It's Past Time to End the Hypocrisy!
Insights. Monday-Friday.

It's Past Time to End the Hypocrisy!

When it comes to the discussion of compensation for financial professionals, especially about insurance agents, there is no shortage of hypocrisy. Recently, I've looked closely at the issue of compensation and how it differs among insurance professionals and investment advisors and financial planners. This effort revealed that, most often, insurance agents are making the least amount of money. Yet, they are viewed by some as somehow inferior simply because they sell products and accept commissions. It's past time to end this hypocrisy. #commission #sales #financialadvisors #insuranceagents


Rob Leiphart, CFP?

Public Speaker, Writer, Educator, Family Advocate and Volunteer. Helping families create a hybrid retirement.

8 个月

Absolutely, David Macchia. It's crucial for us to address the inconsistencies in how financial professionals are compensated. Transparent and fair compensation models can help build trust and ensure that clients' best interests are always the priority.

回复
Bruce S. Levitus

Independent Fiduciary Matchmaker! An Independent recruiting consultant supporting Wealth Managers; RIAs; Financial Advisors Wealth Management; Indy B/D & Recruiting Industry Consultant

10 个月

David Macchia A solid piece is one that sparks debate; I love a good debate on Fees vs. Commisions! Like so many things such as politics it's a very polarizing topic , however for someone who's promoted the concept of "fee-based" Wealth Management for the past 27 years, I asked myself how come no one has replied "both or neither" meaning the decision of fee vs .commission should come down to the client's best interest in the situation at hand. Do we put a client smaller client (AUM) in a ongoing fee-based relationship? Is it in Their Best Interest? or is the emerging high net worth investor someone who might be better off in a fee based approach to managing their assets and financial planning, hence knowing upfront the overall cost and expensive the relationship? It's not a one -size fits all .. for all clients. No one should have to defend collecting commissions or fees if fairly and fully disclosed ... if one applies the "Fiduciary Standard of Care" doesn't the debate become moot?

Suzanne Carawan

Sales & Marketing Expert Focused on Growing Your Business

10 个月

I very much appreciate the academic discussion afforded in this thread. However, how many are involved in the actual shaping of policy and education of legislators and regulators? The bottom line is it's one thing to discuss it and it's another to participate in the process. If you're serious about this topic that NAIFA has been on the forefront for decades, then let's talk and get you involved. Without the representation of all sides of the debate, the policies won't be what they need to be in order to ensure American individuals, families, and small businesses have the access to products and services that they need.

Frank Marasa

Insurance & Benefits Specialist

10 个月

I'm in the life and annuity business 25 years, and I've never gotten paid with anything other than a draw or straight commissions, and I'm happy and most importantly, my clients are happy. As far as I'm concerned, it comes down to one thing.... INTEGRITY! If your business is driven by that, and as long as you're acting in the best interest of the client, it won't matter how you get paid.

Ken Schiller

Giving Opportunities to Those Who Want to Build a Financial Services Business, Backed by a Fortune 100 Company

10 个月

A professional, that's compensated for financial guidance and direction through the sale of an appropriate product, that satisfies their client objectives can and should hold their head high.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David Macchia的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了