ISOs vs NSOs: A Comparative Analysis
The South Texas Business Lawyers
Daily needs and complex matters made simple to understand
Issuing stocks by way of equity compensation is one of the most common ways in which a startup can pay its workforce. When issuing stock to US employees, there are two main options to choose from:
ISOs can only be granted to employees, whereas NSOs can be granted to a wider range of people associated with the business, such as directors, consultants, advisors as well as employees. Despite the fact that NSOs are of wider applicability, ISOs are the preferred form of stock option for most startup This is because they enjoy special tax treatment under the United States Internal Revenue Code, whereas NSOs do not.
ISOs vs. NSOs: What to Grant and When
Under certain circumstances, ISOs come with more tax benefit for the optionee.
For the purpose of federal income tax, the way NSOs are taxed upon exercise is by determining the difference between the fair market value (FMV) and the exercise price (also known as strike price) at the moment of exercise. This amount may sometimes be zero, but not always. This amount will be taxed as ordinary income tax rather than capital gains tax.
By way of comparison, ISOs are not taxable under regular federal income tax unless the optionee parts with their shares by way of sale or transfer. For instance, let us assume a startup issues options to an employee at the exercise price of $0.20 per share (this is also the FMV of the company’s common stock when the option is granted). With the passage of time, the company stock becomes more valuable. By the time the option fully vests, the stock is valued at $1.00 dollar. Let us assume the employee now exercises the option, i.e., and pays $0.20 per share. The $0.80 difference between the fair market value of the shares at exercise and the original exercise price is also known as the “spread." If the employee has been granted an NSO, then he stands to pay federal income taxes of on $0.80 of income per share, notwithstanding the fact that he has not sold any shares. If the grant is an ISO, no tax is due at this point as long as the grantee does not sell. Assuming the employee who was granted an ISO chooses to sell the shares 3 years later, they would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate on the difference between the exercise price and price at sale. Meanwhile, an employee who was granted an NSO would have long term capital gains liability on the differential between the value at exercise and the value at sale.
领英推荐
ARE THERE ANY DRAWBACKS OF GRANTING ISOs?
The preferential tax benefits of ISOs are undeniable, but there are certain instances in which granting ISOs may not be the best option:
In the event of your grant not meeting the criteria necessary to qualify as an ISO, the grant will remain valid, and it will automatically be treated as an NSO despite the company’s intentions to the contrary.
It is very common for properly granted ISOs to eventually not meet the criteria necessary to qualify for tax benefits. This is perhaps because the holding period is not satisfied, or the ISO was never exercised but rather cashed out as a part of acquisition. ISOs cancelled in favor of cash payment will be subject to ordinary income tax principles, just like a cash bonus is. The table below contains a short comparative analysis between the two stock options.