presidents, reporting to the Chief Information Officer. Tate ran application development. Pat ran infrastructure. Tate had started his career as a programmer, Pat as a consultant.

The CIO retired. Both were up for the big job. Pat got it.

Tate didn’t understand. He had more experience. He led a larger group. He had phenomenal performance reviews and was well-liked by other business leaders. He was more technically expert on the more critical systems that ran the company. Pat, in his view, had much less expertise.?

Tate didn’t understand why he was passed over.

What Tate didn’t realize is that the world doesn’t operate on technical merit. Being the expert, having a Ph.D. in your specialist subject matters less and less the further you progress in your career.?

No alt text provided for this image

At the top level of an organization, it’s just as much about who you know and who knows you as it is about what you know.

At any one time, there are three conversations going on around you.?

The first is the technical conversation. This is about the work. It’s about what you know. It’s where you have credibility and expertise. This is what you are hired for. It’s where you earn respect.

Think of the technical conversation as “I know how to...”

The second conversation is the social conversation. It’s who you know. This is about people. It’s how you develop a network. That network gives you the ability to marshal resources and get things done, both in your team and across the organization.?

The social conversation is “I know who to...”

The last conversation, the one that Tate was deaf to, was the political conversation. This is how you gain influence. How you get a seat at the table. This is about who knows you. This is the ‘polish’ that Tate saw in Pat. That polish goes by many names: gravitas, executive presence, charismatic leadership.?

It’s mastery of the political conversation.

No alt text provided for this image

Pat had this in spades. They wielded outsize influence in the organization. While everyone in the IT organization knew—and respected—Tate, everyone in the business knew Pat. Tate would stand his ground. If he believed something was right, he would argue for it, sometimes leaving bruised egos and chips on shoulders.

Pat would never do that.

Pat built and nurtured relationships carefully. Pat would argue for certain things but ultimately balanced a technical perspective with other agendas in the business.

This ability to balance the technical, social, and political conversation is what we call the leadership conversation. It’s the topic of Rose Fass’s second book, The Leadership Conversation. Make Bold Change, One Conversation At a Time.

No alt text provided for this image

If Tate had read that book, he would have been on an even playing field with Pat— instead of passed over. The leadership conversation shows you how to reframe a conversation, how to lead change in your business, and how to have deep, honest conversations with yourself and others.

If you think your work speaks for itself, you’re wrong.

That’s the moral of the story. Your work doesn’t speak for itself. The world is not a meritocracy. As you read the story of the big job, you may be wondering—am I more like Tate or Pat?

Have you ever felt like your ideas were not listened to? You weren’t part of a decision? You sometimes get more drill-down than you need, or people resist your ideas? You don’t get the help and support you feel you need?

No alt text provided for this image

You need to change the type of conversation you are having.

Where do you stand?

If you want to find out where your conversations land today, and some ideas on where to focus your conversation, take a quick survey.

It takes five minutes and will show you how you frame your conversations.

Take the survey.

Epilogue.

Tate didn’t read the book but did have a conversation with Rose Fass, the book’s author. Pat went on to another, bigger job in a different organization. Tate had taken Rose’s advice and developed conversational muscle in the political and social spheres.?

Tate got the job.?

...

What do you think?

...

Gavin.

If you would like to read more of our thinking on?#leadership?or?#storytelling?and how it can change the way you work, check out?fassforward.com/ourthinking

...

Worth the time.

Rose Fass's next book is coming.?The Leadership Conversation - Make Bold Change, One Conversation At A Time.?Click here?to find out more.

The Conversation Pattern survey is currently in public beta. Feel free to share it with as many people as you like. If you want to find out more about it or how it's used in storytelling and leadership, message me in the comments.

A great article in Harvard Business Review by Dr. Raghu Krishnamoorthy on What Great Remote Managers Do Differently.

Gavin McMahon

Ask me about storytelling, leadership, business transformation. (and also Basset Hounds)

2 年

A question I got in my DM which I thought was worth answering publicly: "how do you get people to truly understand that doing great work doesn't just speak for itself?" My answer: tell the story or stories of how this has happened to you. I labored under the impression that the world was a meritocracy for years -- it's a very western myth -- that isn't true. Talk to [xxx] about times when they have had the best idea in the room, and it didn't win out. Ask them why. The answer is almost always the social and political sphere. This gets you to at least awareness. Then [xxx] has the challenge of building new habits in a sphere you're not very comfortable in. This is not a single conversation, it's many. This is where they learn to dance on your shoes. One example from Rose and me, where she got better in the technical sphere, and I in the social, was writing emails. My emails were very organized, 1,2,3, and clear and understandable. They were a good template for her to copy. But there was no social connection, rapport, or empathy -- and it was difficult for me, a sphere I was blind in. This is where she helped me. The story continues in the next comment.

回复
Gavin McMahon

Ask me about storytelling, leadership, business transformation. (and also Basset Hounds)

2 年

Links to Rose's first book, The chocolate conversation: https://www.amazon.com/Chocolate-Conversation-Bittersweet-Transform-Business/dp/1937134490 And the new book, The leadership conversation: https://www.leadershipconversationbook.com/

回复
David Frost

I create Thinking Partnerships with leaders to improve performance

2 年

Great piece Gavin. I have used the spheres tool in every coaching engagement I have ever had.

Maryanne Spatola, SPHR, PCC

Author The Office is Dead, Now What? | Executive Coach | Talent Strategist | Optimizing business performance at the intersection of strategy and talent.

2 年

#nailedit Gavin McMahon Rose Fass!! Women fall victim to this kind of thinking quite often. I encourage them to create “top of mind” experiences with others so when opportunities arise, the other person thinks of them first. #brilliant share!!

Sujit kumar Biswas

Upwork Top Rated Freelancer | Social Media Marketing Specialist and Organic Growth Expert

2 年

????

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gavin McMahon的更多文章

  • Leading change.

    Leading change.

    Change is..

    10 条评论
  • Canceling coordination debt.

    Canceling coordination debt.

    Maybe you’re swimming in coordination debt, frustrated with delayed decisions, bottlenecks, and duplicated efforts…

    12 条评论
  • Coordination debt.

    Coordination debt.

    Coordination debt is real. It affects organizations in the way oxygen debt affects athletes: at first, invisible, then…

    16 条评论
  • Finding time.

    Finding time.

    Time is an irreplaceable resource. Once spent, it’s gone; we can’t earn more, buy more, or magically produce more.

    8 条评论
  • Your yearly round-up.

    Your yearly round-up.

    Searching for actionable insights to level up in the New Year? To work smarter, lead better, and communicate with…

    8 条评论
  • Writing well.

    Writing well.

    Writing, a business school professor once told me, adds rigor. This is something we could all use in our thinking;…

    4 条评论
  • Radical simplicity.

    Radical simplicity.

    We know, intuitively, that simpler is better. Simpler makes money.

    5 条评论
  • More perfect communication.

    More perfect communication.

    Perfect communication is a fiction. You know this.

    2 条评论
  • Shaping culture.

    Shaping culture.

    Imagine a gentle breeze. You can't see it; you can’t touch it, but you can feel it.

    3 条评论
  • HR as a product

    HR as a product

    HR as a product Imagine: a pleasant lunch with colleagues, then sauntering back to work. There, you discover a fire.

    27 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了