The Invisible Hand: How AI Will Govern Your Hiring Process

More than promises of speed, precision, and objectivity in hiring decisions, artificial intelligence represents the future of recruitment. But beneath that slick, automated sheen lies a mess of complexities inviting closer inspection. For each efficiency gained, a risk lurks-legal, ethical, human-standing in the way of its promise.

The Recruiter's Dream: Efficiency at What Cost?

It's more a soft fascination with AI for recruiters. Algorithms can sift through thousands of CVs in only a fraction of the time that it would take for a human, spotting patterns, qualifications, and experiences that could fit well within that job requirement. Chatbots handle the tedium of questions that often plague HR teams, and even automated tools can schedule interviews themselves, turning what was once the highest labour-intensive job into one smoothened by machine precision.

AI is high volume's rescue. The big organisations facing an avalanche of applicants can offload all the heavy work-to sift through, to match, even rank candidates-onto AI. After all, it's a system which appears objective, offers what looks like meritocratic approach to selection. Why not welcome the robot overlords into the HR? Take Automated Video Interviews (AVIs) platforms such as HireVue, for example, matching video interviews with analyses of applicant responses in real-time. Concerns over bias and lack of human oversight have started raising their head, demanding frequent audits of such AI tools.

The Candidate's Reality: Dehumanisation and Disconnection

The brave new world of recruitment, empowered by AI, often feels like an alienating world to candidates. Fully automated video interviews are technologies that are now talked about ad nauseam for efficiency, but they raise a lot of challenges, particularly for younger candidates, who find them confusing and intimidating. This leads to apprehension, a feeling of being "processed" rather than genuinely assessed.

These AI-driven evaluation processes encourage candidates to put up stiff unnatural behaviours that actually take away from the candidates' individuality. Trying to be ideal for an algorithm, a candidate may be obliged to present himself in such a manner that does not seem quite natural or right. This can take away from their distinctiveness, so vital in establishing fit within a position.

Gracing AI with objectivity enacts a storyline of concern: candidates internalise rejections as personal failings, blind to the prejudices and shortcomings in the technology. For instance, an applicant could be thinking that one is rejected either because one does not have the qualifications or simply because the system failed to recognise the value of a non-traditional CV.

Another important concern is the emotional and cognitive burden of AVIs. The process tends to be very exhausting for candidates, which may deter them from applying at all. It's time that HR leaders recognise such pitfalls and seek support for a "glass box" approach-one that demands the transparency of how AVIs work. By being transparent with explanations and creating support networks for candidates, some of the anxiety linked with these technologies can be minimised.

The study by Zahira Jaser, Dimitra Petrakaki, Rachel Starr, and Ernesto Oyarbide-Maga?a, “Where automated job interviews fall short “, noted that automated interviews create a sense of disconnection and frustration among diverse candidates who might be under the impression that their background is not taken into consideration. More sensitivity and awareness of how to address these challenges are needed during the recruitment process.

Essentially, the whole process of recruitment should not become void of the human touch. The candidates are to be accorded respect and dignity, not reduced to a mere statistic, as if they were feeding into a machine. As HR professionals, the goal is to create an atmosphere where people are noticed, heard, and valued for their individual contributions.

Ethical Dilemma: Bias in Disguise

Despite promises of objectivity, AI is not immune to biases; it amplifies those biases, if anything. AI tools, trained on past data, tend to pick up the prejudices of history. When that data happens to reflect a bias toward hiring, for instance, male engineers over females, then AI just continues the trend. Instead of a corrective force, AI quietly cements the very inequalities the technology was supposed to resolve. For example: in 2020, Unilever faced criticism for using an AI-powered video interview platform, which assessed candidates' facial expressions and speech. Designed to be more efficient, this inadvertently perpetuated biases regarding gender and ethnicity.

