Israel-Iran conflict potential scenarios
Mihail Stoyanov
Helping adventurous investors find asymmetric Alfa ideas in obscure market niches by cutting the noise from the signal | Ask me about shipping, mining, energy, and banking
Geopolitics is another persistent factor that can reignite cyclical inflation. An essential nuance is the?Iran-Israel war dynamics. Let’s discuss a potential retaliation attack on Iranian oil infrastructure.
We must be familiar with the?Iranian oil landscape to develop credible scenarios. The following two maps show the oil infrastructure:
Here are the major terminals involved in Iranian oil exports:
Kharg Island Terminal
Jask Oil Terminal
Goureh Terminal
The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint through which about?20%?of global oil passes. Iran has threatened to close this strait during heightened tensions, which would have severe implications for global oil supply and prices.?
However, Iran will pay a steep price if it obstructs Hormuz. Considering Kharg's location deep in the Persian Gulf, Iran would have to sacrifice 90% of its crude oil revenue. Jask terminal has insufficient capacity to take Kharg’s exports. In other words, the geopolitical rewards for Iran of a partial blockade of Hormuz must exceed the economic costs of lost crude oil revenue. This, at least to say, is disputable.
Nevertheless, let’s return to today’s topic, the Israel-Iran war.
Shooting oil infrastructure nor new neither unthinkable
Middle East is not simply Israel vs the Arabs. Each side has multiple factions with its interests, often in conflict with the interest of the group as a?whole.
First, Iran is the largest Shia country in the world, surrounded by Sunni Muslim states. Yemen and Iraq?also have a Shia population. And this is only one detail.
Attacks on oil facilities are nothing new. Both belligerents stroke enemy oil infrastructure during the?Iran-Iraq war in the 80s.
Notable attacks included the bombing of the?Abadan refinery, one of the largest in Iran, which was subjected to air strikes from the outset of the war. The Iraqi Air Force targeted oil and gas tanks, causing significant damage to this crucial facility.
Kharg Island faced extensive bombardment from Iraqi forces. This facility was critical for Iran’s oil exports, accounting for a significant portion of its income. The attacks led to substantial reductions in Iranian oil exports.
The conflict significantly reduced global oil supplies as both nations halted exports at various times during the war. By September 1980, both countries effectively removed about?2.7 mbbl per day from international markets due to hostilities. Daily oil production in the 1980s was much lower than today’s, ranging from 66 to 74 mbbl per day. Today, it is about 102 mbbl per day.
领英推荐
Strikes on oil infrastructure were also part of the?Kuwait-Iraq war. In summary, attacks on oil fields and terminals are nothing new in the Middle East. That being said, let’s look at?my scenarios.
A few (most probably wrong) scenarios
As individuals, we have goals, and those goals have a price. Moreover, we need the proper tools to execute the required tasks and achieve our goals. The same is true in geopolitics.
For Israel, attacking Iranian facilities is a tool to achieve its goal that comes with a price. The latter is not the price paid for bombs and missiles. Here, I mean the geopolitical and geoeconomic cost of attacks.
Let’s look at the following table, which represents three different scenarios.
Number two is the scenario with the?highest credibility. By attacking insignificant facilities, Israel will project power without paying too high a?cost. Scenario 1 is plausible, but it has a dear price. If Israel engages in a mass-scale attack on Iranian facilities or at least strikes Kharg, it would spark a?fierce diplomatic response by everyone in the region and its allies.
The table is not exhaustive. Moreover, the scenarios are related. It can start with Scenario 3?and?then escalate directly to number 1. This is?just one variant. The table is a snapshot of potential scenarios and does not show the (probable) sequence of events.
In conclusion, I am not saying that an?Israeli attack on Iranian oil fields is imminent. The point is that it?is not unthinkable and, most importantly, is not a discrete event but a multistage process.
Final Thoughts
The US administration will do its best to avoid Scenario 1. The consensus will probably be a cart balance for Scenario 2, an attack on Tier 3 infrastructure. Of course, the Middle East is infamous for surprising even the most astute analysts.
Talking about forecasts and the Middle East, the following interview did not age well:
What are the takeaways for investors? With high conviction, I can say that in any case:
The last point applies to all ships. However, a potential escalation in the Persian Gulf would most impact tankers and LPG/LNG carriers.
If Israel plays safe, oil and tankers will continue to move in range. Conversely, oil prices will soar if Tier 1 infrastructure is subject to attacks. In that case, tanker rates may decline for a while because attacking Kharg (for example) would shut down nearly 0.7% of daily oil production.
Let’s see how the crisis develops.
If you are interested in niche ideas, fixed-income securities, and options, consider TheOldEconomy's Institutional subscription plan. Let’s hop on a call to discuss esoteric ideas, investing tools, and risk management.