The IoT - A bottom-up approach

The IoT - A bottom-up approach

In the early 1980s, the Apple II computer combined with the first spreadsheet program (called Visicalc) revolutionized how financial analysis was done. Suddenly through the use of these new tools, complex models could be created by anyone that could type numbers and formulas into a grid. Almost overnight, financial decision making was transformed through the ability to use more data to accurately predict business outcomes versus simply guessing.

 But this transformation did not happen from a corporate edict. Back in those days, Apple II computers were brought in the back door of businesses by employees that understood the power of the tool and the value it could provide.  It was not part of the IT infrastructure and was not part of any corporate computing initiative. Businesses did not offer to buy Apple II computers and did not offer training or support and, frequently, if an employee was "caught" using unauthorized equipment, they would be in hot water.

 Yet this grass roots movement changed the face of technology and evolved into computing as it is known today. And the companies that lagged in the new technology deployment were left in the dust by their competition.

 What does this have to do with the Internet of Things (IoT)? Plenty. We believe that history is about to repeat itself. 

 As designers and developers of IoT systems, from our vantage point virtually all industries can benefit from the IoT. If you are involved in providing a product or service, you can always gain from having a deeper understanding of how satisfied your customer is, how they use your product or service, and how you can make your product or service even more compelling to that customer. The IoT allows for the collection of near real time data about your product or service -- and this data can revolutionize your business and can leapfrog you ahead of your competition.

So why aren’t more companies deploying IoT solutions today? Yes the technology is new.  But we believe that many people are waiting for someone to tell them how to "do" the IoT.

 As a case in point -- some Internet of Things providers have taken the approach of doing things from "the top down" and recommend that their clients study the IoT from a corporate perspective. They talk their client companies into developing a corporate vision of how IoT technology can be used across the entire organization, followed by the development of a 3-5 year plan to successfully implement the strategy successfully. They engage with their clients initially with an expensive study that produces a vision and plan before any real IoT benefits are deployed and realized. 

We believe there are several problems with this approach. First, IoT technology is changing so rapidly that any type of long term plan defined today will most certainly need to be redone as things evolve. Technology changes, costs are plummeting, and new solutions will be developed that are not even on the horizon yet. Second, it has been our experience that it is very difficult to envision all of the ways that a single IoT deployment can benefit an entire organization. Many times a project is developed with a specific goal in mind, but once the deployment is completed, there are typically many other benefits that are realized once the data obtained is fully digested. And third (and probably most importantly) this approach delays the benefits to the organization by deferring any IoT deployments until the entire vision is defined and agreed to.

Our preference is to promote a "bottom-up" approach to IoT.  In a similar vein to Agile software development, we believe that a strategy in which projects are formed based on today's real, identifiable needs within the organization and developed/deployed iteratively while realizing new value from the project as new information is learned, is a more successful way to realize the benefits of the IoT . Each project stands on its own merits and has specific and tangible goals that can be achieved in short deployment cycles that build on the previous cycles. 

The benefits to this approach are many -- smaller efforts with specific ROI can allow the organization to gain the benefit of IoT technology quickly to improve their products and services and reduce their operating costs. Using an iterative deployment approach, organizations can learn about the value of data acquired and rapidly build on the success of their smaller projects as they apply this learning on new deployments.   

So the choice is yours. You can wait for someone to study your situation and deliver a high level analysis of your corporate IoT situation that will be obsolete in 6 -12 months or you can start deploying IoT technology today on a smaller scale, delivering near term results that can be expanded as you learn and as the technology evolves.

Truly innovative organizations find the right tools and put these tools to work to gain the advantage on the competition, learning as they go.  Does this describe your business? Or does it describe your competitor?


Taylor Veleke

Head of Sales, Americas Digital Healthcare at Analog Devices

7 年

Great write up, Kelly. I'm not as familiar with the agile product development cycle - but I think I recall from reading up on it that they implement many short sprints? If you haven't read the Lean Startup by Eric Ries, I recommend checking it out. He developed the minimal viable product concept that aligns closely with what you discussed - develop a quick prototype that you can get into your customer's hands - then gather feedback, and continuously improve or pivot upon the design.

回复
Kyla Cromer

Writing, proofreading, editing, and CMS

7 年

Well said, Kelly! An idea popped into my head already....

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kelly Nehowig的更多文章

  • Sometimes the best IoT User Interface is - None

    Sometimes the best IoT User Interface is - None

    Recently, I was in a meeting where a self-proclaimed "Internet of Things guru" was showing his smartphone to a group of…

  • Is your IoT cellular service going away?

    Is your IoT cellular service going away?

    As the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices utilizing wireless communication technology grows at a staggering…

  • Hidden ROI for IoT Initiatives

    Hidden ROI for IoT Initiatives

    As designers and developers of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions, we are frequently asked to help our client companies…

    1 条评论
  • Think outside the home for IoT

    Think outside the home for IoT

    Too often, I see articles written by Internet of Things "insiders" that proceed to describe the IoT as simply a system…

  • IoT beyond the hobby

    IoT beyond the hobby

    As part of the recent "maker" movement, lots of interest has been generated in the Internet of Things space in terms of…

  • The ROI for the Internet of Things for OEMs

    The ROI for the Internet of Things for OEMs

    As more and more Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) investigate the Internet of Things (IoT) for their products…

  • The Internet of Things is not a smartphone app

    The Internet of Things is not a smartphone app

    Recently, I've noticed an interesting trend in product introductions in the Internet of Things (IoT) space. There seems…

    2 条评论
  • Real world wireless communication for the Internet of Things

    Real world wireless communication for the Internet of Things

    When implementing an "Internet of Things" (IoT) solution, an important consideration is the wireless technology(ies)…

    1 条评论
  • The "Internet of Things" for your Product

    The "Internet of Things" for your Product

    More and more often, the topic of the "Internet of Things" (IoT) pops up in the news, in popular culture, or in…

    1 条评论
  • The Fragmented Internet of Things

    The Fragmented Internet of Things

    The allure of the "Internet of Things" (IoT) to today's business leaders is compelling. Having the information to run…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了