Worse, these biases can function unseen. Few recruitment teams possess the technical literacy to audit the complex algorithms underpinning AI systems. And even fewer candidates have the ability to challenge a system that provides no explanation for its decisions. The lack of transparency not only poses reputational risks but invites legal scrutiny. In that light, the regulatory frameworks, especially in Europe, have started catching up with the rapid development of big data; laws such as GDPR have imposed very strict rules around data privacy. Compliance alone may not be enough, however, to allay the concerns related to fairness and transparency.

Corporate Social Responsibility: More Than Just Compliance

Companies, particularly those with strong commitments to corporate social responsibility (CSR), must do more than meet legal obligations. AI in recruitment must be part of a broader ethical conversation. Is the company ensuring that its hiring processes reflect its commitment to diversity and inclusion? Does the organisation have sturdy systems set up to audit for bias? More importantly, there would need to be an avenue where applicants might contest decisions or request feedback if a choice was being made with the help of AI.

Recruitment, when viewed through a CSR lens, must balance efficiency with equity. It’s one thing to hire the best talent faster, but another to ensure that the process is fair, transparent, and respectful to all candidates. Organisations that trumpet their use of AI without considering its potential to harm may find themselves at odds with their own ethical standards.

For example: Salesforce has taken proactive measures by implementing a "Bias Detection Tool" to audit their recruitment algorithms, showcasing their commitment to transparency and ethical practices in hiring.

The Recruiter's Future: Enhanced or Deskilled?

But for recruiters themselves, this growing reliance on AI introduces another paradox: the more the technology takes over-scanning CVs, ranking candidates, even conducting initial assessments-the less recruiters may be involved in early stages of the process. Which sounds like a good thing: free time to focus on more strategic work. But over time, this deskilling would leech away the very human judgment valued of recruiters in assessing soft skills, culture fits, and those other ineffable qualities that make a candidate stand out.

Human oversight needs, therefore, to stay part of the salient parts of the recruitment process. AI can flag candidates on qualifications, but it cannot read between the lines on a CV or gauge a person's emotional intelligence in an interview. There has to be a balance: using AI for administrative-type tasks but retaining the recruiter's role in the assessment of the more nuanced aspects of hiring. This way, they will be able to make use of AI not as replacing work but helping them finish it.

Well-being at Work: A Human-Centred Approach

Finally, there is the effect of AI on employee and candidate well-being. Recruitment is not transactional; it's the first touch a person has with an employer. And when that touch is dehumanising, the trickle effect can fall deeper into the employee experience. If AI-driven processes are perceived as unfeeling, people might feel less valued as human beings and more as resources to be leveraged and managed.

HR leaders must, therefore, ensure that AI is enhancing and not undermining their human approach to recruitment. That is, leveraging AI for speed while combining it with significant human touch. Candidates should not get the feeling that they are data points in some system but individuals being considered for positions where they can thrive. Microsoft has taken steps to prioritise candidate experience and well-being, providing regular updates and feedback, resulting in higher acceptance rates and positive feedback.

Balancing the Scales

Ultimately, AI in recruitment is neither saviour nor villain; it's a tool. The effectiveness of AI depends on how well it is implemented and monitored, integrated with a wider, human-driven strategy. The recruiters, candidates, and even the HR leaders have to deal with the resultant complexities gingerly. Well thoughtfully deployed, AI can transform recruitment by making it quicker, fairer, and more responsive. But applied improperly, or unchecked, it risks dehumanising the very process it was meant to improve.

In a world where human capital often is the most valuable asset to the company, the only big challenge is to ensure that hiring processes are a quintessentially human process.

References

?Abbot, L. & Hilgers, L., 2023. How AI Will Change Hiring. [online] LinkedIn. Available at: https://www.dhirubhai.net/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/how-ai-will-change-hiring [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Abou Hamdan, L.F., 2019. The role of artificial intelligence in the recruitment and selection processes: a systematic review. American University of Beirut. [online] Available at: https://scholarworks.aub.edu.lb/bitstream/handle/10938/21594/pj-1970.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Akerkar, R., 2019. Artificial intelligence for business. Springer.?

