It’s time we changed the conversation about obesity

It’s time we changed the conversation about obesity

I’ve been observing from afar as Obesity Week has unfolded these past few days. As conferences go, it is a fascinating event and one that packs a punch far beyond the congress centre with lively debate and engagement spilling across social media. Before the week is out, I thought I too would briefly share how I see obesity and why I think it is essential that we change the debate about one of the most important health issues today.

As CEO of a company that’s investing significant resources into researching and developing innovative treatments for obesity, I clearly think it’s important the world recognises it as a serious chronic disease with complex origins and presentations, but one which it is possible to both prevent and treat.

I also understand that many won’t share my perspective, and that the definition of obesity continues to spark much debate. But actually, I think that how we define obesity is just the start of a bigger discussion we need to have about the clinical reality of the disease, the scale of the challenge, and the role we each can play in addressing it. A definition, by itself, is unlikely to change the medical care that people with obesity should expect, nor will it turbo-charge our efforts to prevent the disease.

For this to happen, we need to shift the conversation about obesity: in our families, at work, in schools, in healthcare systems and crucially between people with obesity and their healthcare providers. I know this isn’t easy nor will it happen quickly. But, as leader of Novo Nordisk, I want to encourage this change because I’m convinced we owe it to those with obesity– now and in the future – to do more for them.

So what do I mean by changing the conversation? First, I think it’s about reflecting on what people tell us about their experiences and asking ourselves how the healthcare system could serve them better. For example, in a study we supported, nearly half of people with obesity hadn’t received a formal diagnosis and less than a quarter were offered follow-up care. Another key finding was that over 80% of people with obesity believe that weight loss is completely their own responsibility. I’m struck by just how lonely and difficult that must feel, and it highlights how far we are from consistently giving patients the type of individualised care they deserve. 

The second thing we need is a sense of urgency and gravity in the debate: over the past four decades, the number of children and adolescents with obesity has skyrocketed: from five million to 50 million girls and from six million to 74 million boys, according to a recent study published in The Lancet. On current trends, they could outnumber children and teenagers who are underweight by 2022. This is a crisis for the world, with profound social, economic, and health implications for individuals and their communities, and one which, in high-income countries, tends to hit the most disadvantaged hardest.

At Novo Nordisk, we’ve also warned on the implications for type 2 diabetes if we don’t collectively grip the obesity epidemic. We need to cut obesity by a quarter to prevent 100 million more people living with diabetes by 2045, according to research by Cities Changing Diabetes, the partnership programme that we initiated in 2014. We need to redouble our efforts to prevent obesity. To do that, we need to learn from initiatives that work and collaborate across sectors: from how our cities are designed to how we promote healthier lifestyles.

The third thing I think we need in our conversation is empathy. When I meet people with obesity, I realise just how complicated this condition is, how varied it is, how much of an impact it has on people’s lives and how much there is still to learn about its causes and impact on people. It’s a challenging disease to live with that significantly impacts the individual with obesity and their family. Most importantly, many people with obesity make multiple serious attempts to lose weight but only 10% are able to maintain their weight loss for more than a year, according to research we’ve supported. And there is clear evidence of the stigma that people with obesity experience in their daily lives, and the effect this may have on their ability to seek and receive care.

I hope I’ve managed to convey my point of view that this is a debate of such significance that each one of us needs to consider how we can play our role in addressing it - whether as a person with obesity, a relative, an employer, a scientist or a healthcare professional. Here at Novo Nordisk, we have seven research projects focused on obesity. But we can’t just focus on medical treatment options without considering the broader context in which they will be used. That’s why I urge you to consider yourself part of a debate that merits thoughtful engagement from all of us. If you have a view, please do share it by commenting below. And exchange your thoughts with colleagues, friends and health professionals.

We’ve all got a responsibility to change the obesity conversation.

Denis O'Sullivan

Technical and Commercial Innovation Leader and Consultant. Senior Consultant at P2S. PhD Chemical Engineer and Process Engineering and Scale-Up Specialist. Passionate about making the world better for everyone.

6 年

We certainly need a new and more informed conversation, and people suffering from obesity deserve more support and far better guidance. Sometimes when I listen to the standard advice given (eat less, exercise more), it feels like a consultant coming into a failing business and saying "I have found the solution - you need to increase your income and reduce your expenditure!" and waiting for a round of applause from the impressed board ... Anyone with any scientific knowledge realises that the human body is even more complex than a business - that cutting out some foods is like eliminating advertising, because you just become lethargic and use even fewer calories, or that crash diets are like firing your entire R&D department - it gives great results for a short time, but long-term it's counter-productive. And of course, ignoring the psychological aspects is like ignoring the moral of the staff - a recipe for disaster. I do not pretend to know the answer. But it is heartening to see someone in a position of authority starting to push for a deeper understanding and more helpful and supportive communication. Starting from the perspective that nobody chooses to be obese and that those of us who are not obese need to put this primarily down to good fortune, good genes, good parenting and other factors out of our control might help us to start seeing those suffering from obesity as patients who (hopefully) we can help.

回复
LT. Sammy Battista

Financial Services Professional

7 年

All good comments. Society not helping it at all. Those with little or no will power are so easily swayed when there's fast processed foods on every corner in America.

Monica Enrique, PHR,SHRM-CP, CEBS

Global Benefits and HRIS Management

7 年

I find that two of the hardest components about weight loss are the physio/psychological aspects. Much like other addictions, the addictive tendency of the brain and the corelative social stigmas pay a big part in relapse. I hope to see more support from the medical and insurance industries to promote a true holistic approach to defeat obesity.

Graham Ewing

Director, Mimex Healthcare (UK) Limited; Former CEO, Director Mimex Montague Healthcare Limited (2014-2021); former Director, QueMaCo Limited (1992-2024); former CEO, Director Montague Diagnostics Limited (2003-2014)

7 年

Why do formerly obese patients have difficulty sustaining their normal weight. Look no further than the precedent set by bariatric surgery which effectively seeks to shrink the size of the stomach or at least to mimic the process. The stomach is an elastic organ. It stretches with large meals but will recover its normal volume. The problem for those who have binges of eating and drinking large volumes is that the stomach stretches beyond its design parameters and is less able to recover its normal dimensions. The phenomenon is recognised by the Japanese - the term ‘hari Hachi bu’ says it all. The best alternative is to adapt knowledge of how the brain regulates the body’s function and thereby stimulate the somatic processes which are responsible for the psychosomatic effect - hunger.

Graham Ewing

Director, Mimex Healthcare (UK) Limited; Former CEO, Director Mimex Montague Healthcare Limited (2014-2021); former Director, QueMaCo Limited (1992-2024); former CEO, Director Montague Diagnostics Limited (2003-2014)

7 年

Absolutely, and for progress to be made there needs to be a precise understanding of how the brain regulates the autonomic nervous system and physiological systems. This has immense implications for medical research because we use drugs to treat the consequence of the problem - that we eat and drink too much of the wrong things - not the fundamental causal process involving neural regulation which takes into account appetite and satiety. The new generation of leptin agonists illustrates how drug companies have tried to take the initiative. The concept has its merits because Leptin is involved in appetite however this ignores that this process, involving the relationship between the psychosomatic and somatic states, is neurally regulated (as are all of the functional systems). The leptin agonists perform less well than attending weightwatchers! Accordingly progress can only be made by understanding the detailed nature of these relationships. I have written extensively on this subject and have two further papers ready for submission to diabetes journals. Obesity is interesting because it is just a variation of insulin-resistance except that it applies to leptin and ghrelin(and perhaps other proteins).

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了