It's how things are done around here...
Lara Carty
Doctor of Occupational Psychology I Executive Coach | Culture & Performance Consultant | Psychologist | Researcher | Trustee
Over the last two decades I have been exposed to many moments that have formulated my world-view on company culture. From the depths of leading a cultural remediation following the UK's largest rogue trading incident, through to the privileged position of independently consulting in organisations that are truly people and culture first. The most accessible definition of company culture I have encountered is: 'it's how things are done around here'.
Culture can feel nebulous and intangible, yet if like me, you believe company culture is a leading indicator, then it is something you have to pay constant and intentional attention to. There is a time and place for expert support in this pursuit but if that is not feasible right now, how can you get started?
Observe the top team
Are the top team actually a team or a collection of people somewhat organised together through semi-regular routines? In my corporate career, I never failed to be amazed by the requests from someone senior to help those more junior in the organisation collaborate more, think about the whole firm, or find joined-up solutions. This was often accompanied by limited awareness that the top team simply were not setting that example. In extreme circumstances I've observed the team head self-proclaim how strong and effective the top team are, which is an instant red flag that reeks of 'the lady doth protest too much'.
If you are ready to pay intentional attention to your culture, consider:
Notice the conversations that take place
The quality of conversations at the top table are not just a microcosm of the broader organisational culture but will act as a north star for others to follow. Employees will notice if cliques form, if dominant views always win and if politics are getting in the way of addressing pertinent issues.
领英推荐
If you are ready to pay intentional attention to your culture, consider:
Critique the topics that are focused on
If expensive executive time is dedicated to topics that do not grow the business, increase profitability or deliver on stakeholder commitments, what signal is being sent to others? One of the worst examples of this I have observed can best be described as 'Fridge-gate', where an overly officious communication was circulated to all employees describing the harsh consequences that would follow should there be further 'thefts' from the communal fridge in the employee kitchen. It transpired the new cleaning contractor had actually been doing what they were instructed to do i.e. disposing of any unlabelled food items at the end of the day. Safe to say it was uninspiring and led employees to question what senior leadership were dedicating their time to.
If you are ready to pay intentional attention to your culture, consider:
Developing and maintaining a positive culture does not have to be complex but it does need to be intentional. If this is a topic you would like to explore further, do not hesitate to get in touch.
Founder, HEX Talent and Development, people performance consultant, author of upcoming book: 'People People: reach your full potential as a CHRO', executive coach, podcast host, ex-Chief People Officer.
5 个月Fab article, Lara, thank you for sharing. I am all about intention, and creating culture is no exception. I think too many leaders underestimate their agency in making a culture better and should be more intentional in the actions they take to invoke positive change.
CIO, Founding Partner at Integrated Quantitative Investments LLC
5 个月Great points, Lara. I would also add the dimension of the human connection to this. To what extent do people (across the entire company) really care about those around them, personally, at the human level? We are not robots with a job. We are people. How is the organization facilitating, encouraging, and fostering human connection? Also, you talk about the "top", which implies more or less hierarchy. It is my belief that flatter organizations, where the "what" and not the "who" is prioritized, tend to have a better dynamic.