It's officially election season. Here's what that means for your portfolio.
Jeb Jarrell, CFP, CAP, CEPA
Helping families build, protect, and transition wealth
It's barely March and I'm already over the 2024 elections. I'm entirely unexcited about the upcoming deluge of campaign commercials.
That said, I get a lot of questions about how elections will affect the stock market in 2024. I have some good news on that front and I have some common rumors that I want to dispel.
Before I jump in though, I want to be clear that my take is driven by data, not partisanship. If you're able to guess my political leanings from the rest of this newsletter, I did something wrong. Now that's out of the way....
Let's set the stage.
Super Tuesday came and went without any real surprises. Donald Trump has cemented his control over the GOP, to the point of securing Mitch McConnell's endorsement. With Nikki Haley officially out and the Supreme Court clearing (some) of his legal issues, the path to the nomination is clear. Joe Biden is the presumptive Democratic nominee, although few seem enthused at the prospect of a second Biden term.
I started to write this paragraph on the policy differences between the two candidates, but nah. You likely already have a decent idea of their differences, no need for me to rehash things.
Instead, let's start by looking at the market's growth based on Presidents' party.
The point that jumps out to me is that the party is largely irrelevant to market growth. I'm sorry if that ruffles some feathers but like I said, I'm data driven.
Next up, markets hate uncertainty. At its heart, the market is a pricing mechanism, adjusting stock prices based on any number of factors. The market can price the effect of bad news and it can price the effect of good news. What it has trouble with is uncertainty and probability.
In our case, this means that the market is typically muted during the first half of an election year. I attribute this to the uncertainty surrounding candidates prior to primary season and then the official conventions.
The numbers are telling.
The average first-quarter return in non-election years is 2.5%. In election years, the average drops to 1.3%.
The numbers are similar in the second quarter. Q2 returns in non-election years average 3.4% while election years average only 1.5%.
But things get better closer to the election, which likely stems from clarity in the polls and a better ability to handicap potential outcomes. The third quarter of election years actually beats non-election years handily, 6.2% to 2.4%.
If you're a visual person, here's the chart version.
(By the way, I borrowed these charts from Blackrock. There are a lot of places to get insight these days, but Blackrock is one of my favorites. They have some fantastic resources if you want to nerd out.)
One final chart, because mostly because I think it's interesting.
What's my takeaway here?
Not all data points are good data points.
As we near the election, you'll probably see something like this shared more and more often.
Ignore it.
You can't draw accurate inferences from two samples.
Folks will use this to prove all kinds of things. Honestly, I would be skeptical any time I saw this, because it tells me that they probably don't have anything better to support their point.
So What Should You Be Doing?
Here's What I'm Reading
In the Markets
Thanks for reading,
Jeb