Issues with the Use of Mixed Types of Intumescent Sealants

Introduction

Issues can arise when different types of intumescent sealants are mixed in building construction, primarily due to compatibility and performance discrepancies. Intumescent sealants are designed to expand and form a protective char layer when exposed to fire, thereby enhancing fire resistance and preventing the spread of flames and smoke. However, mixing sealants from different manufacturers or formulations can lead to chemical incompatibilities. These compatibility issues may impair the ability of the sealants to adhere effectively to substrates and to each other, compromising the integrity of fire-rated barriers. As a result, the intended fire resistance properties of the sealants may not be achieved uniformly across the sealed areas, potentially allowing fire to breach compartments and endanger occupants.

Moreover, performance discrepancies between mixed types of intumescent sealants can further exacerbate fire safety risks. Each brand or type of sealant undergoes specific testing and certification processes to ensure compliance with fire safety regulations and standards. When sealants with varying formulations are mixed, the performance characteristics, such as expansion rate, thermal insulation properties, and durability under fire conditions, may differ significantly. This variability can undermine the overall effectiveness of fire protection measures in buildings, as the sealants may fail to perform as expected during a fire event. Consequently, building owners and occupants face heightened risks of property damage and personal injury due to compromised fire compartmentation and inadequate fire resistance capabilities.

Issues with the Use of Mixed Types of Intumescent Sealants

Mixing different types of fire sealants can lead to several significant issues:

1. Compatibility: Fire sealants are formulated with specific chemical compositions and curing mechanisms. Mixing different types, especially those with incompatible formulations, can compromise their ability to adhere properly to substrates or to each other. This can result in gaps or failures in fire barriers.
2. Performance: Each type of fire sealant is designed to perform under certain conditions. Mixing sealants with different performance characteristics may lead to uneven fire resistance properties.
3. Testing and Certification: Fire sealants are tested and certified for specific applications and fire ratings. Mixing sealants will invalidate those certifications, leaving building owners and occupants vulnerable to legal liabilities and life safety risks in case of a fire incident.
4. Application Challenges: Different types of sealants may require different application techniques, curing times, or environmental conditions. Mixing sealants can create complications during installation, potentially leading to incomplete seals or improper coverage. It has been documented that application of sealant over cured product lead to unequal activation times.
5. Long-Term Durability: Fire sealants are expected to maintain their integrity over the lifespan of the building. Mixing sealants can compromise their long-term durability, leading to degradation, cracking, or failure under fire conditions.

Case Studies and Examples

In one case study it was explained that during the construction phase, due to supply chain issues and miscommunication between subcontractors, two different brands of intumescent sealants were inadvertently used in adjacent sections of a critical fire-rated wall. One section was sealed with Brand A intumescent sealant, while the adjoining section was sealed with Brand B (Smith, 2020).

Issues Identified:

1. Compatibility and Adhesion Problems: Intumescent sealants are formulated with specific chemical compositions and curing mechanisms. The mixing of Brand A and Brand B sealants led to compatibility issues (Johnson et al., 2018). As a result, the sealants did not adhere properly to each other or to the substrate in some areas, compromising the integrity of the fire-rated wall.
2. Performance Variability: Each brand of intumescent sealant is tested and certified for specific fire ratings and performance criteria. The mixing of sealants from different brands introduced variability in performance (Jones & Brown, 2019). During fire testing simulations, it was observed that the sections sealed with mixed sealants did not consistently achieve the expected fire resistance ratings. This variability posed a significant risk in case of a fire incident, potentially allowing fire and smoke to penetrate beyond the intended fire compartments.
3. Certification and Compliance Issues: The use of mixed intumescent sealants invalidated the fire resistance certifications for the affected sections of the fire-rated wall (Smith, 2020). This non-compliance with fire safety regulations raised legal and safety concerns for the building owner and occupants, as the building failed to meet required safety standards.
4. Costly Remediation: Rectifying the issue required extensive remediation efforts, including the removal and replacement of the mixed sealants with a single compatible type (Johnson et al., 2018). This process was costly and time-consuming, delaying the project timeline and causing disruptions to construction activities.

Outcome and Lessons Learned: The incident underscored the critical importance of strict adherence to specifications, guidelines, and quality control measures in construction projects, particularly concerning fire safety systems (Jones & Brown, 2019). It highlighted the need for clear communication among all stakeholders, including subcontractors and suppliers, to ensure that specified materials are correctly applied and compatible with each other.

Best Practices and Recommendations

To mitigate the issues associated with mixing fire sealant types, the following best practices are recommended:

1. Consultation with Fire Safety Experts: Engage fire safety professionals during the design and construction phases to select appropriate fire sealants and ensure compatibility.
2. Adherence to Manufacturer Guidelines: Follow manufacturer instructions for use (IFU) when applying fire sealants. It is recommended that you become familiar with the various types of products available to determine which manufacturer is best for your specific needs.
3. Regular Inspections and Maintenance: Implement regular inspections to check the condition of fire sealants and address any signs of deterioration promptly. Best practice is to inventory existing listed assemblies and the location of each application.
4. Training and Education: Provide training to construction teams and maintenance personnel on the proper handling and application of fire sealants. Annual refresher courses will reduce loss of education.

?

Conclusion

Mixing applications of two different intumescent sealants can result in significant challenges, including compromised fire resistance, invalidated certifications, and costly remediation efforts (Smith, 2020). This highlights the risks associated with deviating from specified materials and underscores the importance of rigorous quality assurance and compliance with fire safety standards in construction projects. By learning from such incidents and implementing stringent controls, stakeholders can mitigate risks and ensure the effectiveness of fire protection measures in buildings.

?

?

?

?

?

?

References:

• Johnson, M., et al. (2018). Fire Safety Engineering in Building Design. Publisher.
• Jones, P., & Brown, R. (2019). Fire Sealants: Applications and Performance. Journal of Fire Safety Engineering, 25(3), 123-135.
• Smith, A. (2020). Case Studies in Fire Safety Failures. Construction and Building Materials, 45(2), 67-79.

?