Black, J.S. & van Esch, P., 2020. AI-enabled recruiting: What is it and how should a manager use it?. Business Horizons, 63(2), pp.215–226.?

Built In, 2024. AI in Recruiting: What to Know. [online] Available at: https://builtin.com/articles/ai-recruiting [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Chen, Z., 2023. Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1).?

Institute for Employment Studies. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Recruitment and Selection: A Comprehensive Toolkit. Retrieved from https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/A_I_toolkit.pdf [Accessed 17 September 2024].

Fennell, A. (2024). Job Interview Statistics 2024. StandOut CV. Retrieved from https://standout-cv.com/job-interview-statistics#video-interview-statistics [Accessed 17 September 2024].

GOV.UK , 2024. Responsible AI in Recruitment. [online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/responsible-ai-in-recruitment-guide/responsible-ai-in-recruitment [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Harmon, A., n.d. Pros and Cons of Using AI in Recruiting. [online] Recruiter.com . Available at: https://www.recruiter.com/recruiting/pros-and-cons-of-using-ai-in-recruiting/ [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

IBM. (2023, June 30). AI in Recruitment. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-in-recruitment [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Indeed, 2023. The future of AI in recruitment: trends for 2023. [online] Available at: https://uk.indeed.com/lead/future-of-ai [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Sorte, N., Meshram, R. & Raut, V., 2024. AI in Recruitment: A Critical Examination of Secondary Data on the Evolution of Recruitment Processes. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(1), pp.2964-2971. Available at:?https://www.ijrpr.com ?[Accessed 17 September 2024].

Jaser, Z., Petrakaki, D., Starr, R., & Oyarbide-Maga?a, E. (2022, January 27). Where automated job interviews fall short. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2022/01/where-automated-job-interviews-fall-short ?[Accessed 17 September 2024].

Mehrotra, S. & Khanna, A., 2022. Recruitment Through AI in Selected Indian Companies. Metamorphosis, 21(1), pp.31–39.?

Naik, N., 2023. How Artificial Intelligence Benefits Recruiting. [online] Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/06/01/how-artificial-intelligence-benefits-recruiting/?sh=6c7fe6d27f22 [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Panwar, S., 2023. How Artificial Intelligence (AI) is Transforming the Recruiting Process. [online] 360Learning. Available at: https://360learning.com/blog/ai-in-recruiting/ [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Phenom.com , n.d. Https://assets.phenom.com/hubfs/assets/ebook/201015-EN-EB-DefinitiveGuidetoAIforRecruiting.pdf . [online] Available at: https://assets.phenom.com/hubfs/assets/ebook/201015-EN-EB-DefinitiveGuidetoAIforRecruiting.pdf [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Scheerer, S., 2023. The 14 Best AI Recruiting Tools For Hiring Top Talent In 2023. [online] Superfounder. Available at: https://superfounder.io/guide/ai-recruiting-tools [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

SHRM, n.d. Employers Embrace Artificial Intelligence for HR. [online] Available at: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/global-hr/pages/employers-embrace-artificial-intelligence-for-hr.aspx#:~:text=Eighty%252Deight%2520percent%2520of%2520companies,some%2520form%2520of%2520the%2520technology . [Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Fritts, M. & Cabrera, F., 2021. AI recruitment algorithms and the dehumanization problem. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, pp.791–801. Available at:?https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09615-w ?[Accessed 17 September 2024].?

Chen, Z., 2023. Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: removing human prejudices in employment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25, pp.135–149. Available at:?https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00716-0 ?[Accessed 17 September 2024].

#AI #Recruitment #HumanResources #Technology #FutureOfWork #AIRecruitment #EthicalAI #AutomatedHiring #HRTech #AIinHR #OracleHCM #OracleCloudHCM #bayesbusinessschoolalumni #bayesalumni #bayesbusinessschool