The Invisible Architect: Why Enterprise Architecture Struggles to Make an Impact

The Invisible Architect: Why Enterprise Architecture Struggles to Make an Impact

In the realm of business strategy, the concept of a sales funnel is well-known. To sell a product, you need to guide potential customers through stages of awareness, interest, desire, and ultimately, purchase. Enterprise Architecture (EA) faces a similar challenge. We’re not selling cars, but rather, a vision of a more efficient, resilient, and innovative organization.

The Problem: A Lack of Visibility

Unfortunately, many organizations still struggle to recognize the true value of EA. As the following chart illustrates, a significant portion of companies either underestimate or completely overlook the role of EA:

Around one third of the companies considers Enterprise Architecture as really value adding, another third views them as some kind of necessary evil and the final third is not even aware that Enterprise Architecture exists.

This lack of visibility has far-reaching consequences. When EA is unknown or undervalued (all effects statistically significant with p<0.05):

Business Alignment Suffers: The business architecture is less mature and EA is less likely to deliver sustainable business solutions.

Technical Debt Piles Up: The rate of application decommissioning is lower, fewer microservices are established and there is a worse connection between EA and solution architecture.

Compliance Risks Rise: Even if EA is doing a great job: No one cares. Benefits are seldom monitored, guidelines are not followed and overall the architecture compliance in lower.

How to Make EA Visible

To overcome these challenges and elevate the profile of EA, consider these steps:

  • Translate Technical Jargon into Business Value: Focus on Outcomes, Not Artifacts: Instead of dwelling on diagrams and blueprints with lines and boxes, emphasize the tangible benefits of EA, such as cost savings, improved performance, and reduced risk. Use Business Artifacts. Use whatever language and “artifact” the business stakeholders are use to: a business case, template a P&L or their roadmap.
  • Tell jokes – not that you are funny: Don’t tell people that you are funny. Tell them a joke. Don’t tell them that EA can solve problems. Solve a problem that actually matters for the company.
  • Get an ambassador: Select the problem to solve so that the owner of this problem becomes your ambassador, the key salesperson for the power of EA. It’s far easier if a peer tells other stakeholders that EA is great rather than the Chief Architect trying the same.

Let’s change the narrative. Let’s make Enterprise Architecture visible.

Agree with a lot of what you say. PEAF has identified 13 barriers of adoption that may add to the discussions.... https://www.pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ShowName=MB-BARRIERS#entry

  • 该图片无替代文字
Rémy Fannader

Author of 'Enterprise Architecture Fundamentals', Founder & Owner of Caminao

4 个月

Because it's a hat and a poster, but not a discipline https://caminao.blog/overview/knowledge-kaleidoscope/ea-symbolic-twins/

  • 该图片无替代文字
回复

EA's value is often tied to its relevance to business outcomes. Encourage stakeholders to define EA goals that align with overall business strategy, making it more visible and impactful.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Oliver Bossert的更多文章

  • How to measure tech debt?

    How to measure tech debt?

    It is quite important to measure tech debt as thing you don’t measure typically do not get managed and if we look at…

  • How to explain tech debt to non-architects?

    How to explain tech debt to non-architects?

    Are you building the brand new star ship on top of a horse and carriage? This is what we do a lot in a large Enterprise…

    13 条评论
  • How to deal with AI in architecture?

    How to deal with AI in architecture?

    AI is exciting, AI is new and AI is all over the place. Unfortunately there is a repeated pattern in architecture when…

    24 条评论
  • The magic 3 C’s for architecture insights

    The magic 3 C’s for architecture insights

    From my experience there are three main sources of insights that can deliver huge value and are mostly untapped in a…

    1 条评论
  • How to have an ongoing dialogue on architecture with the C-level

    How to have an ongoing dialogue on architecture with the C-level

    In a recent post I discussed how to engage the C-level in a dialogue. The next question is how to keep them engaged and…

    11 条评论
  • A dead-simple IT Governance framework

    A dead-simple IT Governance framework

    When I discuss about Enterprise Architecture I always talk about the governance at the same time. While from a…

    2 条评论
  • A simple way to create capability maps

    A simple way to create capability maps

    When I was working in consulting I had the luxury of a large group of back office colleagues being focused on creating…

    16 条评论
  • Benefits: The holy grail of architecture?

    Benefits: The holy grail of architecture?

    Let's talk about benefit monitoring. Most organizations will require you to promise some kind of value when spending…

    8 条评论
  • How to engage the CXO level on Architecture

    How to engage the CXO level on Architecture

    Whenever I tell people about all the benefits of engaging the C-level on architecture the next question is always how…

    25 条评论
  • What is the right reporting level for Enterprise Architecture?

    What is the right reporting level for Enterprise Architecture?

    Where should the Chief Enterprise Architect sit within the organization? The two most common places where you will find…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了